[Abandoned] - Mexican-American War

Abandoned and Vacationed maps. The final resting place, unless you recycle.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Gemineye
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am

Post by Gemineye »

well, i had already done most of the xml prior to the cross trick, so i figured i would post this so you guys could tell me which ones to focus on.

Image
Image

I hate truces, and I hate people that truce. If you can't win on your own, DON'T PLAY!
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Post by cairnswk »

cairnswk wrote:*The water looks interesting!


good or bad, interesting?


OK...here it is, i didn't want to say it all in one go in case I offended...my first impression was that somone had run a scourer across a piece of metal....I'm still not sure on it.


well, first, the railhead is actually in Mississippi. second, yes, that is right...one railway can attack another, but only one station up the track.
i.e. Montanas -> Disputed North and Montanas -> Iowa Territory, but Montanas cannot attack Mexico City or Mississippi.


So it is in Mississippi...sorry bout that....i think I like the "x is a railroad, and attack other railroads, but only in the path shown" story. I understood that better.

Gemineye wrote:
cairnswk wrote:Gemineye....good job on those mountains.
*Can you attack from Montanas to Lago Grande or are the mountains going to be used as unpassable barriers?


unpassable barriers--with the exception of the railway.


Perhaps, if i could suggest to open up the mountains just around the rail line so that it is clear you can attack across those broders.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

So any X can attack any X?
Image
User avatar
Skittles!
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am
Gender: Male

Post by Skittles! »

Gilligan wrote:So any X can attack any X?


Yes, it's a railway. Joining countries together meaning they can attack each other.
I think it's like that, kind of like a water connection or an airport.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
boberz
Posts: 864
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:21 pm

Post by boberz »

the legend needs loads of work it is out of place
User avatar
johloh
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Post by johloh »

here are some suggestions...

-the english on the railroad station legend needs to be re-written. something like 'is a railroad station, can also attack any connected station' you make it sounds like they can only attack other railroads...
-ocean needs a less metal like texture
-legend seems a little to removed from the map, maybe try to blend it in a little more? remove the bevel? something...
-'unorganized' is certainly not the best name for an area dominated by native americans. they were definetly organized...
-should it be sierra nevada, instead of serra nevada?
-im not a big fan of the squiggly arrows for attacks over rivers...maybe put some bridges on them?
my new site - http://www.spritestitch.com/ - A video game craft weblog...
User avatar
Sgt. Grumbles
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:56 pm

Post by Sgt. Grumbles »

i think that Mexico is too big to only get 6 armies... but thats just me
User avatar
nagerous
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am
Gender: Male

Post by nagerous »

really? I thought mexico should be possibly 5, its right in the left hand corner not in the middle of the map so its excluded from the rest of the map and the fighting grounds nearer texas
Gemineye
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am

Post by Gemineye »

Skittles! wrote:
Gilligan wrote:So any X can attack any X?


Yes, it's a railway. Joining countries together meaning they can attack each other.
I think it's like that, kind of like a water connection or an airport.


no.....

ive put this example in a few times now, but Montanas can attack all countries it touches, just like normal, but the railway allows it to attack either Iowa Territory or Disputed South, but because it is not directly connected to mississippi or Mexico City, it CANNOT attack those.

johloh wrote:-the english on the railroad station legend needs to be re-written. something like 'is a railroad station, can also attack any connected station' you make it sounds like they can only attack other railroads...


well, i want to make it clear that the railroads only attack a connected railroad...who wouldnt understand that they also attack adjacent territories?

johloh wrote:-'unorganized' is certainly not the best name for an area dominated by native americans. they were definetly organized...


every map that you will find of the N.American continent during the mid 1800's, when this territory existed, states that this is 'unorganized' territory. the only reason i added any territories in that region is because i was asked to. there were just not enough territories on the map. if you guys think this is an inappropriate name, even though it is accurate, please suggest something else.

johloh wrote:-should it be sierra nevada, instead of serra nevada?


no, it was Serra Nevada at the time, from the maps i found.

johloh wrote:-im not a big fan of the squiggly arrows for attacks over rivers...maybe put some bridges on them?


well, if this is a mass opinion, i can do it, but i find bridges are just so boring. i will run a poll on it soon.



as far as Mexico and the number of bonus....it only has 4 borders, hence i dont think there should be MORE bonus, but it does have a lot of territories, which is why i think 6 is perfect. all thoughts/ideas will be considered.


thank you all for feedback, please continue.
Image

I hate truces, and I hate people that truce. If you can't win on your own, DON'T PLAY!
User avatar
hereje888
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:57 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Uranus

Post by hereje888 »

I don't really like the railroad system, to be honest. Now lemme ask something. The rivers in "New" mexico are unpassable borders :?: :?: Because I think that the mountains are enough.

Otherwise, Excellent work 8)
my favorite map: AUSTRALIA
my least favorite map: CARIBBEAN ISLANDS
Gemineye
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am

Post by Gemineye »

well, about the railroads.....


not to be mean, but i really dont understand what the confusion is. its simply a linear attack system:

X<--->Y<--->Z<--->A<--->B

X can attack Y, Y can attack X or Z, Z can attack Y or A, A can attack Z or B, B can attack A. a railroad can attack through the railway, but only a connected station--meaning it cant "skip" a station. in following w/ this example, Y cannot attack A, because it does not directly connect.


hereje888 wrote:The rivers in "New" mexico are unpassable borders--Because I think that the mountains are enough.


you know, i think you are probably right here, for the big river that cuts through new mexico, it needs to be passable in all areas. the main reason for it is to keep w/ the accurate cosmetic appearance.
Image

I hate truces, and I hate people that truce. If you can't win on your own, DON'T PLAY!
User avatar
Samus
Posts: 372
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:33 pm

Post by Samus »

The railroad tracks need to be railroad tracks, not dots, and the stations need to be stations. You need to change the wording to read "Each railroad station can attack the next railroad station in either direction on the tracks."

You need to consolidate all the rivers east of Texas into one river that runs along that entire east Texas border. If you feel you still need more divisions in S. and N. United States, use mountains.

Eliminate the river between Disputed South and San Antonio, it divides nothing (not even those two territories).

Eliminate the entire river that runs between Montana and New Mexico (and other areas), it divides very little and that portion of the map is too isolated as is.

Shorten the river between New Mexico and Disputed North so that it stops just above the Disputed North-Disputed South border.

Move the text for "Los Angeles" over to the ocean side so that we can see what's going on with the borders there.
Gemineye
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am

Post by Gemineye »

so, i guess what you are saying Samus, is that it isnt that important to be geographically accurate?

im happy to make all these changes, as long as we understand that most of them require the accuracy to decline.
Image

I hate truces, and I hate people that truce. If you can't win on your own, DON'T PLAY!
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Post by Gilligan »

Why won't Andy post here?
Image
User avatar
nagerous
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am
Gender: Male

Post by nagerous »

keep it geographically accurate in regards to rivers + mountains if u can
Spritzking
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:19 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Spritzking »

maybe you could add a line around the map. i don't like way it ends in the east...

further things: dont make to many teritories...
Gemineye
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am

Post by Gemineye »

Gilligan wrote:Why won't Andy post here?


maybe Andy don't like it :(
Image

I hate truces, and I hate people that truce. If you can't win on your own, DON'T PLAY!
Spritzking
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:19 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Spritzking »

is andy the biggest treath for every mapmaker?
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Post by hulmey »

instead of dots for the railroad..Why dont you make a proper looking railroad..It would be much nicer!!!!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Post by Qwert »

yea, you can put real railroad track in map.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

I watch topics a while before I post. The Foundry Process is at hand. :)


--Andy
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Post by Qwert »

I dont understand vote question, its these map finish for play?
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
Gemineye
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am

Post by Gemineye »

i will be glad to make the minor changes that have been set out, but to be quite honest, i am very much a novice w/ Photoshop. i am really unsure how to make good looking railroad tracks. i have tried a few things, but they look like crap. if anyone can give me a few pointers on how i could, it would be appreciated.

otherwise, i am working on the updates.
Image

I hate truces, and I hate people that truce. If you can't win on your own, DON'T PLAY!
User avatar
boberz
Posts: 864
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:21 pm

Post by boberz »

qwert wrote:I dont understand vote question, its these map finish for play?


he is getting ahead which is a good thing and trying to see if it is worth doing the xml now which will save the tedious co-ordinate debates later however i still think there are a few tweaks like the railroads to be made
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Post by hulmey »

There must be a site somewhere that you can download stuff etc....

Mibi must know but i think he will want to keep it secret :)

I mean where does he get the images for the trees and paving of the castle!!!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
Post Reply

Return to “Recycling Box”