So I looked around a little and found that agentcom, now retired, is 9-0 poly however all of these games featured deadbeats so something IRL probably came up for Josko. However, in teamgames Agent is 8-5, so it still counts?[/quote]josko.ri wrote:[/spoiler]Extreme Ways wrote:I didn't WANT anything. I was just pointing out how your comparison was flawed. And your new comparisons have flaws tooExtreme Ways wrote:Spoiler
[quote="Elaterate"][quote="josko.ri"] You dont want TOTAL map experience but you want map experience at the time when we played more than 10 years ago?
Your team games don't mean shit when calling someone out for "hardly beating you" when they have a 28-32 record in all 1v1 gamesjosko.ri wrote: But, check Don and my team games...
(and in my opinion most 1v1 games that are not Poly don't carry much weight either).
I suggest you act like a grown-up and make your own decisions. The only person that cares is you.josko.ri wrote:Do you suggest that I send him World 21 instead of Cricket?
I'd say that I'm not a homosexual so i'd appreciate you stop saying that. I'm sure there are others on the site that wouldn't mind... but it's kind of creepy in my opinion.josko.ri wrote: What do you say now, my baby?
For what it's worth, while I know that you were simply looking for evidence to counter Josko's claim, it would have been worth a lot more if the counterexample would have been an, with all respect to erazor, accomplished and respected player in the community and preferably also an all-round player.
Versus agentcom 5-8 losing in team games, 0-9 losing in poly but obviously all poly were my deadbeats due to RL struggles. However, in 1v1 i beat him 40-16 so combined 1v1, poly and team games are 45-33 in my favor even when these nine deadbeats are included as agentcom's wins.[/quote]
While 40-16 is statistically relevant, I generally exclude 1v1s from the scores. You're right though, you have a positive record overall.




