Conquer Club

DirtyDishSoap wrote:I prodded, he said he would post but obviously hasn't. I'll give it until the end of the week and then I'll likely just take matters into my own hands.

Aren't you doing it every morning anyway?

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

Perv

Cheers, Max. While I agree with the sentiment, I feel like you could've added something to the game, too. vote Max

Ragian wrote:Cheers, Max. While I agree with the sentiment, I feel like you could've added something to the game, too. vote Max

Sorry, I was otherwise busy. Had a lot of things on my mind these last few days. I WILL post something more substancial later

Alright, mate. Unvote

You have till I'm sobered up after tonight's Yule lunch at work

the waiting continues

I have been in the bush this week, will catch up here over the weekend. Not he bush your thinking Charle/DDS, no need for memes. Dev has spoken, peace

Catching up should take you a minute.

EW I repeat my question - because I am uncomfortable with the mechanincs of endgames and what exactly a factional kill is.

We go into tonight with 4 players - assume 3 town 1 scum.

If I kill - is it possible the kill gets redirected by scum AND scum gets its own factional kill as well - which would bring us down to 1 on 1 and mafia win?

Therefore my thiniking is it would be better to not use any kill ability and so go into next day 2 v 1 with the chance for town to lynch to victory.

@Loose, I get your worries, but I don't see any indications that there would be a redirector. However, don't kill if you don't feel like it.

We lynch Max today and if he's scum (my money says he is), we win. If not, it's between Dev and me, which is bad because you've cleared Dev, and I'm town. So, really, it has to be Max. Unless you haven't cleared Dev, of course, due to whatever tampering with your investigation.

Anyway, Max. Time's up: vote Max

Protecting yourself is always safe.

I will lynch Max closer to end of day.

Rag there's only been 1 night proper and so very little chance to see evidence of a redirector if there is one.
and I keep thinking where is the power of scum to balance out the powers we've seen from town?

Loose Canon wrote:Rag there's only been 1 night proper and so very little chance to see evidence of a redirector if there is one.
and I keep thinking where is the power of scum to balance out the powers we've seen from town?

Rag claims to be able to self-protect, so so should you.

We're going into the night with two protective powers of which 1 should protect Loose and the other should protect me.

Not that I believe we have two protective powers alive, but if Dev is scum then I am forced to believe that.

Loose Canon wrote:Rag there's only been 1 night proper and so very little chance to see evidence of a redirector if there is one.
and I keep thinking where is the power of scum to balance out the powers we've seen from town?

The extra protection is also to counter the arsonist.

OK, so....

EW: Confirmed Town
Loose: Probably Town. Nothing scummy about him so far, and his gameplay is similat to what he did in that last game where we were both Masons. BUT, this is still a Mafia game, so I'm not sure.
Dev: Everything about him screams Scum, but I can't prove it. Or I don't remember.

Now,

Rags:

Claimed last to make sure there would be no counterclaim, but made a mistake, claimed a protective role when there already were 2 protective claims. Realised his mistake and pointed it out before somebody else could.
Most likely Scum.

Vote Rags

Also; I'm pretty sure some of you, even if Town, lied about their role. Can't really put my finger on it, or I don't remember what exactly, but I remember telling myself "some things just don't add up". That makes the game more difficult to read.

Cool. I expected that vote (and also well done for throwing shade at Dev in the mix). Obviously, there are things I find slightly contradictory in your accusations: If Dev is scum (a protective role), and I'm defo scum (a protective role), do you suggest there aren't any protective roles left?

Moreover, what have your night actions been? Feels odd to leave that out.

From what I'm seeing reading back a ways I'm inclined to lean Max or Rags. Loose and EW would have to played this masterfully as scum and if so well done but I don't see it. Max I have an issue with the way he claimed his role, unnecessarily, then also claims a role where he would not be a target. Rags issue I have is claiming another protective role cause it seems a bit heavy for town to have so many. Side note I did not claim protective role like mentioned in last post I am the Tracker, can only choose an individual to track and see where he goes. Since Loose did not claim he had to use his protective shot when Rags visited him then I have to believe that his claim is likely real otherwise Loose would have known he lost it and I would have seen Rags visited him. So really only leaves Max. I was a little worried there may be yet another 3p in play but out of 10 7 town, 2 scum and 1 3p seems to make sense for the set-up.

So short version, I'm for lynching Max but I'll give the hammer honours to EW as he's already stated he'll vote close to end of day and then this game can be over

Maxleod wrote:OK, so....

EW: Confirmed Town
Loose: Probably Town. Nothing scummy about him so far, and his gameplay is similat to what he did in that last game where we were both Masons. BUT, this is still a Mafia game, so I'm not sure.
Dev: Everything about him screams Scum, but I can't prove it. Or I don't remember.

Now,

Rags:

Claimed last to make sure there would be no counterclaim, but made a mistake, claimed a protective role when there already were 2 protective claims. Realised his mistake and pointed it out before somebody else could.
Most likely Scum.

Vote Rags

Also; I'm pretty sure some of you, even if Town, lied about their role. Can't really put my finger on it, or I don't remember what exactly, but I remember telling myself "some things just don't add up". That makes the game more difficult to read.

Max has Loose as prob town and me as town.

Meaning that if he is Oracle, he wouldve targeted Dev or Rag.

I dont think if I vote this is a hammer, but like... coming up with ways to still be able to lose this if Rag/Dev is scum and they have something influencing.

I thought Loose had already voted but you are right EW, currently it's 1 max 1 Rags. I'll wait then for you two to vote but if voting now I'm voting Max

I'm voting whichever way EW is voting - I'm fully expecting it to be Max too - he's as or more likely to be Mafia as anyone else - but apart from that tactically if he's Oracle.

vote maxleod
im not impatient, my patience has just run out

Fair enough. VOTE MAX

That's a lynch!

Max - Godfather has been lynched!

So ends the game!



Here be the list of actions.

1. Vot - Arson (Immune to Cop)
2. Rags - Doctor
3. Charle - Hooker (Scum)
4. Loose - Jack
5. Fusi - Cop
6. Dev - Tracker
7. EW - Prosecutor
8. Kong - Guardian
9. Traf - Drunk town Rb
10. Max - GF ( Scum)

1. Vot primes Max
2. Rag protects EW
3. Charle RBs Loose (Fails)
4. Loose invests Dev (inno)
5. Fusi invests (inno) - Dead
6. Dev follows Fusi (Target is dead)
7. None
8. Kong Protects Vot
9. Traf read my prod but opted not to reply. Will likely replace
10. Max kills Fusi

1. Rag protects Loose. - Guilty
2. Charle prosecuted (Dead unless Dev votes Inno)
3. Loose protects self - Guilty
4. Dev follows Rag (Sees it) (No vote so far - Abstain)
5. Max kills EW (Fails because he didn't read anything. Not helping anymore.) Innocent
6. Ew Prosecutor


Thanks for playing!