Army of GOD wrote:Also, kgb, the reason why I"m posting in the QT is because you guys pissed your pants when I said (and followed through with) that I don't want to post much in the QT.
Also also, you say with confidence that there's only one scum in Braavos while betiko says the check came back as 1/5? That's somewhat fishy and naive.
Pissed our pants? actually MP posted after the same thing and activity pretty much stopped until rob brought the discussion back.
And are we really discussing the results of braavos again? My vote stays, you're trying to discredit whoever's results (I forget but believe betiko passed along the info) feel free to go back and point out the "irregularities" with the investigation results of the towns but that only further solidifies my opinion that you'd rather focus on stuff that sidetracks the point of the game in the attempt to appear activity and comment on actual players and give your reads
strike wolf wrote:It is kind of difficult to say you arent pushing him as scum when you say that he is pushing an anti-town agenda and threaten to shoot him.
Also by your own logic that Boone is vig worthy fo making a case against an unconfirmed town (you) than you should vig yourself bcause your predecessor (jak) voted for two now proven town (crasp and firth) on day 1 alone.
SCK's claim checks out pending counter claim.
As for point number one, she threatened to vote me. I know I'm town. That ensures that if she's town she's playing against her win-con. If people continue to push on me (a townie), then I will take matters into my own hands because I know that they do not have town's best interest at heart.
Since I am getting lynched, might also as well give you my impersonation of IAmRobik:
Everyone, don't vote for me because I am town. Anyone who votes on me will be persecuted for life, even after the game. Also, I am town because I said so. I even have hard evidence that I am town, just look at this post.
IAmRobik wrote:I AM TOWN
And wtf is the throne anyway.
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people.
I am defending because your reasoning is bogus. You want to vig him for a weak ass reason. You just proved that it was a double standard. And you apparently missed where he actually did explain his role and why his role works that way and frankly I kind of liked his reasoning for not immediately coming out with the information.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Pretender isn't my first choice but SCK looks like town with his role checking out and I'll take very likely town over "don't think he's scum" and with 10 minutes left I don't think IAmRobik will get to more votes than SCK to save him but Pretender could.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
SeriousCowKing (6): Nebuchadnezer, Strike Wolf, MudPuppy, legionnare, boonetown, Epitaph1 legionnare (0): betiko pretender77 (4): Zivel, jwiedlin, Robik, Strike Wolf Nebuchadnezer (1): pancakemix, Zivel (1): Army of GOD Army of GOD (1): kgb007 Iamrobik (1): SiriusCowking
StorrZerg wrote:IAmRobik seems to have been temporally banned by an automated bot. (banning spammers and advertisers) currently working with him to get unbanned.
Well it's night time anyway and he wasn't going to get lynched so I think you can go ahead and post the lynch scene.
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people.
Filthy Cunt. Born of incest, the screams for blood. What had this boy done to deserve his fate. Maybe it was the whores that went disappearing... Maybe it was the way he commanded the kings guard to beat his betrothed. Could it be the way he Beheaded Ned Stark? The wills of women be weak in his eyes. I suppose we have all awaited his death, his sweat purple death. The pidgin pie thick, his whimpering a sweet sweet song.
Army of GOD wrote:Also, kgb, the reason why I"m posting in the QT is because you guys pissed your pants when I said (and followed through with) that I don't want to post much in the QT.
Also also, you say with confidence that there's only one scum in Braavos while betiko says the check came back as 1/5? That's somewhat fishy and naive.
Pissed our pants? actually MP posted after the same thing and activity pretty much stopped until rob brought the discussion back.
And are we really discussing the results of braavos again? My vote stays, you're trying to discredit whoever's results (I forget but believe betiko passed along the info) feel free to go back and point out the "irregularities" with the investigation results of the towns but that only further solidifies my opinion that you'd rather focus on stuff that sidetracks the point of the game in the attempt to appear activity and comment on actual players and give your reads
What do you mean discredit results? betiko literally said "1/5". Not 1/6, 1/5. That means the sixth person in our town could be town or scum. You don't seem to understand that and are declaring without a doubt that there is only 1 scum in our town.
I do wonder why Pretender died instead of SCK. It is an interesting ability though I can't think of too many times one would have the chance to use it. Too powerful to give to scum when they could switch the lynch off of themselves and limited effectiveness to town.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:I do wonder why Pretender died instead of SCK. It is an interesting ability though I can't think of too many times one would have the chance to use it. Too powerful to give to scum when they could switch the lynch off of themselves and limited effectiveness to town.
Seems to me that someone believed SCK's claim and saved him, now how do we verify SCK's claim?
strike wolf wrote:I do wonder why Pretender died instead of SCK. It is an interesting ability though I can't think of too many times one would have the chance to use it. Too powerful to give to scum when they could switch the lynch off of themselves and limited effectiveness to town.
Seems to me that someone believed SCK's claim and saved him, now how do we verify SCK's claim?
I was thinking SCK saved himself. Like legionnare, I am thinking that this is too powerful an ability for scum, so am leaning town on SCK.
That was the most frustrating thing of all time. I'm back! I was spamming the f*ck out of Braavos chat for someone to help me and to post on my behalf, but no one was willing to do it :-\
Analysis: I think the wagons yesterday were most likely Town/Town. Although I wouldn't put it past mafia to have 2RBs, the descriptions of what transpired between the mafia RB and and SCK wouldn't seem like maf/maf. SCK wouldn't have been so aggro against the RB claim of bunnies.
strike wolf wrote:I am defending because your reasoning is bogus. You want to vig him for a weak ass reason. You just proved that it was a double standard. And you apparently missed where he actually did explain his role and why his role works that way and frankly I kind of liked his reasoning for not immediately coming out with the information.
She asked me why I thought she was scummy. I responded. If you don't like my reasoning that's fine, but most of why you don't like it is because of the fact that I'm not well informed. While that is my fault, I don't think that you need to take such an antagonistic approach to me. You could simply link me to the post where she explains herself and then maybe I'll be like "oh, ok, that makes sense."
Or...you know...keep being a dick to me. That's cool too. If I dish it out, I better know how to take it.
For the record, I did not saved myself, I am a roleblocker and I don't have any more powers than that. If you want to verify that I am indeed a roleblocker, tell me who to roleblock and you will have proof, as long as that person admits being roleblocked.
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people.
