Conquer Club

yeti_c wrote:I wonder what I'll be getting in the 3 or so games where I "missed" a turn - i.e. the server didn't bother giving me a turn!!

C.

I missed about 30 turns cos' of the downtime so I don't even want to think what some lamers are gonna leave me :'(

But yea...this is definately a flaw in the system. There are people leaving crap ratings for no reason and people crying about getting 4s...I left some guy 4-5-5 and he asked me to remove it like wtf :/

happy2seeyou wrote:I got a one for attendance when I never missed a turn... wtf?

Wait... so you mean # 1 is the bottom... sorry about taht (damn Dyslexia)

It is nothing short of disgraceful the way this has all been set up.

Quite simply, the stars should be issued according to rank. No one lower than a Major should ever receive more than 4 stars. No one lower than an Officer should receive anything more than 3 stars. No one lower than a 2 striper should receive anything more than 2 stars, cooks and other great unwashed should get 1 star each.

This way the natural order of things is preserved, Ranking status quo is maintained and the hoi polloi obviously marked.

i got a bad attendence rating from someone but when i pmed them to inquire about it, they said they got me mixed up with someone else, and they fixed it.

and lets face it, there will always be jerks that will leave bad ratings, but i like the way that even the 1 bad rating i had still had me at a good rating overall, because ive been rated enough to where 1 doesnt make a lick of difference.

Fruitcake wrote:It is nothing short of disgraceful the way this has all been set up.

Quite simply, the stars should be issued according to rank. No one lower than a Major should ever receive more than 4 stars. No one lower than an Officer should receive anything more than 3 stars. No one lower than a 2 striper should receive anything more than 2 stars, cooks and other great unwashed should get 1 star each.

This way the natural order of things is preserved, Ranking status quo is maintained and the hoi polloi obviously marked.

Seconded.

Timminz wrote:

Fruitcake wrote:It is nothing short of disgraceful the way this has all been set up.

Quite simply, the stars should be issued according to rank. No one lower than a Major should ever receive more than 4 stars. No one lower than an Officer should receive anything more than 3 stars. No one lower than a 2 striper should receive anything more than 2 stars, cooks and other great unwashed should get 1 star each.

This way the natural order of things is preserved, Ranking status quo is maintained and the hoi polloi obviously marked.

Seconded.

give me a plate of thirds...-0

That rating medal was probably a mistake. This guy who left me a 3 for every section has also done the same for...52 other people, some of which missed turns. Oh well.

Edit: is anyone rating people properly?

Robinette wrote:Wait... so you mean # 1 is the bottom... sorry about taht (damn Dyslexia)

No, number one comes out the bottom!

what,me worry? wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:

GoVegan wrote:Wow an admitted multi.

Hunters anyone?

Wtf? How can I put this in a language that you will understand? I only play with one account!!!!!!

My old account is dead! hello?!?!?!?!? how thick are some folk... seriously...

So you have two accounts........ do the math. rules are you can only have one. where's FP when you need him. lol

And im not signing either. although i agree with a hybrid.

right here's my position... I AM only using this account... my other account is djjcuk would u please find alll games that I have played with this account. That will prove I do not play with it any more. Find all the games with me in them and you will see that none of them have my other account in them. GO ON! Look it all up! If it will get you off my back! What would you like me to do about my other account?!?!?!? Delete it? I dont want to go on it coz then it will register as bein active and you guys will all accuse me of cheating. Well? What do you want me to do!?!?!?!?!?! Cheeses sliced!!

sunmachines wrote:I'll sign it. I played one game under the new system and got three stars for attendance where I missed no turns. I also received three stars for attitude in which no one said a word the whole game. If you miss no turns your attendance rating should be 5! If you never say anything how can you have "an attitude?" Ridiculous.

No - your attendance was average, which is what it states. Typically people don't miss turns. Therefore you did nothing out of the ordinary. You'd get a 3 from me as well.

HERE WE GO... LAST GAME MY OTHER ACCOUNT (djjcuk) PLAYED WAS GAME 73582 (2006-09-25 05:27:23 LAST CHAT POST IN THAT GAME BY djjcuk) funnily enough that was the day before my 17th birthday... and I'm going to be 19 in 3 or 4 months... check it out for yourselves guys... maybe perhaps you will show me a bit more respect. If you want please delete my other account...

I gave the wrong person a 1 for attendance and hte poor bugger pm'ed me. I went to change the rating and it was archived. Sorry dude

my ratings go down every game for no reason and some people just hand out cap ratings just to get the medal is ther any way we can stop this???

2008-06-17 13:48:11 - btown80: server is pissing me off today
2008-06-17 13:50:04 - XsaladX: same lol
2008-06-17 13:55:44 - XsaladX: total bullshit 17 on 5 and i lose
2008-06-17 13:58:01 - btown80: look at the board salad, i am deploying 14, blue is deploying over 30, be smart
2008-06-17 13:58:09 - btown80: yeah, 50,
2008-06-17 13:58:16 - btown80: you are such a bad player salad
2008-06-17 13:59:01 - XsaladX: rright i am u know because i git hit bu u every turn right im the fucin terrible player
2008-06-17 13:59:46 - XsaladX: every turn u hit me and almost killed me i actualy tried to hit blue so f*ck off
2008-06-17 13:59:58 - btown80: not my fault you lost a 17vs5 so don't come at me, but when i am deploying 14 vs blues 50, common sense tells you who to hit and who not to
2008-06-17 14:01:14 - XsaladX: hey buddy i tried to hit blue but i got bad dice just like when i hit u ok so just f*ck off and stop blaming ur fuckin lack of common sense on me

yeah.. inexplicable

LOL. I got a 1-1-1 for this game: Game 2636954 by [player]Avalon Knight[/player].

On the one hand, it's funny, one the other hand, what the hell was that all about?

I believe that people who haven't played at least 100 games should be allowed to hand out ratings.

XsaladX wrote:my ratings go down every game for no reason and some people just hand out cap ratings just to get the medal is ther any way we can stop this???

???

AAFitz wrote:2008-06-17 13:48:11 - btown80: server is pissing me off today
2008-06-17 13:50:04 - XsaladX: same lol
2008-06-17 13:55:44 - XsaladX: total bullshit 17 on 5 and i lose
2008-06-17 13:58:01 - btown80: look at the board salad, i am deploying 14, blue is deploying over 30, be smart
2008-06-17 13:58:09 - btown80: yeah, 50,
2008-06-17 13:58:16 - btown80: you are such a bad player salad
2008-06-17 13:59:01 - XsaladX: rright i am u know because i git hit bu u every turn right im the fucin terrible player2008-06-17 13:59:46 - XsaladX: every turn u hit me and almost killed me i actualy tried to hit blue so f*ck off
2008-06-17 13:59:58 - btown80: not my fault you lost a 17vs5 so don't come at me, but when i am deploying 14 vs blues 50, common sense tells you who to hit and who not to
2008-06-17 14:01:14 - XsaladX: hey buddy i tried to hit blue but i got bad dice just like when i hit u ok so just f*ck off and stop blaming ur fuckin lack of common sense on me

No reason?
Did you by chance happen to read your chat?

Personally, I would not have given you all 1's ... but you would definitely not have gotten a 5 for attitude.

Granted, neither one of you would have ...
I am not telling you how to play or act, but you posted here in the forum, complaining,
which means that you felt this was an extraordinarily aggregious rating ... and, the thing is, I believe most folks would say it was pretty close to reasonable. Not perfect, perhaps, but reasonable.

(not sure why the 1's for attendance unless you missed turns or such...)

happy2seeyou wrote:I got a one for attendance when I never missed a turn... wtf?

Same here, and with attendance, and fair play. When there wasnt another problem from anybody else

scrap the ratings and restore the old feedback system

wcaclimbing wrote:I like the rating system just how it is.

Stars make it much more simple for me, feedback was too much work.
So, sign me up for the "don't change the system again, I like the ratings and want them to stay exactly as they are" petition, if there is such a thing.

Usually don't disagree with you, wc, but nobody made you enter feedback under the old system. Laziness is your prerogative: embrace it, cherish it, but don't force it on me.

New system is crap. Consider me signed on.

JoshyBoy wrote:HERE WE GO... LAST GAME MY OTHER ACCOUNT (djjcuk) PLAYED WAS GAME 73582 (2006-09-25 05:27:23 LAST CHAT POST IN THAT GAME BY djjcuk) funnily enough that was the day before my 17th birthday... and I'm going to be 19 in 3 or 4 months... check it out for yourselves guys... maybe perhaps you will show me a bit more respect. If you want please delete my other account...

correction... Feb 17, 2007 was the last action.

But that was still over a year before you launched this account.

Couple of questions for you:
1) What account name did you use during that year gap?
2) Are there any more accounts that you played under?
3) Why did you feel you needed to start a new account?
4) Do you realize you could have continued to use the old account?
5) Did you know what you did was a violation of the only iron-clad rule on this site?

Just noticed that all but one of my non-5 star ratings are from sgt 1st or less...just fyi...

ParadiceCity9 wrote:Just noticed that all but one of my non-5 star ratings are from sgt 1st or less...just fyi...

So if anyone wants all 5's just play higher ranking players.

I liked the old feedback system much better, but I do like the five day waiting period in usse now before ratings are posted. If we had that five day waiting period for feedback, it would result in not having any revenge feedback. Bring back the feedback, but keep the five day waiting period for feedback to be posted.

sunmachines wrote:I'll sign it. I played one game under the new system and got three stars for attendance where I missed no turns. I also received three stars for attitude in which no one said a word the whole game. If you miss no turns your attendance rating should be 5! If you never say anything how can you have "an attitude?" Ridiculous.

Rating Attributes

Fair Play: covers suiciding, secret alliance suspicion, breaking or respecting alliances, chivalry, etc...
Attendance: covers deadbeating, missing turns, deliberately prolonging rounds, finding a babysitter to keep things moving, etc...
Attitude: covers behaviour in chat, foul language, sore losers, gracious winners, "great chatters!", whining about dice, etc...
Teamwork: covers playing with teammates - coordination, communication, etc...

The number of stars given should be based on this scale: 1 = Bad, 2 = Below Average, 3 = Average, 4 = Above Average, 5 = Excellent.
so since nothing was said and no turns were missed you feel both these areas were above average or excellent? Sounds like an ordinary average game to me.

Robinette wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:HERE WE GO... LAST GAME MY OTHER ACCOUNT (djjcuk) PLAYED WAS GAME 73582 (2006-09-25 05:27:23 LAST CHAT POST IN THAT GAME BY djjcuk) funnily enough that was the day before my 17th birthday... and I'm going to be 19 in 3 or 4 months... check it out for yourselves guys... maybe perhaps you will show me a bit more respect. If you want please delete my other account...

correction... Feb 17, 2007 was the last action.

But that was still over a year before you launched this account.

Couple of questions for you:
1) What account name did you use during that year gap?
2) Are there any more accounts that you played under?
3) Why did you feel you needed to start a new account?
4) Do you realize you could have continued to use the old account?
5) Did you know what you did was a violation of the only iron-clad rule on this site?

Oh ok then fair enough lol didnt know how to accurately check my activity I just looked at the last game I played. Answers.

1) I WASNT PLAYING DURING THE GAP YEAR.
2) NO, THERE ARE NO OTHER ACCOUNTS I PLAYED UNDER.
3) BECAUSE I WASNT HAPPY WITH THE NAME djjcuk (THAT WAS A YEAR AGO) I NOW AM KNOWN TO ALL MY FRIENDS AS JOSHY BOY.
4) YES I DOBUT I THOUGH IT BEST NOT TO TOUCH IT.
5) I DID NOT THINK I WAS VIOLATING THE RULES AS I HAVE ONLY ONE ACTIVE ACCOUNT.

As I have said I am willing to let my djjcuk account be deleted by CC. I can assure you that I only have 1 active account. Dont know how to prove this but I'm sure that if you go through all my games on this account you will see that there is NO CHEATING on my part.

Anything else?