ROUND 2:Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
ROUND 2:Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
I nominate BTU.
Last edited by DoomYoshi on Wed May 15, 2013 10:40 am, edited 3 times in total.
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
- AndyDufresne
- Posts: 24935
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
- Contact:
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
"Banana equivalent dose"
--Andy
A banana equivalent dose (abbreviated BED) is a nonstandard unit of radiation exposure, defined as the additional dose a person will absorb from eating one banana.
The concept is based on the fact that bananas, like most organic material, naturally contain a certain amount of radioactive isotopes—even in the absence of any contamination due to human nuclear endeavors. The banana equivalent dose was meant to express the severity of exposure to radiation, such as resulting from nuclear power, nuclear weapons or medical procedures, in terms that would make sense to most people.
--Andy
- Metsfanmax
- Posts: 6722
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Woodruff wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?
The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Metsfanmax wrote:Woodruff wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?
The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.
True enough, yet I still find it frustratingly detailed. <grin>
(Also, I thought I was sort of making a joke.)
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Woodruff wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Woodruff wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?
The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.
True enough, yet I still find it frustratingly detailed. <grin>
(Also, I thought I was sort of making a joke.)
I think you should be stripped of your Starfleet commission for not knowing that.
At the very least.
Maybe even imprisoned on Rura Penthe.
“Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
― Voltaire
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
In other news, I nominate the ounce. It's had a thousand years to decide if it wants to be a measure of weight or volume, and still hasn't managed to make up its mind. Furthermore, even on days that it wants to be a measure of weight, it can't decide if it wants to be 1/16th of a pound (avoirdupois oz.) or 1/12 of a pound (apothecary's oz.).
“Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
― Voltaire
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Polls.
Bollocks.
Bollocks.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
The use of "Calorie" when in fact one should actually be using kilocalorie (seriously calorie actually refers to both 4.184 joules and 4184 joules!)
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
- BigBallinStalin
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
- Contact:
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Aggregate prices (GDP) and unemployment figures.
They're frequently used irresponsibly in order to promote poor policies which affect pretty much everyone on the planet.
They're frequently used irresponsibly in order to promote poor policies which affect pretty much everyone on the planet.
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Metsfanmax wrote:Woodruff wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?
The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.
NERD ALERT!!
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
- MegaProphet
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:12 pm
- Gender: Female
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
I'll nominate the barleycorn, unless I can nominate the entire imperial system
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Woodruff wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.
I nominate BTU.
I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?
The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.
True enough, yet I still find it frustratingly detailed. <grin>
(Also, I thought I was sort of making a joke.)
I think you should be stripped of your Starfleet commission for not knowing that.
At the very least.
Maybe even imprisoned on Rura Penthe.
Indeed. Spock would be sorely disappointed.
Actually, I teach it. We're studying the exploration of space this semester.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
MegaProphet wrote:I'll nominate the barleycorn, unless I can nominate the entire imperial system
I did not know that "barleycorn" was a measurement. Of crops, I presume?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
nietzsche wrote:NERD ALERT!!
In my house, the term "nerd" is a compliment, mister!
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
- Falkomagno
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:49 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Even in a rock or in a piece of wood. In sunsets often
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
In Colombia, we have the most stupid volume/weight unit: Yipao. 1 Yipao is the amount of load in a full jeep (in spanish, jeep can be said as "Yip"):


Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
poronkusema – (approximately 7.5 km) the distance a reindeer can travel before needing to stop to urinate
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_ ... easurement
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_ ... easurement
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Falkomagno wrote:In Colombia, we have the most stupid volume/weight unit: Yipao. 1 Yipao is the amount of load in a full jeep (in spanish, jeep can be said as "Yip"):
between the sex with farm animals thing, and now this, I pretty much think Colombia is just the Arkansas of South America, except with hotter women
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
- Haggis_McMutton
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am
- Gender: Male
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Woodruff wrote:MegaProphet wrote:I'll nominate the barleycorn, unless I can nominate the entire imperial system
I did not know that "barleycorn" was a measurement. Of crops, I presume?
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
- Haggis_McMutton
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am
- Gender: Male
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
Also, I put forward the system of measurement proposed by the legendary Donald Knuth(also known in these forums for his appearance in the "Serial killer or computer programmer" thread) in his first published paper.
Knuth published his first "scientific" article in a school magazine in 1957 under the title "Potrzebie System of Weights and Measures." In it, he defined the fundamental unit of length as the thickness of Mad #26, and named the fundamental unit of force "whatmeworry." Mad published the article in issue #33 (June 1957).
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
saxitoxin wrote:Falkomagno wrote:In Colombia, we have the most stupid volume/weight unit: Yipao. 1 Yipao is the amount of load in a full jeep (in spanish, jeep can be said as "Yip"):
between the sex with farm animals thing, and now this, I pretty much think Colombia is just the Arkansas of South America, except with hotter women
What do those huge sacks of coke weigh in pounds or kilograms?
- Metsfanmax
- Posts: 6722
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
I've never particularly liked the candela.
Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement
notyou2 wrote:Anthour
DId you just make that up? A search finds no matches.
“Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
― Voltaire

