Re: Dragon Age Mafia ~~~ Day 1 ~~~
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:18 pm
jrl332005 wrote:Getting a little squirrely there?
Ba-dum, Crash!
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://rzmhprwww.conquerclub.com/forum2/
http://rzmhprwww.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=123196
jrl332005 wrote:Getting a little squirrely there?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:vote age for being defensive. Obvious scum. case closed.
safariguy5 wrote:Hm, I see some players here who I haven't played mafia with before (Aage, jrl, Foxglove). Should be interesting.
Vote Foxglove
Foxglove wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Hm, I see some players here who I haven't played mafia with before (Aage, jrl, Foxglove). Should be interesting.
Vote Foxglove
Vote safariguy5 for being the first person to vote me, in my first ever mafia game!

colton24 wrote:Vote duday for wearing shades
duday53 wrote:
Well done mod.
Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
safariguy5 wrote:Man, this is why I kinda like a Night 0 for any investigative and nonkilling roles. Day 1 blind like this is hard to get a lynch because everyone is blank.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
We have to take the person in question into consideration here Squirrel. This is colton we're talking about, and scummy voting is something he's known for. It's always been easy to default vote colton when we have nothing else. I would be cautious about jumping on him so early.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
wercool wrote:VOTE COLTON okMr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
that doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?
unvote
edocsil wrote:Here they are, VOTES
Aage (1) ~~~ Naxus
Colton24 (2) ~~~ Aage, Duday53
Foxglove (1) ~~~ Safariguy5
Safariguy5 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Foxglove
Naxus (1) ~~~ Cena-rules
Jrl332005 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Colton24
I think my pattern for these Vote tallies will be one per page, keeps it simple for all of us.
safariguy5 wrote:what are you talking about wercool? Mr. Squirrel was one of the regulars back when mafia was big on this forum.
wercool wrote:that doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?
MeDeFe wrote:edocsil wrote:Here they are, VOTES
Aage (1) ~~~ Naxus
Colton24 (2) ~~~ Aage, Duday53
Foxglove (1) ~~~ Safariguy5
Safariguy5 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Foxglove
Naxus (1) ~~~ Cena-rules
Jrl332005 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Colton24
I think my pattern for these Vote tallies will be one per page, keeps it simple for all of us.
That can't be right, unless I've got some funky powers I don't know about. I also distinctly recall unvoting.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:safariguy5 wrote:what are you talking about wercool? Mr. Squirrel was one of the regulars back when mafia was big on this forum.
Actually, it used to be even bigger before I got here. I just got to see the last of the regulars fade away.wercool wrote:that doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?
I don't understand this. I might make some funny posts occasionally, but when I'm interested in a mafia I normally provide as much analysis as I can. Do you disagree?