[MWC4r] S&M (12) vs ATN (9) - S&M WINS - FINAL 8/31/17

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

[MWC4r] S&M (12) vs ATN (9) - S&M WINS - FINAL 8/31/17

Post by MTIceman41 »

The Mini Cup continues on for S&M and ATN: GL everyone :D
CLICK ME
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2732

[spoiler=Contacts]S&M: 1st [player]MTIceman41[/player] 2nd [player]Josko.ri[/player]
ATN: [player]iAmCaffeine[/player][/spoiler]
[spoiler=Start Date]July 9th game exchange: games joined within 5 days[/spoiler]
[spoiler=Rules of Engagement]Automatic
Sequential
No Spoils, Escalating, or Flat Rate Spoils
Chained, Adjacent, or Unlimited Forts
NO FOG! - NO TRENCH!
21 Game Mini Wars
3 Dub + 3 Trip + 3 Quad + 1 Clan Choice Home (D/T/Q)
3 Dub + 3 Trip + 3 Quad + 1 Clan Choice Away (D/T/Q)
Tie Breaker Classic Trips ESC Chained Sunny
6 games max per player, tiebreaker doesn't count towards max number of games
***No map repeats[/spoiler]
[spoiler=Maps Allowed]Classic
Africa
Age Of Merchants
Age Of Realms : Magic
Age Of Realms : Might
Alexanders Empire
American Civil War
Ancient Greece
Arctic
Australia
Bamboo Jack
Battle for Australia
Battle of Actium
BeNeLux
Berlin 1961
Brazil
British Isles
Cairns Coral Coast
Canada
Caribbean Islands
CCU
Chinese Checkers
Circus Maximus
Conquer Man
Crossword
D-Day: Omaha Beach!
Discworld
Doodle Earth
Duck & Cover
Egypt : Valley of the Kings
Eight Thoughts
Europe
Extreme Global Warming
Far East
Feudal War
France
Germany
Great Lakes
Hong Kong
Iberia
Indochina
Ireland
Italy
King Of The Mountains
Madness (our house)
Malta
Middle East
Midgard
Midkemdil
Mongol Empire
Montreal
North America
Pearl Harbor
Philippines
Portugal
Rail USA
San Francisco
Scotland
Senate
Siege!
Solar System
South America
Space
Tamriel
The Puget Sound
USA
USA : Apocalypse
World 2.1
WWII Eastern Front Image
WWII Western Front
WWII: Operation Iwo Jima[/spoiler]
[spoiler=SandM Home Games]Doub: Game 17557734 S&M
Game 17557735 ATN
Game 17557798 S&M
Trip: Game 17557750 S&M
Game 17557747 ATN
Game 17557751 ATN
Quad: Game 17557760 S&M
Game 17557764 S&M
Game 17557765 S&M
Extra:Game 17557768 S&M[/spoiler]
[spoiler=ATN Home Games]Dubs:
Game 17558563 ATN
Game 17567830 S&M
Game 17558574 S&M
Trips:
Game 17558575 ATN
Game 17558580 S&M
Game 17558583 ATN
Quads:
Game 17558584 ATN
Game 17558585 S&M
Game 17558589 ATN
Extra:Game 17558659 S&M[/spoiler]
[spoiler=tiebreaker]Game 17557770 ATN[/spoiler]
[spoiler=SandM Player Count]Xroads 2
Emily 2
MTIceman41 5*tiebreaker not included
Mageplunka 1*tiebreaker not included
Merch 2
Kjg 1
Ian 1
Dave 2
Ender 2
Dustin 1
AllBlackRugby 1
Pirlo 2
JCmagno 2
NiMic 2
Coke 2
Josko 2
Astoriana 1
Teegee 2
wizz 1*tiebreaker not included[/spoiler]
[spoiler=ATN Player Count][/spoiler]
[spoiler=Ranking Confirmation]Both sides agree with wall message and this thread[/spoiler]
Last edited by MTIceman41 on Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:11 pm, edited 45 times in total.
Image
shocked439
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Denver, Colorado

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by shocked439 »

I predict coffee chap and frosty talk a lot of trash in this thread.
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by MTIceman41 »

shocked439 wrote:I predict coffee chap and frosty talk a lot of trash in this thread.

:lol:
Image
User avatar
Arama86n
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by Arama86n »

Well Caff, here is a fantastic chance to translate chest-thumping to on-paper results. Small war, but still, a win vs S&M would go some way to making a mark.
That god damn massive roster, honestly... I've always felt that TOFU is like a small band of rebels with supply-line problems facing the Galactic Empire...
Yeah, lets go with a Star Wars reference. Josko is definitely Vader. ;)

May the force be with you Caff.
Have fun everyone.
Last edited by Arama86n on Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by iAmCaffeine »

Arama86n wrote:Well Caff, here is a fantastic chance to translate chest-thumping to on-paper results. Small war, but still, a win vs S&M would go some way to making a mark.
That god damn massive roster, honestly... I've always felt that TOFU is like a small band of rebels with supply-line problems facing the Galactic Empire...

Then how do you think our clan has felt its entire existence? :lol:

Aeternus agrees to terms.
Image
User avatar
Extreme Ways
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:02 am

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by Extreme Ways »

Arama86n wrote:Well Caff, here is a fantastic chance to translate chest-thumping to on-paper results. Small war, but still, a win vs S&M would go some way to making a mark.
That god damn massive roster, honestly... I've always felt that TOFU is like a small band of rebels with supply-line problems facing the Galactic Empire...
Yeah, lets go with a Star Wars reference. Josko is definitely Vader. ;)

May the force be with you Caff.
Have fun everyone.

A small defeat also goes a long way to making a mark with S&M's current strength.
TOFU, ex-REP, ex-VDLL, ex-KoRT.
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by MTIceman41 »

iAmCaffeine wrote:
Arama86n wrote:Well Caff, here is a fantastic chance to translate chest-thumping to on-paper results. Small war, but still, a win vs S&M would go some way to making a mark.
That god damn massive roster, honestly... I've always felt that TOFU is like a small band of rebels with supply-line problems facing the Galactic Empire...

Then how do you think our clan has felt its entire existence? :lol:

Aeternus agrees to terms.


Do you guys also agree to have this war ranked?
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by iAmCaffeine »

Don't you read the love notes I leave on your wall?
Image
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by MTIceman41 »

iAmCaffeine wrote:Don't you read the love notes I leave on your wall?


I do but this is more official. :D
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by iAmCaffeine »

Well the answer is yes to both of your questions babe.
Image
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by MTIceman41 »

iAmCaffeine wrote:Well the answer is yes to both of your questions babe.


Thanks bud
Image
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN starting

Post by MTIceman41 »

First W to S&M...looks to be a close war however
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (1) vs (0) ATN starting

Post by iAmCaffeine »

You need to update Game 17558564 with Game 17567830.
Image
jcmagno
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 8:15 pm
Gender: Male

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN starting

Post by jcmagno »

MTIceman41 wrote:First W to S&M...looks to be a close war however

=D> =D> =D> Go S&M!
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (2) vs (2) ATN starting

Post by iAmCaffeine »

Damn, what a tie-breaker Game 17557770 was.
Image
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (2) vs (2) ATN starting

Post by MTIceman41 »

iAmCaffeine wrote:Damn, what a tie-breaker Game 17557770 was.


Yea we went aggressive and lost out 2x...was fun game and well played by all
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (2) vs (2) ATN starting

Post by iAmCaffeine »

Yeah, and I made a mistake which almost cost us the game.
Image
User avatar
rockfist
Posts: 2178
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:17 pm
Gender: Male
Location: On the Wings of Death.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (0) vs (0) ATN Starting Soon!!!

Post by rockfist »

Arama86n wrote:Well Caff, here is a fantastic chance to translate chest-thumping to on-paper results. Small war, but still, a win vs S&M would go some way to making a mark.
That god damn massive roster, honestly... I've always felt that TOFU is like a small band of rebels with supply-line problems facing the Galactic Empire...
Yeah, lets go with a Star Wars reference. Josko is definitely Vader. ;)

May the force be with you Caff.
Have fun everyone.


Wait, we could be the post thought bomb Sith, that's an even smaller group....I would want to be Darth Bane if I was a Star Wars character, although I'd probably be some other Sith down the line to be more historically accurate. I'm definitely not a Jedi.

Haven't looked st any of the games but 2-2 is a good start :)
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (3) vs (3) ATN starting

Post by iAmCaffeine »

It's close indeed. I think S&M might have an edge by 1 or 2 games with a couple still undecided, hard to call.
Image
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (3) vs (3) ATN starting

Post by MTIceman41 »

iAmCaffeine wrote:It's close indeed. I think S&M might have an edge by 1 or 2 games with a couple still undecided, hard to call.


I'm feeling a 12-9 match...lots of close games so who knows
Image
MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (11) vs (5) ATN S&M WINS

Post by MTIceman41 »

Congrats to all players for a fun war.
S&M moves on :D
Image
User avatar
rockfist
Posts: 2178
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:17 pm
Gender: Male
Location: On the Wings of Death.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (11) vs (6) ATN S&M WINS

Post by rockfist »

Caff you seem to start out well in wars, proving your initial strength is good maybe you need to work on a higher rep range to build better stamina? I find that I work higher rep in the first part of the year, then low rep for strength in Sept-Dec building up to a 1 rep max in the end of Dec.
Image
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (11) vs (6) ATN S&M WINS

Post by iAmCaffeine »

Haha yeah, against both you and S&M we started well and fell off in the second half. We're gonna be working on that and other things internally after this war since we have nothing scheduled.

Well played S&M.
Image
User avatar
groovysmurf
Head Clan Director
Head Clan Director
Posts: 2860
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:28 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (11) vs (6) ATN S&M WINS

Post by groovysmurf »

Please update the original post to include the war page link as well. Looks great, though. Thank you.


MTIceman41
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: [MWC4] Rd 2: S&M (11) vs (6) ATN S&M WINS

Post by MTIceman41 »

groovysmurf wrote:Please update the original post to include the war page link as well. Looks great, though. Thank you.


Thanks Groovy, done!
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Complete Challenges”