Conquer Club

I voted NO, as the current format works well. If it ain't broke, don't fix it!

I voted Yes

I agree with the change (as it was my suggestion). I think promotions and points earned per matchup should stay as they are. It's more fun.

yes from me... i was against the change to 20 for the prem as i liked the other format... but since playing it... i think it works and the whole league should be the same format.

Agree with the change to leagues of 20 as it was my suggestion. If it can be done without too much trouble for those doing their magic on the spreadsheets, then at the end of this season

I vote no, like the current setup. That said, if there is argument for expansion, maybe just expand the top couple of leagues? Most of the to players will stay clustered there. Smaller leagues at the lower end will make newcomers feel like there is more opportunity for progress.

I vote no, bring all leagues back to smaller format.

I voted yes as all my speciality maps are banned so prefer the 2 random, 1 each of players choice set-up

I prefer a home and away game. Its not the same feel squeezed into one matchup. - And despite being so damn handsome, I expect I will eventually take the elevator down

Edit: Oh and that was a no vote if that wasnt clear.

I'm good either way, but I voted no because I enjoy playing everyone in my league twice.

happy to go with the majority, not bothered which way

Voted yes just because the increase would make it more consistent with the Premier League.

Rest Season

voted no, don't care that much

I voted no to expanding league sizes. Keeps the prem special and no need to muck around with playoffs. Also, only having one game on your home map vs two on randoms doesn't seem right to me

I voted Yes.
I've had the honor of actually playing in the Premier League a few times and have seen the 20-team format up close. I like it better. More variance in opponents. Honestly, though, it is not a huge "yes". It is not like playing in the 10-team format is not enjoyable as well.
One other reason: In 10-team, if 2 or 3 teams take a rest season, the number of games per season can be dramatically reduced. Not so much in 20 teams/league.

If it isn't broke don't fix it. It's been this way for 22 seasons. I like playing everyone twice as well. Leave as is.

I voted YES
But it's great as it is. I'd only change the format if the vote is a clear victory for YES

I like the idea of 20 players but the format would surely be better 2 x home map/1 x random??
LOL this is very important as a lot of us win MOST of our points on our home maps and that takes loads of practice and losses on the way to get really good??
Lets face it maybe get rid of random altogether?? No one likes it and it invites to much chance lol very RISKY!!
BUT the peops behind the scenes should get the biggest say for all your amazing works- THANKS

voting yes, for change immediately, i think having bigger leagues will be fun as there are more people to play each season

voted yes start asap

Increasing the league size could slow down the signup process.

The current setup is good as it is.
Even though I think that bigger leagues can have their charm, but I don't want it to be to play fewer matches against each opponent.

I would propose leagues of 16 participants, keeping the matchups as they are.

Another option would be that as it is, each league was made up of several groups so that promotions-relegations were more dynamic.

Example wrote: For example with 1 group of 20p and 28 groups of 10p:

• Premier 20 p.
• Champions 2 groups of 10p. (Champions A and B) - total 2 groups of 10p.
• League 1 to 3 ... with 2 groups A,B each league (each group of 10p) - total 6 groups of 10p
• League 4 to 6 and L7,L8 ... with 4 groups A,B,C,D each league (each group of 10p) - - total 20 groups of 10p.

And always you can add L9 even when only need 1 group.

voted yes

No...leave as is.