Wwoody123 and claudia

firth4eva · Post by **firth4eva** » Sat May 26, 2007 3:55 am

Subject line: Wwoody123 and claudia

These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: Wwoody123 and claudia

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=455245 http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=455244 http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=455243 http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=455242 http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=455237

Comments: Play lots of games together and do very suspicious moves

firth4eva

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:56 pm

As you know, secret alliances are very hard to prove based on a single game. Especially when the provided evidence is "suspicious moves".

So leave feedback if the evidence warrants it, and if there are more legit accusations they will probably be blocked.

Curmudgeonx · Post by **Curmudgeonx** » Tue May 29, 2007 10:30 am

Hmm, I was the other player in 455244. Definitely no evidence of multis. Secret Alliances? They do keep to 3 player games and in my game, they did not run at each other, but I hit them hard and early. If they had a secret alliance, it was ineffective.

Buddy Jesus · Post by **Buddy Jesus** » Tue May 29, 2007 3:37 pm

I would go with no on this
they are both fairly well established players, and they have 5 games with each other. Plus the latest move in the first game you linked was green taking asia away from red, so that rules out secret alliance.
Lastly, their turn times aren't remotely close 90% of the time, so that rules out multi's.