Page 2 of 2

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (11) vs (12) RET

Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 6:38 pm
by iAmCaffeine
It was 15-13 RET last I checked. Ice what's the image?

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (11) vs (12) RET

Posted: Wed May 04, 2016 7:37 pm
by rockfist
15-13 would be "slightly ahead and not decisive" in my vernacular. 22-20 would be slightly and decisively ahead...

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (11) vs (12) RET

Posted: Thu May 05, 2016 6:56 am
by iAmCaffeine
It's too close to call. ;)

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (11) vs (12) RET

Posted: Thu May 05, 2016 8:45 am
by The_Samurai
We could speculate that RET is slightly ahead with 18-16 (based on games that seem to be going one way). which will hopefully turn into a decisive lead ;-)

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (11) vs (12) RET

Posted: Thu May 05, 2016 10:31 am
by iAmCaffeine
I don't like the sound of that speculation. :/

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (11) vs (12) RET

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 12:45 am
by The_Samurai
New speculation: RET will win 24-19 :lol:

iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't like the sound of that speculation. :/

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (14) vs (16) RET

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 9:06 am
by Arama86n
So this is where the action is!
Been walking around the rest of the forum counting tumbleweeds ;)

best of luck both clans! Nice to see a little friendly banter.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 1:18 pm
by iAmCaffeine
I have it 23-18. Ugh.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 1:55 pm
by IcePack
That'll bust some brackets...

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 10:00 am
by iAmCaffeine
Indeed. Can't say I'm remotely pleased, obviously. Some luck, some faults of our own.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 1:17 pm
by rockfist
I think I had RET, but I know I had the winner of this round losing in the next so either way I can be ok.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 2:29 pm
by The_Samurai
and some good play I'd say. Luck would go both ways.

iAmCaffeine wrote:Indeed. Can't say I'm remotely pleased, obviously. Some luck, some faults of our own.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 2:43 pm
by iAmCaffeine
The_Samurai wrote:and some good play I'd say. Luck would go both ways.

iAmCaffeine wrote:Indeed. Can't say I'm remotely pleased, obviously. Some luck, some faults of our own.

I don't think I said otherwise mate. I have respect for you and your clan, I'm just a competitive guy that doesn't take losing well. This is probably the most graceful loss I've ever been a part of hah. Of course your clan played well. I'm disappointed, but we have learned.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 1:42 am
by The_Samurai
Fully agree. Several games could have gone either way, so definitely a close match. ATN has done brilliantly over the last few months. RET is still trying to break through the top 8 or so - not an easy task - but working on it! :)

TOFU in the next round ... hmmm ... a daunting task ... maybe we should have lost against you, ATN ;-)

iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't think I said otherwise mate.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 12:19 pm
by iAmCaffeine
Yeah, good luck. Retribution have been a solid clan for a long time, I hope it continues.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 4:29 am
by Tazzy_J
Well done RET. Disappointing for us but we'll learn from some mistakes and take heart in some good battles fought... Good luck going forward.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 10:26 pm
by hopalong
say it aint sew, my little bunnions!!!

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (16) vs (16) RET

Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 5:41 am
by iAmCaffeine
hopalong wrote:say it aint sew, my little bunnions!!!

It shouldn't be, but it is.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (17) vs (22) RET :: RET Wins!

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 12:56 pm
by iAmCaffeine
Congratulations RET! High quality opposition coupled with a slightly lacklustre effort on our part, you played well. Good luck in the rest. As for schiballs, we'll be having words.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (17) vs (22) RET :: RET Wins!

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 4:43 pm
by Lindax
iAmCaffeine wrote:Congratulations RET! High quality opposition coupled with a slightly lacklustre effort on our part, you played well. Good luck in the rest. As for schiballs, we'll be having words.


Could you please update the subject of this thread with the final score and mark it "FINAL"?

Thanks,

Lx

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (18) vs (25) RET :: RET Wins! FINAL

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:09 pm
by iAmCaffeine
Done.

Re: [CC6] Rd 2: ATN (18) vs (25) RET :: RET Wins! FINAL 6/15

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:31 am
by Lindax
Privileges removed, databases updated, medals awarded, topic moved.

Lx