BigBallinStalin wrote:Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.
At least you admit you were wrong. We are making progress
Moderator: Community Team
BigBallinStalin wrote:Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.
HapSmo19 wrote:I'm sure the whole story would be that he didn't actually have any money on him(he was at home in a low-rent/high crime neighborhood). You know, in the kind of place where you leave you're wallet inside and take your gun with you when you step out for a smoke...Want me to break down the neighborhood for you?(cuz I will)
It's almost like you're saying he deserved to be shot for not having his money on him when a super-special guy with a gun came by and told him to hand it over.
Phatscotty wrote:Typical CC poster: "I don't get it! Why didn't he just drop his weapons and kneel? Then he would live! What a tard!"
Answer: FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
kalishnikov wrote:At the battle of Thermopylae king Leonidas was confronted with a far superior force which was better armed and had a much more intrinsic supply chain, before the battle he's approached by the "king" of the Persians who made him a simple offer "lay down your arms and embrace me, I shall make you the lord of all of Greece! The very Mediterranean will bow low to you!"
Leonidas looks back to his pitifully small band of resistance fighters, insurgents if you will, most of which have been his close, personal friends since boyhood, and to a man they unwaveringly meet his gaze. He lowers his gaze and for a moment contemplates the offer, that his friends and family should survive, that his culture would live another century. At that moment an unidentified man amongst his ranks draws his sword. In the deathly calm before battle the sound of the sword being drawn from its scabbard brought him back to reality, not only with it's familiar sound but also with the connotation it brings: as long as we hold arms, we hold our own destiny in our hands, no man shall be our master unless we CHOOSE to obey.
The Great King turns to the Master of Persia and, facing certain death of himself and everyone he's ever known, screams "MOLON LABE!" and charges headlong into battle followed by those who would rather die then be ruled by a virtue to which they do not swear allegiance, to be told how to live and who to pay tribute to. To some, there are worse things then death.
To those who've fought for and won their own place in this world, who've watched their friends bleed out into the dirt until breath escapes them, to those that have carried Last Letters to the families who cared, in the name of what WE believe in, our arms ARE NOT a tool, they are the very symbol of our freedom no different then the Statue of Liberty, the bald eagle or the White House.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Typical CC poster: "I don't get it! Why didn't he just drop his weapons and kneel? Then he would live! What a tard!"
Answer: FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Yep, there is a lot of freedom in a graveyard.
Phatscotty wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Typical CC poster: "I don't get it! Why didn't he just drop his weapons and kneel? Then he would live! What a tard!"
Answer: FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Yep, there is a lot of freedom in a graveyard.
If anything is worth dying for, it is freedom.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Typical CC poster: "I don't get it! Why didn't he just drop his weapons and kneel? Then he would live! What a tard!"
Answer: FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Yep, there is a lot of freedom in a graveyard.
If anything is worth dying for, it is freedom.
I believe you missed the point. Dying instead of handing over a couple hundred bucks is stupidity, not "freedom". Freedom IS worth fighting for, but not stupidity.
Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.
At least you admit you were wrong. We are making progress
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
Giving the guy his money would have avoided putting his life in danger to begin with. There is no way around this one. There is a fine line between bravery and stupidity, and was the potential loss of that cash really worth putting his life in that danger?
OIC. Let the criminals take over. Whenever someone tries to rob you, just give the robber your money and your car.
Woodruff's motto: "Go ahead fellas! Tread on me! Yeah! Tread the shit out of me baby!"
Phatscotty wrote:I mean, how free is someone who must hand over all their money whenever a criminal demands it? WTF are you kidding me? Nobody wants to live in that world, except for you and Woodruff.
Army of GOD wrote:There's an obvious fundamental disagreement here. Liberals are pussies and conservatives are idiots.
I'm not sure which one is worse.
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
Giving the guy his money would have avoided putting his life in danger to begin with. There is no way around this one. There is a fine line between bravery and stupidity, and was the potential loss of that cash really worth putting his life in that danger?
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
Giving the guy his money would have avoided putting his life in danger to begin with. There is no way around this one. There is a fine line between bravery and stupidity, and was the potential loss of that cash really worth putting his life in that danger?
Calling people names and fomenting hate is super smart of you though. You said in your post that you should just hand the cash over to the criminal. That is as irrational as it gets. There is no way around that one, (unless you call people names n stuff!)
BigBallinStalin wrote:Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.
At least you admit you were wrong. We are making progress
What does the Broken Clock analogy mean?
Phatscotty wrote:I don't even ever respond to you.
Phatscotty wrote:You are the one always responding to me, always harassing me.
You only have me responding now because you are insulting the shit out of me for the sake of insulting someone and I stand up to hatred and flaming. You have nothing to say about the issue, you only say things about me.
Good day
Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Phatscotty wrote:the gun saved his life. There is no way around this one.
sure in that instance. broken clocks come to mind.
At least you admit you were wrong. We are making progress
What does the Broken Clock analogy mean?
It means that we can protect ourselves from robbers and muggers and rapists and murderers, and especially protect ourselves from people who try to infringe on our second amendment rights. I know to you guys this is just idiotic psycho babble, but they are inalienable rights. Criticize me for standing up for them all you like. Say what you want it doesn't matter to me. I know my rights, I have my rights, and I will keep my rights no matter what haters try to say or do.

Phatscotty wrote:It's too bad only a couple posters have even talked about the topic and all the rest is a bunch of blathering about nothingness, flaming, and trolling. It was a good fantasy thread Symm!
Woodruff wrote:Now, would you care to respond to the actual points that I've made...?
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff's motto: "Go ahead fellas! Tread on me! Yeah! Tread the shit out of me baby!"
BigBallinStalin wrote:The Broken Clock analogy:
A broken clock is correct two times a day, but every other time is incorrect. In other words, there are instances when a certain stance is correct, but most of the time, it isn't.
Phatscotty cites one example of how a gun presumably saved someone's life in order to prove his point that bearing arms is generally safer for the gun-bearer. "Presumably" because the Hero was shot in the stomach as well--probably when he pulled out his pistol... And if not, there's still a high chance that violence will escalate when both have a gun anyway.
You cited just one example, Phatsco; that's it. Do you really think that's enough to prove your point, or is this another weak attempt at trolling?
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.