Fruitcake wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:lol Fc, all I was trying to do to is show back then over a year ago was how you fruitcake teamed with cooks to get colonel and brig status and high relative rank where many on cc never had to revert to that to reach those scores!
When you get close to conqueror, well, that is a whole different animal all together, the comparisons you and a few others are trying to make are not even in the same universe, they are galaxies away.
This is evidenced by the number of players that have hit those ranks throughout history. The higher you go up the more scarce it becomes, so when a player reaches that high of a score and your goal is conqueror, you have no choice but to try to level the playing field some in score to make it fair, it is only common sense.
As usual Blitz, you are trying to get away from the core issue.
So here is a simple yes/no question.
Are you now using the very same tactic which you denigrated in the thread from which bones so succinctly pulls your quotes?
As a reminder here are the quotes:Bones2484 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:lol Fc, how old is that quote? over 2 years?
Actually it was last February in this thread.
You have a lot of great quotes in there that are hilarious to read in hindsight.Blitzaholic wrote:funny how you get a new player who is a noob to come a long every few months to team with you and win a ton to jack up your score, then few months later, you recruit another one, so on and so forth.Blitzaholic wrote:it is quite easy to manipulate that when you have a cook join your team in many of your games fruitcake (like you have done) and you give them direction of plans on what to do every turn, its like you playing both accounts practically but within the rules, but it is a manipulation as you will not lose as many points for losing, and you win more for winning.Blitzaholic wrote:You fruitcake more than anyone team with cooks to exaggerate you relative rank, which is a little flawed and fruity if you ask me.Blitzaholic wrote:the fact is you can team with cooks and tell them every move and manipulate your relative rank, and many others will start doing this if your suggestion is implemented.Blitzaholic wrote:but when one is constantly teaming with new players over and over again [...] with scores of 500 to 1000 and there are many you have done this with, it raises an eyebrow is all.
It's amazing that you can't just admit your hypocrisy. The evidence is overflowing!
I answered it, if you read my post, here it is again.
lol Fc, all I was trying to do to is show back then over a year ago was how you fruitcake teamed with cooks to get colonel and brig status and high relative rank where many on cc never had to revert to that to reach those scores!
When you get close to conqueror, well, that is a whole different animal all together, the comparisons you and a few others are trying to make are not even in the same universe, they are galaxies away.
This is evidenced by the number of players that have hit those ranks throughout history. The higher you go up the more scarce it becomes, so when a player reaches that high of a score and your goal is conqueror, you have no choice but to try to level the playing field some in score to make it fair, it is only common sense.
Let me simplify it so your fragile brain can comprehend Fc, 1st off relative rank and conqueror are not the same, it is like people going to school, some go into 1st grade and some go into their freshman year of college, yes, the people are still going to school, but, it is not the same school or grade. Yet, you and others are yelling, it is the same blitz, you are both going to school.
But, it is on a different level and not the exact same. It is similar as far as school goes, but again, they are galaxies away as nette said sagan would be happy. 
? 
good luck!
