****THE OFFICIAL WARLORDS OF WORT CALLOUT****

sirbrezalot · Post by **sirbrezalot** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:23 am

reverend_kyle wrote:Great, I'll take a fat tire.

You'll need several fat tire's to wash down the bitter taste of defeat. Prepare to lose to a bunch of drunks.

joe snuffy · Post by **joe snuffy** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:27 am

reverend_kyle wrote:
Backglass wrote:My brews are on Oblomov. I still ache from his silent-but-deadly ass kickin'.

And to guarantee a W.O.W. win...I wont be playing!

But I will provide the beer...

Great, I'll take a fat tire.

Bah! Fat Tire is just swill compared to the brews we produce.

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:23 am

Fat tire?

You obviously have no shame.

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:44 pm

Ok, I propose 9, Triples games played 2 at a time.

All games will be Sequential/Unlimited.

Each clan will pick a map for each pair of games.

Each winner will be awarded two points per player.

First out will only get one point.

The final game will be decided by the points leader and will be worth 5 points.

Thoughts?

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:54 pm

I'd like some parity between players in each game in terms of rank, as well as some scheme to prevent the same players from playing every game. Having the top three players from each clan play every game would be boring. Watching three colonels whip three privates sounds boring too.

Any suggestions on how to accomplish this?

Bierboy · Post by **Bierboy** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:16 pm

I'm in Scott.

Lt. Scheisskopf

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:30 pm

How games are designated as to be played by people rank X and below. For example, game 1 is captains and below, game 2 is majors and below, game 3 is anyone, etc.

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:02 pm

Agreed, I'm more for mixing the ranks however.

How about we post the players first and there can only be one player per pair of games from each clan. Also no team can be greater than Colonel, Major, Captain per team?

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:19 pm

D.IsleRealBrown wrote:How about we post the players first and there can only be one player per pair of games from each clan.

Agreed.

Also no team can be greater than Colonel, Major, Captain per team?

I'd prefer of each pair of games, one is Colonel/Major/Captain, and the other is Major/Captain/Lt. Acceptable?

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:22 pm

I'd like to....but I have quite a few Colonels that want to play, I haven't discussed this with anyone else yet, let me get back to you.

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:41 pm

I've got a TON of privates, SGTs, and LTs that want to play. And they're probably all going to be drunk.

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:04 pm

How about you guys just promise to drink 2 beers for every 1 of ours? Or are you not old enough to drink yet?

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:06 pm

Son, I could drink you under the table twice over.

joe snuffy · Post by **joe snuffy** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:37 pm

D.IsleRealBrown wrote:Son, I could drink you under the table twice over.

I doubt that you could in beer. We brew/drink high gravity stuff that is much stronger as well as tastier than that "water" Bud/ Coors/ Natural Light that you kids drink.

Now when it comes to the hard stuff, I'll concede to you on that. But when it comes to brews you boys would not have a chance.

sirbrezalot · Post by **sirbrezalot** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:42 pm

ScottS wrote:And they're probably all going to be drunk.

Stop sharing our strategy!

I think they are going to end up with higher ranking players than ours, but if we have matchups like their Lieutenant-Captain-Major vs our Sergeant-Lieutenant-Captain I don't think its a problem.

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:44 pm

Riiiight, I currently have a case of Polaner Octoberfest in the fridge.

Last night I started off with a Sam Adams lager and a double shot of Jameson's Irish Whiskey. I proceded to drink 5 more Sams and 3 shots of 1800. I also bowled a 289.

So you believe what you want.

I respect the home-brewing though.

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:20 pm

D.IsleRealBrown wrote:Son, I could drink you under the table twice over.

Yeah. Good luck with that.

Beer is for pansies. I make and drink mead. A LOT of it.

Apologies to fellow WoWers, of course.

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:26 pm

A 289?

Dude! You missed!

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:32 pm

Don't get me started...fucking perfect ball too.

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:25 pm

ScottS wrote:Beer is for pansies. I make and drink mead. A LOT of it.

Whatever you say...honey. :lol:

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:29 pm

Ort ort ort.

Get back in your hole, drunkie.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:11 am

Ok, every territory taken, you drink.

Every player eliminated you swig.

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:19 pm

Our first two teams....

Team 1:

D.Isle
MasterBush
JTFR

Team 2:

Bogusbet
b-b5
2dimes

You can look up the ranks via our usergroup.

ScottS · Post by **ScottS** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:56 pm

Give me a bit to get everyone together.

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:02 pm

Bump.