First Slave Owner in Colonial US

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
greenoaks
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by greenoaks »

i enjoyed the history lesson. will there be more?
User avatar
Lootifer
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Lootifer »

Night Strike wrote:
Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.


In what way?

The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lootifer
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Lootifer »

Also I really like how indentured servants are not slaves...

lolwut
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
notyou2
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: In the here and now

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by notyou2 »

Lootifer wrote:
Night Strike wrote:
Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.


In what way?

The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.



It's not his fault. It's HIS fault. His religion made him this way.
Image
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by PLAYER57832 »

notyou2 wrote:
Lootifer wrote:
Night Strike wrote:
Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.


In what way?

The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.



It's not his fault. It's HIS fault. His religion made him this way.

No, but his understanding of his religion, perhaps. There is currently no "church of Nightstrike".
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by PLAYER57832 »

notyou2 wrote:
Lootifer wrote:
Night Strike wrote:
Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.


In what way?

The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.



It's not his fault. It's HIS fault. His religion made him this way.

No, but his understanding of his religion, perhaps. There is currently no "church of Nightstrike".
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Lootifer wrote:Also I really like how indentured servants are not slaves...

lolwut

They were not, because they entered into it "voluntarily" (often to pay for passage here, for example) and because there was always at least the theory of working off the debt and obtaining freedom. Even if the freedom was sometimes more reality than illusion, the fact that it was there did make a difference. Also, there tended to be more limits on how indentured servants could be treated, though just like in slavery (or paid work, for that matter) they were often abused
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by pimpdave »

The bosses of indentured servants would often find ways to extend the debt, just like modern usurers. Like, say the servant needed room and board once here, well, the boss would supply it, but guess what?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Iliad »

Also the working conditions and life expectancy meant that your chance of actually survivign those 7 years were very low especially given that your masters who were in charge of your well-being had no actual incentives to keep you alive.
hotfire
Posts: 528
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:50 pm

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by hotfire »

Iliad wrote:Also the working conditions and life expectancy meant that your chance of actually survivign those 7 years were very low especially given that your masters who were in charge of your well-being had no actual incentives to keep you alive.


and modern farmers have no actual incentives to keep their livestock alive
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Phatscotty »

warmonger1981 wrote:Were there not slaves all throughout history far before America came to be? Egypt or Rome maybe? Slavery is used as a tool for political and religious gain.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Phatscotty »

It used to be a rough world, eh?

What a mistake it continues to be judging all of history through the rosiest colored lens's possible
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Iliad »

Phatscotty wrote:It used to be a rough world, eh?

What a mistake it continues to be judging all of history through the rosiest colored lens's possible

What on earth are you trying to imply with this? You're clearly philosophising about something.
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by AndyDufresne »

Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:It used to be a rough world, eh?

What a mistake it continues to be judging all of history through the rosiest colored lens's possible

What on earth are you trying to imply with this? You're clearly philosophising about something.

Is he saying that today is equally as tough? I am not sure.


--Andy
User avatar
Lootifer
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Lootifer »

Phatscotty wrote:It used to be a rough world, eh?

What a mistake it continues to be judging all of history through the rosiest colored lens's possible

Not trying to nitpick but those two comments dont match up.

Firstly I agree, the world used to be pretty dire, especially prior to the industrial revolution (or more specifically the internal combustion engine and domestic electricity). Living was hard, and people were much tougher as a result.

But your second comment is odd; who are these people judging history with rose tinted glasses?
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Iliad wrote:Also the working conditions and life expectancy meant that your chance of actually survivign those 7 years were very low especially given that your masters who were in charge of your well-being had no actual incentives to keep you alive.

Yes, but the chances of even "free" working folks was generally low, too.

I am not saying their life was wonderful at all, just that it was not true slavery. But, ironically, as bad as their life could be, some folks who were slaves led better lives than free folks and/or indentured servants. In ALL cases, conditions had to do more with the master than the label attached to the worker.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Woodruff »

Lootifer wrote:But your second comment is odd; who are these people judging history with rose tinted glasses?


Anyone who doesn't agree with him.

Drunk Phatscotty was better, even if his spelling was worse.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
AAFitz
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by AAFitz »

Actually, Id like to defend NS here for showing the most non-racist post he has ever posted, in showing that indeed some africans can be just as evil as some of other races, especially the white ones.


=D>
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by BigBallinStalin »

AAFitz wrote:Actually, Id like to defend NS here for showing the most non-racist post he has ever posted, in showing that indeed some africans can be just as evil as some of other races, especially the white ones.


=D>


Prejudice.
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Iliad »

BigBallinStalin wrote:
AAFitz wrote:Actually, Id like to defend NS here for showing the most non-racist post he has ever posted, in showing that indeed some africans can be just as evil as some of other races, especially the white ones.


=D>


Prejudice.

Indeed, the worst prejudice white people can face is sometimes being reminded of the institutional racism that were the foundation blocks for their nations.
User avatar
chang50
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:54 am
Gender: Male
Location: pattaya,thailand

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by chang50 »

None of the OP is earth-shattering news,in fact a good proportion of the slaves that ended up in the US were bought in West Africa from,shock horror,black people,it was easier than catching them.Native Americans dabbled in slavery as well.It was commonplace until recently in large parts of the world,and hasn't been completely eradicated even now.The implication is that people somehow think only Caucasians have owned slaves,even just in the Colonial US,but why?
User avatar
Metsfanmax
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Gender: Male

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by Metsfanmax »

Iliad wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
AAFitz wrote:Actually, Id like to defend NS here for showing the most non-racist post he has ever posted, in showing that indeed some africans can be just as evil as some of other races, especially the white ones.


=D>


Prejudice.

Indeed, the worst prejudice white people can face is sometimes being reminded of the institutional racism that were the foundation blocks for their nations.


Is it bad that I first read this as "foundation blacks for their nations?"
User avatar
notyou2
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: In the here and now

Re: First Slave Owner in Colonial US

Post by notyou2 »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
notyou2 wrote:
Lootifer wrote:
Night Strike wrote:
Nola_Lifer wrote:Seems history shows that Night Strike is still racist as all hell.


In what way?

The fact that you feel you need to isolate this one rather insignificant fact out of all the historical inaccuracies speaks volumes on where your priorities lie.



It's not his fault. It's HIS fault. His religion made him this way.

No, but his understanding of his religion, perhaps. There is currently no "church of Nightstrike".


I believe you are misinterpreting what I wrote.

I am trying to say that Nightstrike's religion influenced him in his racism, not that he made his own religion.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”