Mushroom Kingdom - Day 4! --Banana-- Peeled!

kingwaffles · Post by **kingwaffles** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:09 pm

The loooong day finally comes to a close with Andy pulling out a noose...

The group gathers around Max as he screams for help and as he is strung up from the nearest tree he begins to glow and his identity is revealed as....

Starman, Vanilla Townie hangs shining from the tree....

Lets have some night choices!

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:57 pm

I know that it's night and I shouldnt be talking, but I had to put this back onto the first page!

kingwaffles · Post by **kingwaffles** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:17 pm

Thanks for that Mach, i probably never would never have been able to find it.....

As the residents of Mushroom Kingdom wakes up Haydena seems to have disapeared. Everyone goes looking for her and they finnally find her crumpled up next to the the phone in her house, with blood splattered across the room and all over her dress. The phone lies off the hook almost as if she was talking to someone right before she died.......

Haydena, Peach, Mason(Pro Town) has lost her last life.....

Day 3! Let's get voting!

Banana Stomper · Post by **Banana Stomper** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 3:49 pm

Ok, seeing as how quickly the mafia came up with their victim for the night. I'm going to say i'm leaning toward the more active players instead of our earlier calls to go after the silent bunch. We have a lot of people, (i think) who aren't putting in any info and who didn't respond at calls to be replaced or whatever. I think it has to be someone involved in the game enough to be keeping up on it. I'm not really sure who's alive at this point and who's been talking, but i think there are still people who haven't been keeping up on the game or paying attention. I guess i could be wrong on that, but i'm sure someone will correct me if that is the case.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 3:51 pm

Banana Stomper wrote:Ok, seeing as how quickly the mafia came up with their victim for the night. I'm going to say i'm leaning toward the more active players instead of our earlier calls to go after the silent bunch. We have a lot of people, (i think) who aren't putting in any info and who didn't respond at calls to be replaced or whatever. I think it has to be someone involved in the game enough to be keeping up on it. I'm not really sure who's alive at this point and who's been talking, but i think there are still people who haven't been keeping up on the game or paying attention. I guess i could be wrong on that, but i'm sure someone will correct me if that is the case.

that sounds noble.

Pilate · Post by **Pilate** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:26 pm

Banana Stomper wrote:Ok, seeing as how quickly the mafia came up with their victim for the night. I'm going to say i'm leaning toward the more active players instead of our earlier calls to go after the silent bunch. We have a lot of people, (i think) who aren't putting in any info and who didn't respond at calls to be replaced or whatever. I think it has to be someone involved in the game enough to be keeping up on it. I'm not really sure who's alive at this point and who's been talking, but i think there are still people who haven't been keeping up on the game or paying attention. I guess i could be wrong on that, but i'm sure someone will correct me if that is the case.

I agree

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:05 am

I do think you are on to something, but then Pilate posting above me counter proves that even those that don't post much like him, are still around and watching and paying attention.

--Andy

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:42 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:
Banana Stomper wrote:Ok, seeing as how quickly the mafia came up with their victim for the night. I'm going to say i'm leaning toward the more active players instead of our earlier calls to go after the silent bunch. We have a lot of people, (i think) who aren't putting in any info and who didn't respond at calls to be replaced or whatever. I think it has to be someone involved in the game enough to be keeping up on it. I'm not really sure who's alive at this point and who's been talking, but i think there are still people who haven't been keeping up on the game or paying attention. I guess i could be wrong on that, but i'm sure someone will correct me if that is the case.

that sounds noble.

It's ironic that you would say that :lol:

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:54 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
Banana Stomper wrote:Ok, seeing as how quickly the mafia came up with their victim for the night. I'm going to say i'm leaning toward the more active players instead of our earlier calls to go after the silent bunch. We have a lot of people, (i think) who aren't putting in any info and who didn't respond at calls to be replaced or whatever. I think it has to be someone involved in the game enough to be keeping up on it. I'm not really sure who's alive at this point and who's been talking, but i think there are still people who haven't been keeping up on the game or paying attention. I guess i could be wrong on that, but i'm sure someone will correct me if that is the case.

that sounds noble.

It's ironic that you would say that

it's better logic.

Banana Stomper · Post by **Banana Stomper** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:10 pm

why's it ironic? just to clarify for my sake, heh.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 6:44 pm

I think I missed something to, Banana.

--Andy

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:25 pm

It's ironic that Kyle would say that we should target the more active players, because he is one of them.

Banana- You were thinking in the right direction but there could be people lurking, which means that they are watching the game but not posting, a few pages back Andy thought this was the case.

Darkfire001 · Post by **Darkfire001** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:36 am

Yah people are still lurking << but also wish we could sticky this.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 2:39 pm

Then I'd have to sticky all sorts of off topic threads. It's either all, or none. And since none of these threads are officially endorsed by CC, we'll have to keep bumping it.

--Andy

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:24 pm

C'mon andy, you know you love us enough..

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:47 pm

Sure sure. I love everyone...

Anyways, what would be the reason of taking out Haydena? His last posts were on page 13....and his last post said

I think that voting for the silent ones is the best option, voting for action pushers will get us nowhere as we will have no-one actually trying to reveal information.

Not something that exactly helps. So what is the point behind Haydena being gone? A random pick or were other motives used?

--Andy

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:55 pm

Good point andy.. you have mafia like intelligence :wink:

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:35 pm

I think that it's a valid point. I see where Kyle is coming from with the other comment although to me Andy seems like the kind of person who would reread the game for further clues. In mafia forums everyone rereads the game more than once, I guess people are just lazier on CC :roll:

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:28 pm

Bump.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:07 am

Machiavelli wrote:I think that it's a valid point. I see where Kyle is coming from with the other comment although to me Andy seems like the kind of person who would reread the game for further clues. In mafia forums everyone rereads the game more than once, I guess people are just lazier on CC

Or too busy playing risk, I'd hate to kill andy off though in case he isnt... He seems like the one who is able to spot them the most.. He seems he'd be the most help.

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:16 am

Flip floppin' are we Kyle :wink:

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:52 am

Well I was just saying, thats not enough to convict and If we arent sure I'd hate to lose our most attentive player.

Pilate · Post by **Pilate** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:19 am

pick the top 3 players and vote them off systematically

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:00 pm

Awww, good to know I'm so loved here.

Pilate, what do you mean by 'top three players'? Care to elaborate more? hehe, maybe this will get you posting more with us.

--Andy

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:50 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:Awww, good to know I'm so loved here.

Pilate, what do you mean by 'top three players'? Care to elaborate more? hehe, maybe this will get you posting more with us.

--Andy

I was curious about it too