Dukasaur wrote:HighlanderAttack wrote:It is a race to ten win by two event
I will submit a GA Medal request for the most dominating performance. If you are the first player to beat someone 10-0 or 9-1 or 8-2 and so on--whatever is the best dominating performance and the first to do it.
--Isn't it a race to 10, not a best of ten? Meaning that the score would be 10-1 or 10-2 if not 10-0, as opposed to 9-1 or 8-2?
--oops--thanks to jimfinn for pointing that fact out
I'm not sure this makes sense to me.
Does the "most dominating" part take precedence over the "race" part, or not?
In other words, if the best round 1 performance is 8-2, but later in the tourney somebody goes 10-0 in a series, does the 10-0 get the medal because he was most dominating, or does the 8-2 get the medal because he was first?
It was pointed out to me that no one would go 8-2 but it would end up being 10-2 for example--for the medal it will be most dominating performance in the tourney no matter what round--although I do expect it to be first or second due to the better players moving on after round one and the matches getting more competitive.
The race to ten is every time, win by two though. Each round advancing on and someone eventually winning the tourney
The dominating performance would go to the first player that went 10-0--if not one goes 10-0 it goes to the first who went 10-1, then 10-2, then 10-3 and so forth. Emily may have went 10-1 this round as she was 9-1 already--if that is the case and no one else goes 10-1 this round she will lead in the most dominating performance GA medal category. Then someone would have to go 10-0 to win it or she would win it if no one does.
Hope that makes things clearer.
