Conquer Club

how about you put an OT poster in each category andy?

Metsfanmax wrote:

nietzsche wrote:do me do me!!

Lawful Evil

According to macbone's first poster, I want to be Chaotic Neutral, also, Johnny Depp gets a lot of pussy, so that'll be me. Chaotic Evil is also very appealing but I'm not really evil.

nietzsche wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

nietzsche wrote:do me do me!!

Lawful Evil

According to macbone's first poster, I want to be Chaotic Neutral, also, Johnny Depp gets a lot of pussy, so that'll be me. Chaotic Evil is also very appealing but I'm not really evil.

I don't think anyone here is. Some are Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil, but no Chaotic Evil. Then again... there's good chances that one of the lurkers is Chaotic Evil.

BigBallinStalin wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

nietzsche wrote:do me do me!!

Lawful Evil

According to macbone's first poster, I want to be Chaotic Neutral, also, Johnny Depp gets a lot of pussy, so that'll be me. Chaotic Evil is also very appealing but I'm not really evil.

I don't think anyone here is. Some are Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil, but no Chaotic Evil. Then again... there's good chances that one of the lurkers is Chaotic Evil.

It would be interesting to see what the ratio is for Off Topic posters, in terms of all the alignments. Maybe we all lean towards one or two alignments.


--Andy

TGD, put up a poll!! We need anonymous input!

notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)

muy_thaiguy wrote:What would I be? Never played DoD before.

Neutral, perhaps or nuetral good?

PLAYER57832 wrote:

notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)

I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.

thegreekdog wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)

I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.

One small glaring issue......you practice LAW

notyou2 wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)

I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.

One small glaring issue......you practice LAW

Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.

thegreekdog wrote:

notyou2 wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)

I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.

One small glaring issue......you practice LAW

Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.

Valid argument, point conceded.

thegreekdog wrote:

notyou2 wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)

I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.

One small glaring issue......you practice LAW

Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.

Being "in conflict" with the government in a legal sense is different from actively standing up against the government's legitimacy. By defending a client in legal proceedings, you are implicitly legitimizing the government's ability to collect taxes on its citizens, even if you win a particular case that results in a particular client having less of a tax obligation. Therefore I categorize you as Neutral Good.

So where is da poll?

Metsfanmax wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

notyou2 wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)

I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.

One small glaring issue......you practice LAW

Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.

Being "in conflict" with the government in a legal sense is different from actively standing up against the government's legitimacy. By defending a client in legal proceedings, you are implicitly legitimizing the government's ability to collect taxes on its citizens, even if you win a particular case that results in a particular client having less of a tax obligation. Therefore I categorize you as Neutral Good.

DAMMIT!

AndyDufresne wrote:

muy_thaiguy wrote:What would I be? Never played DoD before.

My immediate assessment would be something close to Neutral Good, since you aren't an antagonist in the Off Topics, except when Wyoming is doing something in sports.


--Andy

Since I'm not an antogonist, does that make me a protagonist, secondary but important, secondary with some impact not all that important, or background and disposable like AOG?

Does Dungeons and Dragons have a ruler? I'd definitely be queen.

mrswdk wrote:Does Dungeons and Dragons have a ruler? I'd definitely be queen.

I think it has something close, crossdessers.

I say BBS is chaotic Neutral.

notyou2 wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)

I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.

One small glaring issue......you practice LAW

Attorneys are the ultimate neutralists. They will argue any side.

Someone needs to post a summary. Someone very very bored.

Baron Von PWN wrote:I say BBS is chaotic Neutral.

No lawful neutral. He believes in the system and is not necessarily interested in any ultimate good or bad.

AoG: sexy neutral

Army of GOD wrote:AoG: sexy neutral

AoG: Too young to play D&D. It'll give him nightmares.


--Andy

PLAYER57832 wrote:

Baron Von PWN wrote:I say BBS is chaotic Neutral.

No lawful neutral. He believes in the system and is not necessarily interested in any ultimate good or bad.

I don't think BBS believes in the current system. He consistently points out it's flaws and how a more libertarian system would be better. He also frequently makes cost benefits arguments about following the law, meaning he will only follow the law so long as it it beneficial to him. Lawful neutral follows the law because its the law, other arguments be damned.