Conquer Club

Posted: **Fri Sep 18, 2015 11:52 am**

Dukasaur wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
GrudgeBringer_ wrote:I have been a Major for a year, maybe 2.

stop right there... yeah, we ahve all been there... Major is not a high rank. you are not even really considered a high rank until you are a colonel... sorry, but you aren't a high rank...-Jésus noir

What I find fascinating is that he says he's been a Major for two years. How low is his game load? I usually bounce from Major to Sargeant and back again at least once a month or maybe once every second month. To keep the same rank, any rank, for two years has got to mean a really low game count.

I don't think so, when I cared about ranks I stayed major for quite some time (1-2 years probably) and had a game count that varied 10-100 games. It's more about balancing game selection / type and styles of games and opponents.

Posted: **Fri Sep 18, 2015 11:53 am**

I think it depends on the rank...major has a 500 point range, as does Colonel, and Brig. General. I can stay within a 500 point range with a fairly decent game load (10 a month or so - if I play more than that on average my rank falls anyway).

A Lt. or a Captain has a narrow 200 point range that would be difficult to stay within at that game load.

Posted: **Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:11 pm**

LOL, guys, I am a major because I am a average player that seems to win just enough to stay there!! That wasn't the point...The point of using Major IS because it is a low to mid rank...now read it again. Maybe it will make more sense

Posted: **Sat Sep 19, 2015 5:04 am**

I think major is an interesting rank because some of them are really good and some are terrible, and everything in between. And that's why CC is declining.

Posted: **Sun Sep 20, 2015 4:55 pm**

Paddy The Cat wrote:I think major is an interesting rank because some of them are really good and some are terrible, and everything in between. And that's why CC is declining.

Posted: **Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:30 am**

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:39 pm**

Dukasaur wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
GrudgeBringer_ wrote:I have been a Major for a year, maybe 2.

stop right there... yeah, we ahve all been there... Major is not a high rank. you are not even really considered a high rank until you are a colonel... sorry, but you aren't a high rank...-Jésus noir

What I find fascinating is that he says he's been a Major for two years. How low is his game load? I usually bounce from Major to Sargeant and back again at least once a month or maybe once every second month. To keep the same rank, any rank, for two years has got to mean a really low game count.

Others have already put in a similar responses, but it all depends on what games you play. When I join the tourneys with 8-12 players in each game and a free for all my rank fluctuates hugely. During periods where i only play clan games and 1v1 games my rank is very consistent... although it does slowly move up

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:42 pm**

I'd also say I'd consider mahor a pretty high rank... More importantly to the point brought up about new players getting frustrated playing higher ranks...chefs would likely see major as a very very high rank. I am highly doubtful that chefs new to the site would even find ANY open games where there are players ranked above major.

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2015 8:07 am**

mookiemcgee wrote:I'd also say I'd consider mahor a pretty high rank... More importantly to the point brought up about new players getting frustrated playing higher ranks...chefs would likely see major as a very very high rank. I am highly doubtful that chefs new to the site would even find ANY open games where there are players ranked above major.

New players are the equivalent of a Private First Class. Major is a good rank if you can maintain playing it a variety of games. If you stick to the same handful of maps and settings to keep your "high" score then you're clearly not as good as you like to think [obviously this isn't directed at you mookie]. Players ranks will fluctuate of course; mine does all the time, but then I currently have over 270 active games. I have never played for rank and in the past couple of years I've dropped to Sergeant 1st Class once, and hit a high of 2999. One day I intend to drop my count to under fifty, play for rank and see where I go.

The best players, in my opinion, maintain Colonel+ in all manner of games.

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2015 8:44 am**

iAmCaffeine wrote:The best players, in my opinion, maintain Colonel+ in all manner of games.

I agree 100% with that

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2015 10:16 am**

jmyork82 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:The best players, in my opinion, maintain Colonel+ in all manner of games.

I agree 100% with that

Although, again, this depends on the game load as well.

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2015 10:38 am**

iAmCaffeine wrote:
jmyork82 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:The best players, in my opinion, maintain Colonel+ in all manner of games.

I agree 100% with that

Although, again, this depends on the game load as well.

are you trying to be funny? there is an issue with games loading...

Subject: "There was a communication error: status code is 0"

keep up with the forum... the black jesus has cracked wise...-Jésus noir

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2015 10:47 am**

u so funni shooterboii.

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2015 11:51 am**

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:19 pm**

9875

Things are shaping up!

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:37 pm**

I played a ton of risk as a youngster. If you do that it is not that hard to win games when you first start. People think you are a noob and underestimate you.

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:24 pm**

Paddy The Cat wrote:9875

Things are shaping up!

um... where did you get this number? just yesterday:

Army of GOD wrote:7816

so, please don't tell me they cooked the books again... let me do some poking around before i go nuts about nothing... aaaaand, with a quick look we
are at 7788-Jésus noir