Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:43 am
5 man games
Just a thought Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://rzmhprwww.conquerclub.com/forum2/
[Complete] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
http://rzmhprwww.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=126871
Page 8 of 9
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:46 am
Hmmm? One other consideration: Perhaps one of the 5 man games could be by Shoop, moop, Krissan, Phil, and Patrickaa317 since they were all the winners of their game # 7778950 Just a thought
Just a thought Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:51 am
critchous wrote:LOL,
Two 5 man games
thx
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:32 am
Removed.
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:37 am
Thanks for the encouragement derivative, I expected to hear from you on this.
I will allow voting until 5am EST tomorrow then set the games in motion.
I want to be as fair as possible to all you guys.
I will allow voting until 5am EST tomorrow then set the games in motion.
I want to be as fair as possible to all you guys.
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 8:24 am
two 5 man games
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:08 am
Sent: Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:01 am
by caymanmew
2
by caymanmew
2
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:48 am
I vote for 2 5 man games
Thanks
Thanks
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:54 am
5 man game.
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:44 am
Sent: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:06 am
From: el simondo
To: oldrisky44
still going with option 2
lol
From: el simondo
To: oldrisky44
still going with option 2
lol
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:50 am
I vote option 2
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:58 am
pick from the losers of round 1.
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:01 am
i guess two five man games.
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:17 am
I go with 2 5 man games.
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:11 pm
I vote for option 2 (2 five players games)
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:16 pm
I'll vote for random draw
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:45 pm
5 player games for me.
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:53 pm
option 2: random from losers of round 1
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:28 pm
Sent: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:58 pm
From: Preditor
To: oldrisky44
I'm assuming your drawing from the losers of the games involved? I wouldn't make it more complicated then it is. It's a 6 man game and should remain such.
Sergeant 1st Class Preditor
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:07 pm
Location: USA
* Private message
From: Preditor
To: oldrisky44
I'm assuming your drawing from the losers of the games involved? I wouldn't make it more complicated then it is. It's a 6 man game and should remain such.
Sergeant 1st Class Preditor
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:07 pm
Location: USA
* Private message
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:38 pm
5 man games
The tournament rules state:
"The winner of each game will advance to the next round, and the losers go home."
Losers go home seems straightforward. If a game winner drops out, why should the rest of the winners be at risk to lose the tournament to a player who lost the first round?
The tournament rules state:
"The winner of each game will advance to the next round, and the losers go home."
Losers go home seems straightforward. If a game winner drops out, why should the rest of the winners be at risk to lose the tournament to a player who lost the first round?
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:49 pm
Vote Tally
1. Two 5 man games = 11
2. Random draw = 7
1. Two 5 man games = 11
2. Random draw = 7
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:09 pm
2 x 5's
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:57 pm
I vote for the 5-man games.
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:50 pm
longboreder wrote:5 man games
The tournament rules state:
"The winner of each game will advance to the next round, and the losers go home."
Losers go home seems straightforward. If a game winner drops out, why should the rest of the winners be at risk to lose the tournament to a player who lost the first round?
very good point!
Re: [FULL] Society of Cooks Standard Invitational Tournament
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 8:32 pm
Preditor wrote:longboreder wrote:5 man games
The tournament rules state:
"The winner of each game will advance to the next round, and the losers go home."
Losers go home seems straightforward. If a game winner drops out, why should the rest of the winners be at risk to lose the tournament to a player who lost the first round?
very good point!
on the other hand,not knowing the reasons why the 2 players dropped out,why should a "6" player game be reduced to 5,it's not fair on the other players in the tournament.
i do like playiing devils advocate