Conquer Club

Symmetry wrote:Some morons are always gonna expect that dice don't roll ones twice in a row for them.

BrutalBob wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Some morons are always gonna expect that dice don't roll ones twice in a row for them.

And this trolly shit has been going on for years and we are all sick of it

KoolBak wrote::lol: that there is funny.

Yo Bobby. The bad dice hurt, yet we ignore the offsetting good dice. I do it too. All of our long term dice stats are the same. Go kill a kangaroo and you'll feel bettah.

And quit antagonizing brother Sym...thats not healthy.

Evil Semp wrote:

KoolBak wrote::lol: that there is funny.

Yo Bobby. The bad dice hurt, yet we ignore the offsetting good dice. I do it too. All of our long term dice stats are the same. Go kill a kangaroo and you'll feel bettah.

And quit antagonizing brother Sym...thats not healthy.

I am sure you will be hearing from the Australian chapter of PETA for that comment.

So true about ignoring the good dice KB. One thing about the dice that you don't see is your defensive dice. You don't get to see the times you were attacked and your 2 defeated a 12.

“Games produce a ‘winner’ paradox. In real life you don’t always win. Only one football team gets to win the Super Bowl each year, all the others lose. In games, you always win. I never get complaint letters from fans and gamers saying, ‘I win too much.’ This is fundamental to entertainment; the player is looking for a satisfactory conclusion.”

“There is a basic dichotomy in games: When you reward players for winning a war and give them 100 gold pieces, the player never really questions rewards. If something bad happens, if there is a setback to the player, they react much differently. They complain the game is broken, the AI is cheating, or something in the game is wrong. You have to be careful with setbacks. It’s important to explain why these things happen, and how to avoid these things in the future. If gamers believe the game is cheating, if you haven’t explained something well, they will leave. I see a big value is replayability. Whenever there is an opportunity to plant the seed of replayability, you’re on your way to a satisfied customer.”

(...)

“Player psychology has nothing to do with rational thought. My background is in mathematics. In CIV REV (Civilization Revolution, the console-only Civilization game), we found interesting reactions to what seemed to me vary rational situations. For instance when we pit civilized militia against uncivilized barbarians, and their points were 1.5 to 0.5, respectively, we heard players complain. Even when players were in a battle with 1: 3 odds, they felt they could win. I watched these testers and players, and they would say, “I had the lower number, and I felt I could win in a 1:3 battle. It made sense to the player that they could win. I thought, “Something is going on there. But it’s not mathematics.” Right around 3:1 to 4:1 area, the player felt like he or she should have the chance to win.”

Evil Semp wrote:

KoolBak wrote::lol: that there is funny.

Yo Bobby. The bad dice hurt, yet we ignore the offsetting good dice. I do it too. All of our long term dice stats are the same. Go kill a kangaroo and you'll feel bettah.

And quit antagonizing brother Sym...thats not healthy.

I am sure you will be hearing from the Australian chapter of PETA for that comment.

So true about ignoring the good dice KB. One thing about the dice that you don't see is your defensive dice. You don't get to see the times you were attacked and your 2 defeated a 12.

Evil Semp wrote:

KoolBak wrote::lol: that there is funny.

Yo Bobby. The bad dice hurt, yet we ignore the offsetting good dice. I do it too. All of our long term dice stats are the same. Go kill a kangaroo and you'll feel bettah.

And quit antagonizing brother Sym...thats not healthy.

I am sure you will be hearing from the Australian chapter of PETA for that comment.

So true about ignoring the good dice KB. One thing about the dice that you don't see is your defensive dice. You don't get to see the times you were attacked and your 2 defeated a 12.

Bernie Sanders wrote:We need a crying/whining forum. This thread is so distressing that I'm having difficulty finishing my delicious frosty tropical drink at the pool.

I'd rather avoid all this baby poo-poo.

Forum for posters who are dissatisfied with life as we know it.

Ok, back to my cocktail.....carry on peasants.

HitRed wrote:

Bernie Sanders wrote:We need a crying/whining forum. This thread is so distressing that I'm having difficulty finishing my delicious frosty tropical drink at the pool.

I'd rather avoid all this baby poo-poo.

Forum for posters who are dissatisfied with life as we know it.

Ok, back to my cocktail.....carry on peasants.

Bernie, the pool is for paying guess only, GET BACK TO WORK!

Bernie Sanders wrote:We need a crying/whining forum. This thread is so distressing that I'm having difficulty finishing my delicious frosty tropical drink at the pool.

I'd rather avoid all this baby poo-poo.

Forum for posters who are dissatisfied with life as we know it.

Ok, back to my cocktail.....carry on peasants.

BrutalBob wrote:

Bernie Sanders wrote:We need a crying/whining forum. This thread is so distressing that I'm having difficulty finishing my delicious frosty tropical drink at the pool.

I'd rather avoid all this baby poo-poo.

Forum for posters who are dissatisfied with life as we know it.

Ok, back to my cocktail.....carry on peasants.

We have a crying whining forum- this is it.

I suppose your the sort of guy that walks around the pub complaining about the alcoholics and drunk people.