Conquer Club

Army of GOD wrote:I think child pornography is bad. But not nearly as malevolent as torturing innocent animals. That goes beyond naked 16 year olds. To me at least.

that's because you're a horrifying inversion of human decency

Army of GOD wrote:I think child pornography is bad. But not nearly as malevolent as torturing innocent animals. That goes beyond naked 16 year olds. To me at least.

As crazy as it is to compare the two, I agree...

Army of GOD wrote:I think child pornography is bad. But not nearly as malevolent as torturing innocent animals. That goes beyond naked 16 year olds. To me at least.

What the shit? You're trolling, right?

Snorri1234 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:I think child pornography is bad. But not nearly as malevolent as torturing innocent animals. That goes beyond naked 16 year olds. To me at least.

What the shit? You're trolling, right?

No, actually. Maybe it's the fact that I'm younger (18) than most of you and don't see it as that "big of a deal" but some of the s*** that they showed on the site were just awful.

EDIT: Maybe that goes to show that I'm f***** in the head, but is that my fault?

john9blue wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:I think child pornography is bad. But not nearly as malevolent as torturing innocent animals. That goes beyond naked 16 year olds. To me at least.

As crazy as it is to compare the two, I agree...

Actually, I'm more sensitive to extreme violence too. No matter against what living specie. to say that you find worst one thing or another, doesn't put you in the position of prefer the other. It's a flawed rough and ready appreciation

Snorri1234 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:I think child pornography is bad. But not nearly as malevolent as torturing innocent animals. That goes beyond naked 16 year olds. To me at least.

What the shit? You're trolling, right?

I agree with him. I can deal with naked 15 or 16 year olds (I even have some pictures like that which were given to me [ironically, at the time the girls were older than me]) but real gore and extreme violence I can't deal with. When the girls start getting younger than that though... Then there are problems.

Yo did I turn a wrong corner and end up in an universe where naked 16 year olds are considered child pornography?

Snorri1234 wrote:Yo did I turn a wrong corner and end up in an universe where naked 16 year olds are considered child pornography?

It technically is. And you can be arrested, charged and put on a sex offenders list for having pictures of naked 17 year olds.

hecter wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:Yo did I turn a wrong corner and end up in an universe where naked 16 year olds are considered child pornography?

It technically is. And you can be arrested, charged and put on a sex offenders list for having pictures of naked 17 year olds.

Yeah but dude I had sex with 16 year olds when I was 18. 16 really isn't what I'd consider child pornography.


But that's not what is on 4chan. That shit is far more fucked up.

Snorri1234 wrote:Yeah but dude I had sex with 16 year olds when I was 18. 16 really isn't what I'd consider child pornography.

Yup, and it'd be perfectly legal (here, at least) if you did it again at 81. As long as you don't take pictures of it, that is.

Snorri1234 wrote:

hecter wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:Yo did I turn a wrong corner and end up in an universe where naked 16 year olds are considered child pornography?

It technically is. And you can be arrested, charged and put on a sex offenders list for having pictures of naked 17 year olds.

Yeah but dude I had sex with 16 year olds when I was 18. 16 really isn't what I'd consider child pornography.


But that's not what is on 4chan. That shit is far more fucked up.

Honestly, I haven't seen anything worse than girls who actually look as old as me, so I'd suppose they're at least 16.

Army of GOD wrote:I think child pornography is bad. But not nearly as malevolent as torturing innocent animals. That goes beyond naked 16 year olds. To me at least.

I consider them to be very close to the same thing, personally.

I think the difference in your perspective probably has to do with the fact that for the "naked 16 year olds" you can allow yourself to not think about what else was almost certainly going on with the child, whereas with the "torturing animals", it was right there in your face and unavoidable.

Snorri1234 wrote:Yo did I turn a wrong corner and end up in an universe where naked 16 year olds are considered child pornography?

In the United States, it certainly is. In fact, high school students who have been sent "sexting" pictures of someone under the age of 18 are starting to be prosecuted.

Did you all know that people are pushing for movies to not only have no more scenes where people are smoking cigarettes, but to remove smoking scenes from older movies?

NO CIGARETTES! GORY VIOLENCE ONLY!

Just, you know, wanted to point that out for you child porn v. cruelty to animals crew.

thegreekdog wrote:Did you all know that people are pushing for movies to not only have no more scenes where people are smoking cigarettes, but to remove smoking scenes from older movies?

Yeah...I'm pretty anti-indoor-public-smoking myself, but that's pretty inane. I've even noticed it in the Mayberry reruns on TVLand.

SultanOfSurreal wrote:

Snowgun wrote:

Falkomagno wrote:I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why

The buzz is that there are so many impressionable scriptkiddies (/b/tards) sprinkled with some seriously sketchy dudes there. Add this to the fact that they are completely anonymous, and you have this organic, viral mob that can crash almost any site or server if they collectively turn their mind to it.

In fact, this amalgamation of people is called "anonymous", like some sort of hive mind. Usually they are fractionated and bicker amongst themselves, but every once in a while they can severely effect the "real world".

when have 4chan users ever affected anything but shitty furry websites? ps prank calling people does not count as affecting anything

YouTube Porn day, not once but twice

rattius wrote:

SultanOfSurreal wrote:

Snowgun wrote:

Falkomagno wrote:I'm incorruptible, but, what is the buzz about it..I mean..child porn is a crime and has to be released to underground places, but 4chan, it's almost main stream. I'm confused why

The buzz is that there are so many impressionable scriptkiddies (/b/tards) sprinkled with some seriously sketchy dudes there. Add this to the fact that they are completely anonymous, and you have this organic, viral mob that can crash almost any site or server if they collectively turn their mind to it.

In fact, this amalgamation of people is called "anonymous", like some sort of hive mind. Usually they are fractionated and bicker amongst themselves, but every once in a while they can severely effect the "real world".

when have 4chan users ever affected anything but shitty furry websites? ps prank calling people does not count as affecting anything

YouTube Porn day, not once but twice

oh wow so they annoyed some administrators on youtube for a couple hours, holy f*ck, they're like a voltron made out of a million lex luthors who are in turn each made out of a billion very tiny lex luthors

That's pretty quality stuff right there.

Neoteny wrote:That's pretty quality stuff right there.

Yes it is. I believe that will now be my new signature.

I would take care though, quite a few times the "chans" (thats all the chans 4chan, 7chan, 420chan, 420 chan bein the more dangerous i would say and quite a few other chans) have united and done a bit of damage... from what i understand they didint like iran and were settin out to screw up some websites over there... but yes it is accurate thinking of a bunch of people with teenager mentality (that is why it seems to always be kinda funny with what they do to pplz websites) and yes annoying moderators can still do a lot as not many sites have free moderators.. not to mention making links go to viruses and shit... and there are a lot of script kids out there on the chans but there are also some real hackers as well (they are just harder to get to participate and are usually there for the porn ) but when they get movin it can still be a B!tch

Ok. I know I'm responding to people from a few months in the past, but this bump is actually for realz.

Having been there a bunch of times lately (haven't seen animal violence at all. Thank God), I have seen that a lot of them seem to pride themselves in the ability to get people to commit suicide or go on a shooting spree. It's not just hacking websites...but truly messing with people's REAL lives.

But, it's weird...because they do good too. Sometimes they'll post screen pictures of actually getting a child molester caught or stopping shootings before they happen.

At times, they are the most racist, ignorant, sick and demented people on the planet. At other times, they're the most awe-inspiring, encouraging, helpful and moral people. The demographic range of that site is unbelievable.

They are united in their relentless pursuit of lulz. Nothing more.

Army of GOD wrote: At other times, they're the most awe-inspiring, encouraging, helpful and moral people. The demographic range of that site is unbelievable.

i believe they call that "cancer"

alex951 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote: At other times, they're the most awe-inspiring, encouraging, helpful and moral people. The demographic range of that site is unbelievable.

i believe they call that "cancer"

Only the oldfags (fags as in the South Park sense, not referring to homosexuals) do. They seem to make up most of the messed up people who enjoy child porn, racism and horrid violence.