[Medal] Consecutives Victories Medal

[greenoaks]

man so many hatred from greenoaks, im not going to forget these never., one day post,and he all ready demand to be rejected.

not at all.

i support the map ribbon idea because that concept is awesome, this is stupid.

[Metsfanmax]

I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.

[betiko]

I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.

how could you possibly kill 100 unique opponents straight without farming settings and inviting clueless noobs? even by doing so it would be really really hard, almost impossible.

[greenoaks]

I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.

he hasn't been cut any slack because of his constant trolling of this forum about how none of his suggestions have been implemented so it is pointless we contribute.

a medal that requires hostage-taking to slow wins down so you can clear some losing games out and get a winning streak started is not something we should have on this site. with that same medal requiring farming and ranching on a massive scale to keep the winning streak going should earn GLG an apology with lifetime membership for the angst CC caused him.

[Qwert]

I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.

well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?

[Jippd]

Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?

[betiko]

I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.

well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?

this has been suggested like 10 times and always rejected, you know that and you are twisting the reality. It's not that I don't care if it's implemented, it's that I think the consequences of this would be terrible; and I think it's the same for other people against. ANd you cannot compare it to other medals.
Say I'm going for gold, 100 unique kills. I'm up to 74 straight wins, what kind of games do you think I would get in next? 8 player vs colonels and majors, or 1vs1 against a freshly "no more new recruit" I invite to a 1vs1 freestyle map he never played?

It would be the only way to acheive gold, let's face it!

[Qwert]

Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?

im not quite sure what you mean?

[benga]

bad idea, lets move on

one of the farmers was already kicked from CC cause of this

[simmons4]

did genleegettinhead come up with this idea sounds perfect for him

[chapcrap]

I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.

well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?

Why don't you respond to the abuse aspect?

Why do you think that this will not lead to abuse?

Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?

im not quite sure what you mean?

He is asking whether the consecutive victories go by the time the games finish or do they go by the game number.

[Qwert]

I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.

well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?

Why don't you respond to the abuse aspect?

Why do you think that this will not lead to abuse?

Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?

im not quite sure what you mean?

He is asking whether the consecutive victories go by the time the games finish or do they go by the game number.

every medal can be abused ,even map medal can be abused to.
I dont know answer of second, what are better to use?

[General Bax]

did you check how many cc members will receive this medal upon it's release?

[Gilligan]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

[Qwert]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

[greenoaks]

After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?

that is quite normal for bad ideas.

it happens all the time when someone asks for a Resign/Forfeit button.

[Gilligan]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

[betiko]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

finding glg loopholes it would! or people could just create a usergroup with 101 players called "let's all get that damn gold fixing 100 games"

[Qwert]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

so then? we need to create medal who are not easy to achive, but recently i find that some members want to present any new idea,to be systematicaly farming, like that these not hepend in all present medals, but only in mine suggestion are clear case abouth farming?

edit-add "not"

[greenoaks]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

and that is for 3 player games. 100 8-player victories means 700 uniques for gold.

[betiko]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

so then? we need to create medal who are easy to achive, but recently i find that some members want to present any new idea,to be systematicaly farming, like that these not hepend in all present medals, but only in mine suggestion are clear case abouth farming?

this is not a new idea. again it has been proposed dozens of times. what is your longest winning streak qwert? how likely do you think it is to acheive this without being tempted to farm shamelessly? I know that if I'm in a huge winning streak I would be tempted to go glg style to not start over and most medalheads would. Just tell me how this "wonderfull and genuine idea of yours" could benefit the site...

[agentcom]

The person with the most games on this site [player]Mageplunka69[/player] has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.

[Metsfanmax]

The person with the most games on this site [player]Mageplunka69[/player] has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.

Then let's change the goalposts.

Bronze = 10
Silver = 15
Gold = 20

[Jippd]

The person with the most games on this site [player]Mageplunka69[/player] has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.

There has to be someone out there that has higher than 26 in a row for the map specialists. I know I've gotten around 20ish myself on Das 1 v 1. Some players that come to mind are ccat or kaskavel on hive?

[greenoaks]

The person with the most games on this site [player]Mageplunka69[/player] has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.

There has to be someone out there that has higher than 26 in a row for the map specialists. I know I've gotten around 20ish myself on Das 1 v 1. Some players that come to mind are ccat or kaskavel on hive?

qwert is excluding 1v1. it has to be on 3+ player games, and different players