USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Beko the Great
Posts: 802
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Best Score: 3555 pts - 22-11-2014

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Beko the Great »

Well done guys!

One of my favourite maps! :)
User avatar
thenobodies80
Posts: 5400
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Milan

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by thenobodies80 »

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=204301

isaiah40, if you can, I think you should post there and explain your reasons and all the "unsaid things"
I tried but i think nothing would be better than a mapmaker's reply.

thanks
Nobodies
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28213
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Dukasaur »

dolomite13 wrote:Has anyone given any consideration to simply cloning the map and labeling the map "USA 2.2", changing the xml for 40 players, and making this the second Battle Royale map?

I think it could work quite well as one. With this map "USA 2.1" staying an 8 player map.

=D13=

I wonder if this suggestion could be brought to the light of day.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
ManBungalow
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:02 am
Location: On a giant rock orbiting a star somewhere

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by ManBungalow »

A simple graphics improvement could be to put a picture in the background?

It would fit the style of the other USA maps, eg:

[bigimg]http://maps.conquerclub.com/USA_New_England.S.jpg[/bigimg]

It obviously has to be quite faded and in just the right place to not make the map look more cluttered, but it should make it look more appealing and less clinical?
Image
User avatar
Rodion
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Rodion »

I've just realized you have Tucson (Arizona) misspelt.
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by isaiah40 »

Rodion wrote:I've just realized you have Tucson (Arizona) misspelt.

So I do! Unfortunately since I have recently had both my backup and laptop hard drives crash, I have lost all my map files, so this won't be fixed any time soon!
User avatar
dysonsphere
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:00 am
Location: London

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by dysonsphere »

Awful map. A mess of colour where red/blue/green three way combo is all lost on the page. Dreadful.
User avatar
STUDxDOG
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2020 4:49 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by STUDxDOG »

Quick question, and I'm sorry if this is not the place to ask this but this is my first time posting on here. My current game (Game #20015512), I have six capitals occupied, which I believe should reward me with +3 troops. However, I am only getting +1 for holding State Capitals (1). Is this some kind of error on the maps part or am I just misunderstanding something?
User avatar
Mad777
Posts: 9885
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:21 am

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Mad777 »

STUDxDOG wrote:Quick question, and I'm sorry if this is not the place to ask this but this is my first time posting on here. My current game (Game #20015512), I have six capitals occupied, which I believe should reward me with +3 troops. However, I am only getting +1 for holding State Capitals (1). Is this some kind of error on the maps part or am I just misunderstanding something?

I’m not 100% sure but i do believe the Interstate capitals bonus override the bonus you are talking about, I can see you are getting 3 times +2 for holding 2 or more capitals along the same Interstate.
".....Under Phucumol treatment....."
https://youtu.be/zlusWzDY4qw
ZaBeast
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 5:26 pm
Contact:

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by ZaBeast »

Don't trust map inspect for those bonuses, if you check the log, you indeed get +3 for having 6 capitals. Map inspect works fine for straightforward bonuses, but runs into problems with conditionnal borders and other more complicated stuff.
2020-05-27 14:30:24 - STUDxDOG received 3 troops for holding State Capitals
Image
User avatar
STUDxDOG
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2020 4:49 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by STUDxDOG »

ZaBeast wrote:Don't trust map inspect for those bonuses, if you check the log, you indeed get +3 for having 6 capitals. Map inspect works fine for straightforward bonuses, but runs into problems with conditionnal borders and other more complicated stuff.


I do see that now, thank you for helping me learn how to properly read the log instead of the map inspect. My apologies for the mistake!
User avatar
Zerc
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 7:43 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Zerc »

Game #20056005

Trench warfare is on.

2020-06-27 12:26:34 - Killerz999 deployed 18 troops on Great Falls, MT
2020-06-27 12:26:35 - Killerz999 assaulted Calgary from Great Falls, MT and conquered it from neutral player
2020-06-27 12:26:38 - Killerz999 assaulted Tok, AK from Calgary and conquered it from Teranan


Is this intentional? There is no notation on the map saying it should be possible, but I am new so maybe I missed something?
User avatar
HitRed
Posts: 5262
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 12:16 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by HitRed »

Zerc wrote:Game #20056005

Trench warfare is on.

2020-06-27 12:26:34 - Killerz999 deployed 18 troops on Great Falls, MT
2020-06-27 12:26:35 - Killerz999 assaulted Calgary from Great Falls, MT and conquered it from neutral player
2020-06-27 12:26:38 - Killerz999 assaulted Tok, AK from Calgary and conquered it from Teranan


Is this intentional? There is no notation on the map saying it should be possible, but I am new so maybe I missed something?


Yes, you can pass through NEUTALS in a trench game.

HitRed
ZaBeast
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 5:26 pm
Contact:

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by ZaBeast »

HitRed wrote:
Zerc wrote:Game #20056005

Trench warfare is on.

2020-06-27 12:26:34 - Killerz999 deployed 18 troops on Great Falls, MT
2020-06-27 12:26:35 - Killerz999 assaulted Calgary from Great Falls, MT and conquered it from neutral player
2020-06-27 12:26:38 - Killerz999 assaulted Tok, AK from Calgary and conquered it from Teranan


Is this intentional? There is no notation on the map saying it should be possible, but I am new so maybe I missed something?


Yes, you can pass through KILLER NEUTRALS in a trench game.

HitRed

Fixed

Basically since calgary reverts to neutral when held for a turn, there would be no way to get through it if you couldn't attack from it once taken. So as long as you take killer neutrals, you can keep advancing even though it's trench. But as soon as you take one that isn't, you can't do any further attack from it
Image
User avatar
Zerc
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 7:43 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Zerc »

Thank you!
User avatar
JLiverwurst
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2020 9:05 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by JLiverwurst »

Very surprised just now I couldn't find a single post pointing out "Tucson" is misspelled on this map.
User avatar
HitRed
Posts: 5262
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 12:16 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by HitRed »

JLiverwurst wrote:Very surprised just now I couldn't find a single post pointing out "Tucson" is misspelled on this map.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tucson,_Arizona


Tuscon on map

XML reads
2020-12-03 04:18:07 - Waxy assaulted Tuscon, AZ from Las Cruces, NM and conquered it from uglykiwi
Scania N113
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:57 am
Gender: Male

Re: USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Post by Scania N113 »

'Pendleton, OR' is misspelt as 'Pendelton, OR' on the map.
User avatar
degaston
Posts: 989
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:12 am

Re: USA 2.1 Stats bug

Post by degaston »

On the Stats tab, the State Capitals bonus is calculated incorrectly.

It should be +1 for every two capitals, but it never shows more than 1 no matter how many capitals you hold.

The total deploy is correct on the overview page, and when taking a turn, so this does not affect gameplay.
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”