torres44cm & suzieq51 [ka]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Post Reply
User avatar
threex12
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:01 pm
Location: England

torres44cm & suzieq51 [ka]

Post by threex12 »

>

Accused:

torres44cm
suzieq51




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

[game]#22220389[/game]



Comments:

Very suspecious style of play between these two ...

... over 700+ games between them, a lot of grumbling in the comments about their one sided play ...

... a suspeciously large amount of wins for torres44cm when they play together, significantly less when they don't ...

... It seems to me that they have hit upon a method that is extremly hard to prove, nevertheless I can't help feeling that I've been conned, if only because of the odd lack of aggression between them and the seemingly lack of pressure they apply to each other once they clear out an area of everybody else.

I won't allow them in my games again regardless.
User avatar
iAmCaffeine
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: torres44cm & suzieq51

Post by iAmCaffeine »

not the first time they've been reported. pretty sure they're a married couple or something. no idea why they're allowed to play together. granted they're both terrible but still.
Image
sdh
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:43 am

Re: torres44cm & suzieq51

Post by sdh »

It looks pretty suspicious :lol:

Just look at 1v1 games with the two of them. torres44cm has won 74 from 77 on basic maps
king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
Posts: 13392
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: torres44cm & suzieq51

Post by king achilles »

The accused have been blocked from playing together.
User avatar
threex12
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:01 pm
Location: England

Re: torres44cm & suzieq51 [ka]

Post by threex12 »

I want my points back.
torres44cm
Posts: 576
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 5:15 pm

Re: torres44cm & suzieq51 [ka]

Post by torres44cm »

After all these years of playing here on CC, you mods have gotten crazy, banning husbands and wives from playing together. You all invent rules that take the fun out playing CC, the comments about me winning so many games against my wife has no relevance. and so what if some think we play poorly. There are so many friends and family members that play here, both against each other and joining the same games, that nobody ever cared and its ridiculous that cc makes this an issue. We didn't manipulate the leader board or break any rules. You all can stick CC up your arse, So we cancelled my auto membership and I'm done after 13 years.
Image
Nut Shot Scott
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm

Re: torres44cm & suzieq51 [ka]

Post by Nut Shot Scott »

I mean. If you play 1 v 1, who cares. If you play as a team in team games, who cares. If you create private games with your friends and family, who cares.

But when you play multiplayer games together, and you play them essentially as a team to the point that you win an inordinate number of games in those specific situations, then it's an issue for the other players. You join a game assuming that everyone is on the up and up. There is a pattern of you two essentially having an unwritten pact (or agreed upon, who knows?) that you basically attempt to rig the games to benefit you two. The reality is, you are negatively impacting the experience of others. So you COULD just say you know, maybe we should play the games straight up OR just don't play those specific game styles with strangers. You've popped up here multiple times - seems as though it's a known issue to you and you just refuse tochange
Image
User avatar
Shannon Apple
Chatter
Chatter
Posts: 2182
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:40 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Ireland

Re: torres44cm & suzieq51 [ka]

Post by Shannon Apple »

Nut Shot Scott wrote:I mean. If you play 1 v 1, who cares. If you play as a team in team games, who cares. If you create private games with your friends and family, who cares.

But when you play multiplayer games together, and you play them essentially as a team to the point that you win an inordinate number of games in those specific situations, then it's an issue for the other players. You join a game assuming that everyone is on the up and up. There is a pattern of you two essentially having an unwritten pact (or agreed upon, who knows?) that you basically attempt to rig the games to benefit you two. The reality is, you are negatively impacting the experience of others. So you COULD just say you know, maybe we should play the games straight up OR just don't play those specific game styles with strangers. You've popped up here multiple times - seems as though it's a known issue to you and you just refuse tochange
THIS!

Like, you COULD have played 12 player doubles together, which is fair. You have the same number of players, except that everyone knows you are teamed.

No one would have bothered to report you, or even realised you were husband and wife if you were playing fairly. No one cares who is playing together, or against each other, if they are playing impartially, even if they're a couple.

If I was playing with friends, I'd be just as ruthless to them as anyone else on the board. If you can't do that or it causes arguments, Torres, stick to team games. A friend once invited me to a multiplayer game, and then he Skypes me "Oh wow, didn't think you'd go after me like that." And I said "Every woman for herself." He was in my way, I had my sights on winning. :lol:
00:33:53 ‹riskllama› will her and i ever hook up, LLT???
00:34:09 ‹LiveLoveTeach› You and Shannon?
00:34:20 ‹LiveLoveTeach› Bahahahahahaha
00:34:22 ‹LiveLoveTeach› I doubt it
00:34:30 ‹LiveLoveTeach› I don't think she's into farm animals
Post Reply

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”