USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Aleena
Posts: 277
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 10:55 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Aleena »

oops... I was wrong -

I just looked at it closer now ...

It's +7 units for all capitals in the west
And +9 units for controlling California

I think it's clear, just someone needs to take a moment or two to actually look it over and not just jump in....
I see no issue with this map....
User avatar
dolomite13
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:54 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by dolomite13 »

Has anyone given any consideration to simply cloning the map and labeling the map "USA 2.2", changing the xml for 40 players, and making this the second Battle Royale map?

I think it could work quite well as one. With this map "USA 2.1" staying an 8 player map.

=D13=
Where Have I Been? ... Testing a prototype board game that I co-designed called Alien Overrun!
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

dolomite13 wrote:Has anyone given any consideration to simply cloning the map and labeling the map "USA 2.2", changing the xml for 40 players, and making this the second Battle Royale map?

I think it could work quite well as one. With this map "USA 2.1" staying an 8 player map.

=D13=


Fantastic idea...
Image
docchaos
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:11 am

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by docchaos »

Somehow I got the feeling you didn't read my last post because of that "feedback" by Bradley Bomber, so here's a kind reminder. :D
docchaos wrote:Speaking of connections: I know you're trying to go for geographic accuracy, but do you think you could move Sioux Falls SD slightly away from Sioux City, so it doesn't look like they're connected?
And I found a "real" bug (as opposed to the other stuff which is just a matter of taste I guess): The Rockies capitals bonus includes Omaha instead of Lincoln for Nebraska.
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by isaiah40 »

docchaos wrote:Somehow I got the feeling you didn't read my last post because of that "feedback" by Bradley Bomber, so here's a kind reminder. :D
docchaos wrote:Speaking of connections: I know you're trying to go for geographic accuracy, but do you think you could move Sioux Falls SD slightly away from Sioux City, so it doesn't look like they're connected?
And I found a "real" bug (as opposed to the other stuff which is just a matter of taste I guess): The Rockies capitals bonus includes Omaha instead of Lincoln for Nebraska.

Nah, sorry, I just forgot about it. I'm going to wait and see if others have the same problem with Sioux City & Sioux Falls. So far you are the first one to bring it up. As for the Rockies capital bonus, Gilligan did you get that!?
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

EDIT use file below this post
Image
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

Update with Omaha/Lincoln fix, and Augusta coordinate
Attachments
USANew.xml
(116.75 KiB) Downloaded 977 times
Image
User avatar
JamesKer1
Posts: 1338
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: Good ol' Kentucky

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by JamesKer1 »

Sioux Falls Numbering a little off centered...?
Join CrossMapAHolics!

Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.




A new era of monthly challenges has begun...
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

Update with all airports starting with 5 neutral
Attachments
USA2.xml
(116.75 KiB) Downloaded 882 times
Image
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by iancanton »

i'm surprised that the airports have n5 neutral. i thought it was n2, with the n5 on anchorage being a mistake. it does make some sense that the airports are more than n2, but having to go thru 10 neutrals just to take a flight seems a bit extreme.

ian. :)
Image
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by isaiah40 »

iancanton wrote:i'm surprised that the airports have n5 neutral. i thought it was n2, with the n5 on anchorage being a mistake. it does make some sense that the airports are more than n2, but having to go thru 10 neutrals just to take a flight seems a bit extreme.

ian. :)

It's the TSA security check points, it's the hassles!
docchaos
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:11 am

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by docchaos »

Gilligan wrote:Update with all airports starting with 5 neutral

Apparently you reintroduced that Omaha/Lincoln bug with that update.
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2487
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by ViperOverLord »

iancanton wrote:i'm surprised that the airports have n5 neutral. i thought it was n2, with the n5 on anchorage being a mistake. it does make some sense that the airports are more than n2, but having to go thru 10 neutrals just to take a flight seems a bit extreme.

ian. :)


I can see having them 2-5. Having airports at 2 but resetting should maybe be a consideration.
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

docchaos wrote:
Gilligan wrote:Update with all airports starting with 5 neutral

Apparently you reintroduced that Omaha/Lincoln bug with that update.


...Huh. How did that happen
Attachments
USALive.xml
(116.75 KiB) Downloaded 757 times
Image
User avatar
thenobodies80
Posts: 5400
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Milan

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by thenobodies80 »

Gilligan wrote:
docchaos wrote:
Gilligan wrote:Update with all airports starting with 5 neutral

Apparently you reintroduced that Omaha/Lincoln bug with that update.


...Huh. How did that happen


Sent! :)
User avatar
Vlasov
Posts: 244
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 2:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Baker's Field

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Vlasov »

I've played some games on USA 2.1, and actually won two of them... (one win was because other players just dropped out, since it's such a huge map, and it takes a lot of patience and attention to detail on every turn). I think having n5 neutral on the airports is good, because they play such a critical part in the final stages of a game, especially with the Trench option. Resetting with n2 neutral wouldn't be good with trench.
Olinguito
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 1:22 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Olinguito »

Noticed that in the game log, Missouri is abbreviated as MI instead of MO. No mistake though in the graphics (mini-map and legend for St Louis).
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

I don't know how augusta got moved again. I didn't touch the coords. :?
Attachments
USALive (2).xml
(116.75 KiB) Downloaded 817 times
Image
User avatar
thenobodies80
Posts: 5400
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Milan

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by thenobodies80 »

Because it has not been updated yet...
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by iancanton »

isaiah40 wrote:
iancanton wrote:i'm surprised that the airports have n5 neutral. i thought it was n2, with the n5 on anchorage being a mistake. it does make some sense that the airports are more than n2, but having to go thru 10 neutrals just to take a flight seems a bit extreme.

ian. :)

It's the TSA security check points, it's the hassles!

i know exactly what u mean. i missed my plane once, going from toronto to detroit, because of the thoroughness of the TSA in processing each passenger.

ViperOverLord wrote:I can see having them 2-5. Having airports at 2 but resetting should maybe be a consideration.

killer neutral airports cannot be used for this map because the airports are part of the state bonuses. the road through calgary, which does have a killer neutral, works because calgary is not part of any bonuses.

Olinguito wrote:Noticed that in the game log, Missouri is abbreviated as MI instead of MO. No mistake though in the graphics (mini-map and legend for St Louis).

the USALive (2).xml file still has this error.

ian. :)
Image
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

ISAIAH!

No wonder the army for Augusta is never right. The live map doesn't match the one in your first post! :roll: :| :lol:

Here is the FINAL fix.

1) Small Augusta is proper
2) Missouri (MI) changed to Missouri (MO)
3) Lincoln is now in the Rockies Capital bonus instead of Omaha

Now that we finally found the issue we can quench this bad boy.
Attachments
USA1023.xml
(116.75 KiB) Downloaded 776 times
Image
User avatar
Robespierre__
Posts: 515
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 2:23 pm
Gender: Male
Location: New Jersey

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Robespierre__ »

Are you only supposed to get a single +1 bonus for the capitals? The way the map index reads it seems like you get +1 for every 2 capitals but I am definitively not getting that in my present game. If you are only entitled to one bonus, I think the map index should be correct to indicate as such.
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Gilligan »

Robespierre__ wrote:Are you only supposed to get a single +1 bonus for the capitals? The way the map index reads it seems like you get +1 for every 2 capitals but I am definitively not getting that in my present game. If you are only entitled to one bonus, I think the map index should be correct to indicate as such.


There are two capital bonuses, the standard capital bonus and the interstate capital bonus. Your game is fog so I can't check it.
Image
TheFlashPoint
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 3:57 am
Location: In Titan II, with no troops in the US
Contact:

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by TheFlashPoint »

I love this map! Ive noticed two things that give students of this map an advantage over novices.

1) holding the capitals of minnesota and iowa seems to give a +4 bonus. If this is intended to be a subsidy for occupying those states, novices would benefit from having this information up front.

2) i play fog almost exclusively on this map. Given the large list of variable bonuses (and their static order in the console readout), it is often possible to divine an opponent's holdings through mere familiarity with the map.

Thanks to the author for making a truly awesome map.
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by isaiah40 »

TheFlashPoint wrote:I love this map! Ive noticed two things that give students of this map an advantage over novices.

1) holding the capitals of minnesota and iowa seems to give a +4 bonus. If this is intended to be a subsidy for occupying those states, novices would benefit from having this information up front.

It is actually +3 - +1 for holding 2 capitals, and +2 for holding capitals on an interstate

TheFlashPoint wrote:2) i play fog almost exclusively on this map. Given the large list of variable bonuses (and their static order in the console readout), it is often possible to divine an opponent's holdings through mere familiarity with the map.

I'm not sure what you mean by this?

TheFlashPoint wrote:Thanks to the author for making a truly awesome map.

You're most welcome, and Thank You!!
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”