11 on 11 is the last number where defender has advantage

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Cronus
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:21 pm
Location: A place where bunnies are not discriminated against for wearing pancakes on their heads.

11 on 11 is the last number where defender has advantage

Post by Cronus »

11 on 11 is the last number at which defender has the advantage (when the 2 territories in question have an equal number) where the attacker wins only 49.4% of the time. At 12 on 12, odds favor the attacker at 50.7%. Attacker has advantage at all numbers greater than this.

Just a random pointless fact.
User avatar
jiminski
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm
Gender: Female
Location: London

Post by jiminski »

cheers, that is quite interesting.
and i like the nappin lapin.
User avatar
alex_white101
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am

Post by alex_white101 »

well then, how come i attacked a 35 on 35 and ended 3 vs 25?!?!?!
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
chessplaya
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Post by chessplaya »

alex_white101 wrote:well then, how come i attacked a 35 on 35 and ended 3 vs 25?!?!?!



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

he said a 50.4% chance to succeed
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
User avatar
alex_white101
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am

Post by alex_white101 »

im still pretty sure the odds of a 35 vs 35 going down to a 3 against 25 are small........... :cry:
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
User avatar
Cronus
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:21 pm
Location: A place where bunnies are not discriminated against for wearing pancakes on their heads.

Post by Cronus »

alex_white101 wrote:im still pretty sure the odds of a 35 vs 35 going down to a 3 against 25 are small........... :cry:


it's approximately 0.02% or a 1 in 5000 chance
BeakerWMA
Posts: 425
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:36 pm
Location: Canada

Post by BeakerWMA »

Better buy a lotto ticket, your luck has to change!
I am serious...and don't call me Shirley.
TipTop
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:18 pm

Post by TipTop »

11 on 11 is the last number at which defender has the advantage (when the 2 territories in question have an equal number) where the attacker wins only 49.4% of the time. At 12 on 12, odds favor the attacker at 50.7%. Attacker has advantage at all numbers greater than this.

Just a random pointless fact.


This makes no sense to me. The advantage is always with the attacker as long as he can throw one dice more than the defender.

He can do this at 4v4 but after the first 3v2 roll the attacker will mostly not be able to do it a 2nd time hence he is still an underdog to take the territory.

5v5 that changes. After the first 3v2 roll the attacker will mostly have the extra dice advantage to the end giving him the edge.

GAMBIT BATTLE ODDS CALCULATOR

2v2 territory defeated by attacker 36.26543%
3v3 territory defeated by attacker 47.02511%
4v4 territory defeated by attacker 47.65309%
5v5 territory defeated by attacker 50.62028%

the odds just get better the higher you go as the extra dice advantage has more time to work

11v11 territory defeated by attacker 57.62945%
35v35 territory defeated by attacker 69.33711%
99v99 territory defeated by attacker 82.30450%

so this shows once you get to 5v5 attack is the best form of defence :)
cpexp
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:06 am

Post by cpexp »

TipTop wrote:
11 on 11 is the last number at which defender has the advantage (when the 2 territories in question have an equal number) where the attacker wins only 49.4% of the time. At 12 on 12, odds favor the attacker at 50.7%. Attacker has advantage at all numbers greater than this.

Just a random pointless fact.


This makes no sense to me. The advantage is always with the attacker as long as he can throw one dice more than the defender.

He can do this at 4v4 but after the first 3v2 roll the attacker will mostly not be able to do it a 2nd time hence he is still an underdog to take the territory.

5v5 that changes. After the first 3v2 roll the attacker will mostly have the extra dice advantage to the end giving him the edge.

GAMBIT BATTLE ODDS CALCULATOR

2v2 territory defeated by attacker 36.26543%
3v3 territory defeated by attacker 47.02511%
4v4 territory defeated by attacker 47.65309%
5v5 territory defeated by attacker 50.62028%

the odds just get better the higher you go as the extra dice advantage has more time to work

11v11 territory defeated by attacker 57.62945%
35v35 territory defeated by attacker 69.33711%
99v99 territory defeated by attacker 82.30450%

so this shows once you get to 5v5 attack is the best form of defence :)


You misunderstood either what Cromus said, or what GAMBIT computes:
11 v 11 has to be converted to 10 v. 11 in GAMBIT, because in GAMBIT you enter only the number of armies you attack with, which is 1 less than the number of armies on the attacking territory.

So your 4 v 4 situation actually occurs when you attack 5 v. 4, not when the number of armies on both countries are 4.
TipTop
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:18 pm

Post by TipTop »

thanks cpexp that is where I went wrong.
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Post by Robinette »

chessplaya wrote:
alex_white101 wrote:well then, how come i attacked a 35 on 35 and ended 3 vs 25?!?!?!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

he said a 50.4% chance to succeed


Which is also a 49.6% chance of failure...

So is the glass half FULL, or half EMPTY ???

For me it all depends on what's IN the glass...
If it's an Ice cold margarita, the glass is half FULL :)
If it's a tepid beer, the glass is definitely half EMPTY :(

Go now, and apply this lesson to your Risk strategy!
Image
User avatar
Blackadder
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:12 pm
Location: Sydney,Australia

Post by Blackadder »

BeakerWMA wrote:Better buy a lotto ticket, your luck has to change!


Nah, they would probably lose that :wink:
eyeofdeath
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:51 pm

Post by eyeofdeath »

Robinette wrote:
chessplaya wrote:
alex_white101 wrote:well then, how come i attacked a 35 on 35 and ended 3 vs 25?!?!?!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

he said a 50.4% chance to succeed


Which is also a 49.6% chance of failure...

So is the glass half FULL, or half EMPTY ???

For me it all depends on what's IN the glass...
If it's an Ice cold margarita, the glass is half FULL :)
If it's a tepid beer, the glass is definitely half EMPTY :(

Go now, and apply this lesson to your Risk strategy!


Your tiny writing frustrates me sometimes.

But that doesn't make sense to me because....

If the liquid was tepid beer, i would want to get rid of it, making it seem like there was too much....there for, half FULL

but that's just me...
User avatar
Bob Janova
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:53 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Bob Janova »

I think you get 3 dice fighting 3vx (even though you can only move 2 armies forward) so 5v5 would be the breakeven point.
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Post by Robinette »

eyeofdeath wrote:
Robinette wrote:
chessplaya wrote:
alex_white101 wrote:well then, how come i attacked a 35 on 35 and ended 3 vs 25?!?!?!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

he said a 50.4% chance to succeed


Which is also a 49.6% chance of failure...

So is the glass half FULL, or half EMPTY ???

For me it all depends on what's IN the glass...
If it's an Ice cold margarita, the glass is half FULL :)
If it's a tepid beer, the glass is definitely half EMPTY :(

Go now, and apply this lesson to your Risk strategy!


Your tiny writing frustrates me sometimes.

But that doesn't make sense to me because....

If the liquid was tepid beer, i would want to get rid of it, making it seem like there was too much....there for, half FULL

but that's just me...


mnnnn... never thought of it that way....
I am pretty quick to dump a tepid beer, so to me it is on it's way to being empty...
While I will slowly sip and savor the perfect half full glass...

Can I get your thoughts on adjusting an air conditioner...
Do you turn it UP to mean RAISE the temperature????
Or do you go UP to go DOWN.... :-k

where is that ice cold margarita when I really need it?
Image
User avatar
Cronus
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:21 pm
Location: A place where bunnies are not discriminated against for wearing pancakes on their heads.

Post by Cronus »

Bob Janova wrote:I think you get 3 dice fighting 3vx (even though you can only move 2 armies forward) so 5v5 would be the breakeven point.


what?

1. defender get max of 2 dice
2. it's not a thought, it is a fact that 11 on 11 is the break point. This isn't a debate.
User avatar
Petrelli4Prez
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:42 pm
Location: Utah

Post by Petrelli4Prez »

Robinette wrote:
Can I get your thoughts on adjusting an air conditioner...
Do you turn it UP to mean RAISE the temperature????
Or do you go UP to go DOWN.... :-k

where is that ice cold margarita when I really need it?


I turn UP the AC for the temperature to go down. :mrgreen:
User avatar
Atarihero
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:16 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Atarihero »

Robinette wrote:So is the glass half FULL, or half EMPTY ???

If half the container has water, I have water. :wink:
User avatar
rsuttles58
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 7:16 pm

Post by rsuttles58 »

I've got a question along these lines. It's about dice odds.

So I was playing a game with friends last night who aren't the best of players.

I lost THREE battles where I was attacked by someone that had less troops than I had defending the territory.

1. The first one was just asinine. The guy attacked me in a 3v7 situation and WON without losing a single troop. He took that territory and then attacked with his 2 troops and broke my bonus on a territory behind it.

2. The other notable one was in a situation where I had 25 troops defending a territory and a guy attacked me with 18 troops. He won with 6 troops left over.

Did I just have the luck of the Jews here or are the odds really THAT much in favor of the attacker? My friends tried telling me that their attacking armies had the favorable odds when attacking in these situations. I actually called my girlfriend to make sure I wasn't losing my mind.
AAFitz
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Post by AAFitz »

rsuttles58 wrote:I've got a question along these lines. It's about dice odds.

So I was playing a game with friends last night who aren't the best of players.

I lost THREE battles where I was attacked by someone that had less troops than I had defending the territory.

1. The first one was just asinine. The guy attacked me in a 3v7 situation and WON without losing a single troop. He took that territory and then attacked with his 2 troops and broke my bonus on a territory behind it.

2. The other notable one was in a situation where I had 25 troops defending a territory and a guy attacked me with 18 troops. He won with 6 troops left over.

Did I just have the luck of the Jews here or are the odds really THAT much in favor of the attacker? My friends tried telling me that their attacking armies had the favorable odds when attacking in these situations. I actually called my girlfriend to make sure I wasn't losing my mind.


the 3 to 7 attack is very rare, but it does occasionally happen, the 18 to 24 is a very wise attack to make if you have nothing to lose....id much rather make the attack than let the 24 butcher my 18...
Grisle
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:11 am
Location: Modesto, Ca

Post by Grisle »

alex_white101 wrote:well then, how come i attacked a 35 on 35 and ended 3 vs 25?!?!?!


You should have never let your armies get that low.
rondosocal
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:36 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Southern California

Post by rondosocal »

Thank you. Excellent bit of data.
User avatar
calkid
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:21 am
Gender: Male

cronus....

Post by calkid »

if you are good at figuring out odds, i would like a breakdown of the odds when there is the same amount of armie on each territory. include the extra dice for the attatcker and the tie(WIN) for the defender. i would like to see a breakdown from 1vs 1 TO 15 vs 15 instead of just stating the odds. i want to know how you come up with that.
TipTop
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:18 pm

Re: cronus....

Post by TipTop »

calkid wrote:if you are good at figuring out odds, i would like a breakdown of the odds when there is the same amount of armie on each territory. include the extra dice for the attatcker and the tie(WIN) for the defender. i would like to see a breakdown from 1vs 1 TO 15 vs 15 instead of just stating the odds. i want to know how you come up with that.



Just use this http://gamesbyemail.com/Games/Gambit/BattleOdds
User avatar
Cynther
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 11 on 11 is the last number where defender has advantage

Post by Cynther »

Robinette wrote:
chessplaya wrote:
alex_white101 wrote:well then, how come i attacked a 35 on 35 and ended 3 vs 25?!?!?!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

he said a 50.4% chance to succeed




Which is also a 49.6% chance of failure...



So is the glass half FULL, or half EMPTY ???

For me it all depends on what's IN the glass...
If it's an Ice cold margarita, the glass is half FULL :)
If it's a tepid beer, the glass is definitely half EMPTY :(

Go now, and apply this lesson to your Risk strategy!


Well if he says the situation ended with 3 vs. 25, technically he didn't fail. He still has a possibility of winning the territory. It's all about believing =)
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”