Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:25 am**

xroads wrote:Other then the fact that I outdropped him by 20 troops for 10 rounds in a row?

Come on dude, pull your head out of your ass.

Better yet, go win 10,000 games on here like I have, then come talk to me about strategy and game play.

If you are so fucking good how do you go 0-20 in one day. Pathetic.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:27 am**

because if I won on the first 4-3, that would give me another shot at another 4-3, and so on. With good dice, he would be under 12 regions before he even had a chance to play and I would be over 15.

It is strategy, everyone's is different.

Show me the official strategy guide that shows I am wrong please.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:28 am**

bobdakota wrote:
xroads wrote:OK Dumb ass.

Same theory applies. I have a 4-3 from 2 or 3 territories to make sure I take a card.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Oh, I forgot, because you are a serg and dont have a clue.

I think most players would agree that 1 7-3 battel is better odds than 4 battles 4-3. If you were concerned about a card, then you would go 2 on 2 on two not 1 on 4. Just saying.

4 stacks of 4 are better than 1 stack of 7.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:31 am**

Extreme Ways wrote:
bobdakota wrote:
xroads wrote:OK Dumb ass.

Same theory applies. I have a 4-3 from 2 or 3 territories to make sure I take a card.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Oh, I forgot, because you are a serg and dont have a clue.

I think most players would agree that 1 7-3 battel is better odds than 4 battles 4-3. If you were concerned about a card, then you would go 2 on 2 on two not 1 on 4. Just saying.

4 stacks of 4 are better than 1 stack of 7.

Dont argue with him, he knows all about CC strategy and how every drop and attack should be made in every game.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:33 am**

To elaborate on this, basically restate what xroads says but then in other words, a stack of 7 uses at least 4 troops offensively (7-4=3), possibly 5 if you roll 0-2 while your stack of 7 is a stack of 4.

4 stacks of 4 uses at minimum 4 troops offensively, just like a stack of 7, but has potential to use 8 troops offensively because you have more possibilities to roll 0-2 while you're on a 4. It simply allows you to roll more with good odds.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:53 am**

Extreme Ways wrote:To elaborate on this, basically restate what xroads says but then in other words, a stack of 7 uses at least 4 troops offensively (7-4=3), possibly 5 if you roll 0-2 while your stack of 7 is a stack of 4.

4 stacks of 4 uses at minimum 4 troops offensively, just like a stack of 7, but has potential to use 8 troops offensively because you have more possibilities to roll 0-2 while you're on a 4. It simply allows you to roll more with good odds.

It interesting that the games where he went 1-1-1-1, he never got a card the first round.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:55 am**

bobdakota wrote:
Extreme Ways wrote:To elaborate on this, basically restate what xroads says but then in other words, a stack of 7 uses at least 4 troops offensively (7-4=3), possibly 5 if you roll 0-2 while your stack of 7 is a stack of 4.

4 stacks of 4 uses at minimum 4 troops offensively, just like a stack of 7, but has potential to use 8 troops offensively because you have more possibilities to roll 0-2 while you're on a 4. It simply allows you to roll more with good odds.

It interesting that the games where he went 1-1-1-1, he never got a card the first round.

If you play 4 stacks of 4 vs 1 stack of 3, you have high chance of card. If you drop vs multiple 3's, you just reduce his troopcount by a lot which is worth as much as a card if not more.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:16 pm**

xroads wrote:OK Dumb ass.

Same theory applies. I have a 4-3 from 2 or 3 territories to make sure I take a card.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Oh, I forgot, because you are a serg and dont have a clue.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:32 pm**

bobdakota wrote:
xroads wrote:OK Dumb ass.

Same theory applies. I have a 4-3 from 2 or 3 territories to make sure I take a card.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Oh, I forgot, because you are a serg and dont have a clue.

I think most players would agree that 1 7-3 battel is better odds than 4 battles 4-3. If you were concerned about a card, then you would go 2 on 2 on two not 1 on 4. Just saying.

Possibly most players would agree with you, but an overwhelming majority of GOOD players would deploy the same way xroads did. You're going to need a lot more experience and success at this game before you can accurately critique the strategy of a much higher ranked player.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:28 pm**

Doc_Brown wrote:
bobdakota wrote:
xroads wrote:OK Dumb ass.

Same theory applies. I have a 4-3 from 2 or 3 territories to make sure I take a card.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Oh, I forgot, because you are a serg and dont have a clue.

I think most players would agree that 1 7-3 battel is better odds than 4 battles 4-3. If you were concerned about a card, then you would go 2 on 2 on two not 1 on 4. Just saying.

Possibly most players would agree with you, but an overwhelming majority of GOOD players would deploy the same way xroads did. You're going to need a lot more experience and success at this game before you can accurately critique the strategy of a much higher ranked player.

Fair enough. EW criticized him in this thread for playing 2-2 and not 3-1 or 4-0. I was going off of EW, but then later he changed his story. There are a lot of BS answers form Xroads, but I guess he will get away with it. 155% up in one day and now he is up 133% and he stopped playing 1v1 games. :-$

At the end of December he wasn't higher ranked :lol:

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:24 pm**

come on guys, this is all so unnecessary!!! this case is over, it is marked as NOTED. Xroads has learned from this and is moving forward in a new direction! ENOUGH WITH THE NEGATIVITY!!! C&A should not just be a place to cast shame on people that stumble on CC. it should also be a place where we can embrace them after their stumble and help to lift them back up and put them on the right CC road to redemption!!! please, please, please this is enough!!! let's all embrace our brother, learn from this moment and move on!!! the black jesus has spoken...-Jn

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:44 pm**

owenshooter wrote:come on guys, this is all so unnecessary!!! this case is over, it is marked as NOTED. Xroads has learned from this and is moving forward in a new direction! ENOUGH WITH THE NEGATIVITY!!! C&A should not just be a place to cast shame on people that stumble on CC. it should also be a place where we can embrace them after their stumble and help to lift them back up and put them on the right CC road to redemption!!! please, please, please this is enough!!! let's all embrace our brother, learn from this moment and move on!!! the black jesus has spoken...-Jn

You may be speaking in jest, but seriously, this is a fact. This isn't Singapore. We don't flog people for a first offense.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:07 pm**

Dukasaur wrote:
owenshooter wrote:come on guys, this is all so unnecessary!!! this case is over, it is marked as NOTED. Xroads has learned from this and is moving forward in a new direction! ENOUGH WITH THE NEGATIVITY!!! C&A should not just be a place to cast shame on people that stumble on CC. it should also be a place where we can embrace them after their stumble and help to lift them back up and put them on the right CC road to redemption!!! please, please, please this is enough!!! let's all embrace our brother, learn from this moment and move on!!! the black jesus has spoken...-Jn

You may be speaking in jest, but seriously, this is a fact. This isn't Singapore. We don't flog people for a first offense.

come on, duk... was that necessary? if you agree, say you agree!! why must you tear me down in the process? i am just doing my best to keep my little corner of the internet a great place for every member that chooses to spend time here. CC is the best gaming site online, let's stop tearing it down and lift it up on our shoulders and be proud of what we are all a part of!!-Jn

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:03 pm**

owenshooter wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
owenshooter wrote:come on guys, this is all so unnecessary!!! this case is over, it is marked as NOTED. Xroads has learned from this and is moving forward in a new direction! ENOUGH WITH THE NEGATIVITY!!! C&A should not just be a place to cast shame on people that stumble on CC. it should also be a place where we can embrace them after their stumble and help to lift them back up and put them on the right CC road to redemption!!! please, please, please this is enough!!! let's all embrace our brother, learn from this moment and move on!!! the black jesus has spoken...-Jn

You may be speaking in jest, but seriously, this is a fact. This isn't Singapore. We don't flog people for a first offense.

come on, duk... was that necessary? if you agree, say you agree!! why must you tear me down in the process? i am just doing my best to keep my little corner of the internet a great place for every member that chooses to spend time here. CC is the best gaming site online, let's stop tearing it down and lift it up on our shoulders and be proud of what we are all a part of!!-Jn

A said above

If you want to discuss this rule open a discussion in the appropriate part of the forum

This case is closed

This thread is LOCKED

Conquer Club

Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]

Re: Xroads [ka]