Moderator: Community Team
FYI: Several players asked extra info, had questions..hjelp wrote:I asked from the start, and the choice to qoute or rewrite is my own choice, and I understood that as ok if I did.Ragian wrote:Yikes. You should probably read rule 3 (or is it 4?), prohibiting you from quoting mod PMs
So this is another confirmation that Halrob is town.hjelp wrote:Since I'm L-2,
I'm town and my role is Sleepwalker. Added to that is
"Town Surveillance Analyst"
At the end of the night when all other night actions are in You receive anonymous (but 100% accurate) reports when a town investigator has hit scum, even when the investigation returned a false result due to Godfather immunity or framing to the investigator or other conditions that tampered with the the investigator's result (i.e., the investigator himself did not actually detect scum) BUT only if the investigator survives the night. The investigator needs to be alive to file the report.
Once per game you can audit a killed investigators action to see what the result of the investigator was (works only on tracker and cop roles)..
Important:
The report is anonymous: it will not say which investigator performed the action that triggered the report.
The report does not reveal the identity of the scum-targeted player — only that a scum was succesfully targeted by investigator action(s) that night.
The Analyst's check uses true alignment, not investigation output. In other words, the Analyst triggers only when an investigator actually visited a Mafia member, regardless of what the investigator’s read looked like.
If an investigator was roleblocked before acting, or their visit was redirected so they did not actually target a scum, that does not count (no report).
I didn't get any report N1.
Devon99 wrote:Wakey wakey people, your suspicions of me are based on my/kingm's 50% Cop claim and past interactions. I want to clarify my position now so everyone can make an informed vote. I was hoping to keep my role secret, until such time as it actually became useful.
But on 4 votes you have forced my hand, so I’ll clarify: I’m a backup Cop of sorts — hence the consistant 50% vanilla claim. I'm still vanilla and will be until certain conditions have been met.
When that happens i get to "audit" the town cop cases but only every other night. I'm the FBI investigator.
I will choose to believe hjelp over Devon. Main reason being the "every other night" part which I reiterate is consistent with the 50% claims etc from kingm but isn't the most logical for a backup role, as those only activate later on anyway.Devon99 wrote:So full clarity that means that I (the FBI) do not get called in to investigate unless the primary Cop is "unable to act" — either because:
the Cop dies,
or the Cop can no longer do it's duty". I have no clue what that means but if that happens i'll be informed and have cop and "audit" powers. Auditing the cops cases (his night investigations) i can only do "on every other night", (starting the second night of my investigative powers).
On the nights I’m doing the audit I’ll be informed whether the Cop’s earlier result was accurate or inaccurate — that is, "if the player’s true guilt matched what the Cop was told". Example: “I’m auditing the Cop’s Night 1 investigation.” I will then receive a full report on the cop's night 1 target.
So with Charle alive and producing results, I’m basically a failsafe.
If scum kills or "gets to Charle" (whatever that means), I take over and have the power to save town.
My read on the current pushes :
Devante’s immediate 180 pivot after Charle’s claim felt like panic, not analysis.
Loose Canon is theory-spamming and doesn’t match a stable Town thought process — that’s more “trying to see what sticks.”
Ragian always lightly accuses someone, then immediately softens or walks it back. Textbook hedging.
EW has some superpower that he got Charle the cop right out of 10 in the first night? Why did he ward Charle?
And honestly, since everyone wants to talk about “suspicious behavior,” can we address the giant hole in the thread right now?
BUT Where is Darin? Darin’s slot is way scummier than people are giving it credit for.
We’re going in circles over people who at least posted, while Darin has contributed absolutely nothing meaningful. No reads, no reactions, no stance on the Cop situation — nothing.
The only people who gain from this level of invisibility in a claim war are the ones who already know the flip outcomes.
Town needs information to work through claims.
Scum and 3P don’t.
And Darin is playing like someone who doesn’t need to solve anything, so get onboard with this townies.
Vote Darin
The problem is, people are claiming roles and its easy to doubt them.Extreme Ways wrote:For tomorrow, what I think we should have done today is just have everyone claim their role (and please with paraphrasing, not with copying mod PMs. It's already hard enough to play scum).
Could you elaborate on that, please?Devante wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 3:24 pm We need a lynch and devon/darin are both on my potential scum list but devons claim doesn't ring true to me so VOTE DEVON
I'm not buying the back-up role 50% bit. A back-up role would normally follow the same attributes of the role it is backing up and we haven't gotten any indication of that. also the back-up bit only came up once there was no n1 & n2 reports
FYI : The way i read it was that he has the same attributes of the role he is back-up for, just with an extra... the extra is the PR "audit" powerDevante wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 4:09 pmI'm not buying the back-up role 50% bit. A back-up role would normally follow the same attributes of the role it is backing up and we haven't gotten any indication of that. also the back-up bit only came up once there was no n1 & n2 reports
) : SEND THEM IN!! 
