nvwinelover, mwcc, patman

Azalin · Post by **Azalin** » Sat May 12, 2007 10:47 am

These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: nvwinelover, mwcc

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=395838

Comments: When you scroll through the game log, you will notice, they never mentioned that team 1 and team 3 were forming an alliance. But at the end of turn 15, nvwinelover wrote: "mw now that blue is gonge we should think of ending our alliance in a little while."
Sounds like a secret alliance to me, for they never declared it openly in the game chat.

mwcc · Post by **mwcc** » Sat May 12, 2007 2:21 pm

this is a team game when otto an Az killed my partner we discussed my importance and how I could swing either way I was 1 person versus 2 teams of 2 so I killed patman in hopes that it would force green (nvwinder) to work with me which I said in chat

2007-05-12 12:51:01 - mwcc: 2007-05-09 13:51:43 - mwcc: I hope you understand why
2007-05-12 12:51:38 - mwcc: 2007-05-09 13:52:04 - mwcc: i stand a better chance if we are the final 2

Its a team game once I eliminated patman we had to work together against the two of you or loose to you I was just trying to win instead you guys threw the game away

mwcc · Post by **mwcc** » Sat May 12, 2007 2:25 pm

2007-05-09 14:15:04 - Azalin: nvwinelover, we offer you a truce, until Pink is destroyed. Do you accept?

2007-05-09 14:18:02 - nvwinelover: sorry AZ i don't play like that. Once i decide to work with someone i stick with them even if it is to my demise. Plus i won't have a chance in a 1 on 2 but will in a 1 on 1

2007-05-09 14:23:42 - Azalin: Then good luck hunting Pink down. I wish you all the best...

You understood here that we were forming an alliance

Azalin · Post by **Azalin** » Sat May 12, 2007 2:51 pm

Now he tries to be smart again. You should not post scrambled parts of the game log. In the whole, there is no open declaration of an alliance, only a possibility, but never said out loud. So it is what I call breaking the rules.

mwcc · Post by **mwcc** » Sat May 12, 2007 2:59 pm

I guess we will wait and see cause I see no violation here if anything common sense.

nvwinelover · Post by **nvwinelover** » Sun May 13, 2007 9:44 pm

We didn't have an alliance until it was 2 on 2 which made the game even. They had a huge advantage and are looking for an excuse as to why they choked.

If you look at the game play it was clear to anyone who knew anything about this game that we had an alliance.

Azalin · Post by **Azalin** » Sun May 13, 2007 10:15 pm

If this is sooo obvious, then why have't I seen it? My english is quite good for a non-native-speaker, but there was no mentioning an alliance until you said to end it. Never said the magic word once before...
And we have lost games before, we don't need an excuse if we are beaten FAIR! There are better players, but there are also good and fair players, you two miss at least one category.

mwcc · Post by **mwcc** » Mon May 14, 2007 12:17 am

BOO HOO
My 1 year old understood this game

nvwinelover · Post by **nvwinelover** » Mon May 14, 2007 12:48 am

you don't have to use the word alliance there are things known as synynoms that are very useful as they mean the same thing. Maybe you should take english again. :roll:

People like you should not be allowed to play this game as they ruin it for the rest of us by making up things and forcing us to waste time standing up for ourselves.

It is only a game Az and if you had a problem you should have said it in game chat rather than wasting a moderators time with your whining. They already spend time dealing with legitimate issues, which we appreciate, and time spent with issues like this does not help their cause.

At least i am boosting my posts i don't think have more than 1 before.

Azalin · Post by **Azalin** » Tue May 15, 2007 11:33 am

I definitely don't have a problem with losing games, but I do have something against people violating the rules. I have lost many games and never complained, because so far I lost them in a fair game.
And you are the ultimate authority to say who should or should not play the game? It's people like you and especially mwcc who sicken me. mwcc was yammering and sulking nearly from the start, about all players only attacking him. if he can't stand this, he is the one who should quit playing.
But I forgot, you are american and you are always right, my humble apologies. And before you say something in response, level is just from below seen as arrogance.

Azalin · Post by **Azalin** » Tue May 15, 2007 11:39 am

And by the way, you should leave Otto out of this, he has nothing to do with this. That was entirely my descision.

mwcc · Post by **mwcc** » Tue May 15, 2007 1:46 pm

I'm CANADIAN

mwcc · Post by **mwcc** » Tue May 15, 2007 1:49 pm

looks like game to me 2 they have 2 countrys and between the 4 of us nothing even if we teamed up at this point its 2 late
2007-05-02 17:39:47 - mwcc: looks like people worried about us a little too much O well Good game all until next time

That was all I sais this was not whining I was stating the truth

nvwinelover, mwcc, patman

nvwinelover, mwcc, patman

Never declared an alliance openly.

just upset because they lost a game they should have won.