Conquer Club

Now we know why he wanted the name change. Was it his name, or his fathers...DUM DUM DUM................lol

I have a screen shot of GLG saying that the screen shot you took eddie2 was "disinformation". I don't know what he means by that, but this shows his credibility...if he fed "disinformation" to us then feeding it to the admins early on about his sons account isn't a stretch.

All of these game chat examples PROVE NOTHING!

I could say that I am your dad in game chat... would it make it so?

here ill do it...

Game 10611858

2012-02-22 18:37:21 - demonfork: Hey everyone... I'm not really demonfork...I'm really demonforks dad


Does this statement that I just made prove that I am really someones dad?

Maybe I'm your dad... Ive banged a lot of hoes...its quite possible that one of em was your mom and that you are really my son...it's possible.

demonfork wrote:All of these game chat examples PROVE NOTHING!

I could say that I am your dad in game chat... would it make it so?

here ill do it...

Game 10611858

2012-02-22 18:37:21 - demonfork: Hey everyone... I'm not really demonfork...I'm really demonforks dad


Does this statement that I just made prove that I am really someones dad?

Maybe I'm your dad... Ive banged a lot of hoes...its quite possible that one of em was your mom and that you are really my son...it's possible.

This wouldn't pass as a defense for the majority of C&A reports, it doesn't pass now. Just saying "it ain't so" doesn't give counter evidence. The argument for the defense apparently rested with the plea.

Well yes you can say that but where there are multiple accounts involved if im the son one day and the father the next on the same account there is an issue.

There were quite a few people involved on the "disinformation" from day 1 of the GLG account for it all to be made up.

Or, this was the greatest and longest-developing ploy in the history of CC.

Oh I agree 100%, I just think that making statements about "disinformation" after what was he posted in live chat as his " son" is him trying to cover his butt.

demonfork wrote:Maybe I'm your dad... Ive banged a lot of hoes...its quite possible that one of em was your mom and that you are really my son...it's possible.

nice flame...but to imply that my mother is a whore crosses the line and your post has been reported...I can only concluded that this is a petty attempt at Baiting me into some similar response in the hope of having the thread locked...

everyone is entitled to there opinion in a C&A case and I am well aware that there are a number of GLG fan-boys that will never see anything wrong no matter how much light you shine on it....equally there are many GLG die hard "detractor's" that will jump all over this, this is just the nature of this site but this case has merit otherwise I would never have brought this to the public forum...thanks for your input...

while I'm here I might as well respond quickly to some of the posts...

jefjef wrote:FLAWS:

As much "drama" that has been associated with GLG and his former account a lot of hunters/admins eyes and hands have been on it. Why was he never busted for multi??

A) They never ever ever bothered checking him for multi.
B) He is and they are protecting him.
C) It is a house account.
D) He isn't a multi.

You may have stumbled upon some more sketchy games - possible S/D - probable favoritism and maybe a few game account share.

I do wish you lots of Good luck with your vendettas.

Please read all the OP before commenting....it is obvious that the GLG and bearcat account were two separate accounts when set-up and were operated separately for sometime...maybe a year maybe longer...during GLG's many C&A cases bearcat was absent from the site so I dont see any reason why the MH's would have looked into him or looked for any connection between them...what this case is trying to determine is at some point it looks like one of two things happened...

1)they are sharing the same account which is against the rules..
2)bearcat took over the Gen.Lee account at some stage from his Dad and would make the Gen.Lee account a Multi seen as bearcat joined the site 10 days before Gen.Lee, which is against the rules...

NoSurvivors wrote:I choose... hmmm.... D as the obvious answer here. Why wont people just give up? The man doesnt break any rules (worth punishment, as he is quite the joker in Live Chat ) but people can't help but try to find obscure ways to bust him for stuff he doesnt do!My advice to you sir, give er a rest.. please.. dont waste your time on BS threads like this one. If he was He'd be busted by now and YOU KNOW IT.

again read the response to jefjef's post...also I see your point about him been a funny guy...maybe we should just forget about the whole case I would hate to deprive live chat of there Joker...

karel wrote::roll: again...who cares

i know there have been many GLG C&A reports (probably more then anyone else on the site) and Im sure they all kind of blend together but I assure you this information has never been presented before...so its not the same old thing again...

i suspect that they will just change the current conquerors names to bearcat....which is a lot like barecat...should i grab the thesaurus one more time and look up other words for cat?

sorry guys, i cannot stand up right now -- in the middle of gettin hed.

Amazingly, I can say almost ANYTHING to one of The Inner Circle's minions and get THEM to post in Forums so I don't have to. Now don't YOU feel manipulated???

Disinformation: spewing BS to distract opponent. Look at the 3 scams listed on my Profile. People getting too personal about my life. I am entitled to privacy, so instead of answering probing questions I deflect them --as is my right.

What should NOT be in question is whether I play ethically and legally. I play within the rules.

Who was the brain that wondered if the lower scoring person in question took over the higher scoring player? that's sheer stupidity. You guys think like elementary school children. The accumulated intelligence of your band of merry men could fill a gnat's dimple. You look at an Ace of Spades from your angle and are SURE it's solid. . but like your "eveidence" it's paper thin.

Questions have been asked before by multi-hunters and they have been answered. Today I clarified several things proactively to that same group and CC admin. No problem in the past, just someone with (what did they call it?. . .) a vendetta -- because within the rules I asked them to POLITELY stop baiting/flaming/trolling forums about my ID.

My cut at this is: old school inner circle does NOT like:
-someone playing within the rules having the high score
-thick headed players thinking that high score is all about How Great of a Viking/home run hitter you are. it's not, it's about "getting on base or score" and I know how legally take a walk, get hit by a pitch, and beat the throw to first when the catcher drops the ball. I also know how to steal second, third and score on a sacrifice. Not pretty, but totally legal.
-someone standing up to the 20-40 hugely negative people on Forums and calling them out for what they are. Using the baiting/flaming/trolling rules to quiet them.. .nicely.
-one of the nicest clans with some of the best players obtaining a tarnished but capable resource -- and crying about it. Shit, one of the detractor's clans leaders approached me to join them --now a clansman complains?
-shows how totally immature those 20-40 people can be.

Well you've met your match in me. I can be MORE immature than you can. Nanny-nanny-boo-boo I got more points than you do. (.(

oh, and the noise you hear in the dark. . .is ME -- the Boogey Man

Your ID is what is being questioned here, not your "legitimate" playing. Your post clarified nothing btw. And a gnats dimple?

sorry guys, i cannot stand up right now -- in the middle of gettin hed.

Amazingly, I can say almost ANYTHING to one of The Inner Circle's minions and get THEM to post in Forums so I don't have to waste my time. Now don't YOU feel used/manipulated???

Disinformation: spewing BS to distract opponent. Look at the 3 scams listed on my Profile -- they are 100% true. People getting too personal about my life. I am entitled to privacy, so instead of answering probing questions I deflect them --as is my right.

What should NOT be in question is whether I play ethically and legally. I play within the rules.

Who was the brain that wondered if the lower scoring person in question took over the higher scoring players ID? that's sheer stupidity. You guys think like elementary school children. The accumulated intelligence of your band of merry men could fill a gnat's dimple. You look at an Ace of Spades from your angle and are SURE it's solid. . but like your "eveidence" it's paper thin.

Questions have been asked before by multi-hunters and they have been answered. Today I clarified several things proactively to that same group and CC admin. No problem in the past, just someone with (what did they call it?. . .) a vendetta -- because within the rules I asked them to POLITELY stop baiting/flaming/trolling forums about my ID.

My cut at this is: old school inner circle does NOT like:
-someone playing within the rules having the high score
-thick headed players thinking that high score is all about How Great of a Viking/home run hitter you are. it's not, it's about "getting on base or score" and I know how legally take a walk, get hit by a pitch, and beat the throw to first when the catcher drops the ball. I also know how to steal second, third and score on a sacrifice. Not pretty, but totally legal. Now you don't graduate from the 8th grade until you can remember that.
-someone standing up to the 20-40 hugely negative people on Forums and calling them out for what they are. Using the baiting/flaming/trolling rules to quiet them.. .nicely.
-one of the nicest clans with some of the best players obtaining a tarnished but capable resource -- and crying about it. Shit, one of the detractor's clans leaders approached me to join them --now that a member of that clan complains? Sorry, sounds like sour grapes.
-shows how totally immature those 20-40 people can be.

Well you 20-40 and your minions have met your match in me. I can be MORE immature than you can: Nanny-nanny-boo-boo I got more points than you do. (.(

oh, and the noise you hear in the dark. . .is ME -- the Boogey Man

Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:sorry guys, i cannot stand up right now -- in the middle of gettin hed.

Amazingly, I can say almost ANYTHING to one of The Inner Circle's minions and get THEM to post in Forums so I don't have to. Now don't YOU feel manipulated???

Disinformation: spewing BS to distract opponent. Look at the 3 scams listed on my Profile. People getting too personal about my life. I am entitled to privacy, so instead of answering probing questions I deflect them --as is my right.

What should NOT be in question is whether I play ethically and legally. I play within the rules.

Who was the brain that wondered if the lower scoring person in question took over the higher scoring player? that's sheer stupidity. You guys think like elementary school children. The accumulated intelligence of your band of merry men could fill a gnat's dimple. You look at an Ace of Spades from your angle and are SURE it's solid. . but like your "eveidence" it's paper thin.

Questions have been asked before by multi-hunters and they have been answered. Today I clarified several things proactively to that same group and CC admin. No problem in the past, just someone with (what did they call it?. . .) a vendetta -- because within the rules I asked them to POLITELY stop baiting/flaming/trolling forums about my ID.

My cut at this is: old school inner circle does NOT like:
-someone playing within the rules having the high score
-thick headed players thinking that high score is all about How Great of a Viking/home run hitter you are. it's not, it's about "getting on base or score" and I know how legally take a walk, get hit by a pitch, and beat the throw to first when the catcher drops the ball. I also know how to steal second, third and score on a sacrifice. Not pretty, but totally legal.
-someone standing up to the 20-40 hugely negative people on Forums and calling them out for what they are. Using the baiting/flaming/trolling rules to quiet them.. .nicely.
-one of the nicest clans with some of the best players obtaining a tarnished but capable resource -- and crying about it. Shit, one of the detractor's clans leaders approached me to join them --now a clansman complains?
-shows how totally immature those 20-40 people can be.

Well you've met your match in me. I can be MORE immature than you can. Nanny-nanny-boo-boo I got more points than you do. (.(

oh, and the noise you hear in the dark. . .is ME -- the Boogey Man

Well if this case gets thrown out can we all at least all agree this guy is the most annoying conqueror to date? I think admin should take their time with this and get it right, innocent or guilty either way.

We should get the tar and feathers ready either way

TheGeneral2112 wrote:Irish, I was wondering when we would see this. Congratulations. Can we have a medal for being the one to take down a standing conqueror?

it's happened before... Blitz was sitting right on top and was banned for a month and fell from the top (now he is back to his same old tricks, sans the multi account and it is all within the rule. joining a slew of games by a premium private with a thug squad of mercenaries is still not farming).

Symmetry wrote:Probably the most thorough accumulation of evidence I've ever seen for a C&A thread. Pretty damning in almost every aspect- it should be expected that the mods will take a bit of time to look over this though. That's a hell of a lot of evidence to look through. While it should be true that all complaints be treated equally, this is high profile stuff and I can understand that they would want to get this right.

the people in the blitz CASES did a great job. this is also amazing, but that report had a ton of game uncovered that mods had not found or taken into account...-el Jesus negro

PLEASE EVERYONE! Let the "eveidence" speek fo itzelf!

jefjef wrote:PLEASE EVERYONE! Let the "eveidence" speek fo itzelf!

I noticed that and thought he was flaming the original post guess not, maybe his son did take over

Just let the investigators do their job...... This is why they are here. There is no point arguing over this.

just sounds like another witch hunt

karel wrote:just sounds like another witch hunt

that is absolutely HILARIOUS!!! didn't bother to read the first post at all, did you? ha!!!!-el Jesus negro

owenshooter wrote:

karel wrote:just sounds like another witch hunt

that is absolutely HILARIOUS!!! didn't bother to read the first post at all, did you? ha!!!!-el Jesus negro

Obv he didn't.

The evidence seems plausible to me. Even though I wasn't here on CC when all this really started.

Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Who was the brain that wondered if the lower scoring person in question took over the higher scoring player? that's sheer stupidity. You guys think like elementary school children. The accumulated intelligence of your band of merry men could fill a gnat's dimple.

What I cannot understand sir, is how you can bring a case to the mods that concerned community members in good standing are baiting and flaming you in the forums when you are so quick to do the same?

Some pretty interesting evidence was served up my the OP. A lot of work and research done to uncover some fairly suspicious activities. I have every faith in the mods that a solid investigation will take place. For all of you that harbor doubt in our current conquerors ability to be investigated without prejudice, keep in mind that the so called "witch hunt" that occurred after Blitaholic was accused & reported for rules abuse ended up in his fall from grace and a perpetual * by his name in every ones mind that respects fair play and good conduct.

We shall all wait and see what the powers that be uncover and clarify in the days to come. Personally I feel it would be a shame for another conqueror to be removed by site management, for as credible justice is the failure to block the quick exploitative road to the top seems to bring the worst out in those that get there.

Johnny Rockets

IR1SH ACE wrote:

demonfork wrote:Maybe I'm your dad... Ive banged a lot of hoes...its quite possible that one of em was your mom and that you are really my son...it's possible.

nice flame...but to imply that my mother is a whore crosses the line and your post has been reported...I can only concluded that this is a petty attempt at Baiting me into some similar response in the hope of having the thread locked...

Not so much a flame but I'm not surprised that you would see it that way....I mean you have somehow fabricated this conspiracy theory of yours to the point to where you actually think that you have "proof" of this outlandish claim when in actuality you have absolutely nothing.

This is an internet gaming site made up of pixels being generated from anonymous people sitting behind their keyboards. For all anyone knows GLG is a middle aged fat chick from Alabama that lives in a trailer and has 5 kids but somehow you have diluted yourself into thinking that you know who and what GLG really is based on some shit that was written in game chat...because everyone knows that what people say on the internet is always 100% true.

I was hoping that you had the ability to read between the lines and see that this is the point that I making but instead you only perceived a flame.....whateves!

If GLG gets busted for this and the bust is made based on this shit that he said in game chat and not on any kind of hard evidence then I am done spending money at this site.

demonfork wrote:
If GLG gets busted for this and the bust is made based on this shit that he said in game chat and not on any kind of hard evidence then I am done spending money at this site.

well wouldn't that be sweet