ROUND 2:Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Which is the worst?

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
DoomYoshi
Posts: 10728
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

ROUND 2:Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by DoomYoshi »

Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.

I nominate BTU.
Last edited by DoomYoshi on Wed May 15, 2013 10:40 am, edited 3 times in total.
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Woodruff »

DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.

I nominate BTU.


I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
notyou2
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: In the here and now

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by notyou2 »

When driving distances are given in beers.
Image
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by AndyDufresne »

"Banana equivalent dose"

A banana equivalent dose (abbreviated BED) is a nonstandard unit of radiation exposure, defined as the additional dose a person will absorb from eating one banana.

The concept is based on the fact that bananas, like most organic material, naturally contain a certain amount of radioactive isotopes—even in the absence of any contamination due to human nuclear endeavors. The banana equivalent dose was meant to express the severity of exposure to radiation, such as resulting from nuclear power, nuclear weapons or medical procedures, in terms that would make sense to most people.



--Andy
User avatar
Metsfanmax
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Metsfanmax »

Woodruff wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.

I nominate BTU.


I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?


The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.

Image
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Woodruff »

Metsfanmax wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.

I nominate BTU.


I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?


The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.


True enough, yet I still find it frustratingly detailed. <grin>

(Also, I thought I was sort of making a joke.)
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28213
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Dukasaur »

Woodruff wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.

I nominate BTU.


I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?


The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.


True enough, yet I still find it frustratingly detailed. <grin>

(Also, I thought I was sort of making a joke.)

I think you should be stripped of your Starfleet commission for not knowing that.

At the very least.

Maybe even imprisoned on Rura Penthe.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28213
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Dukasaur »

In other news, I nominate the ounce. It's had a thousand years to decide if it wants to be a measure of weight or volume, and still hasn't managed to make up its mind. Furthermore, even on days that it wants to be a measure of weight, it can't decide if it wants to be 1/16th of a pound (avoirdupois oz.) or 1/12 of a pound (apothecary's oz.).
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Serbia
Posts: 12280
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Detroit

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Serbia »

Polls.

Bollocks.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Lootifer
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Lootifer »

The use of "Calorie" when in fact one should actually be using kilocalorie (seriously calorie actually refers to both 4.184 joules and 4184 joules!)
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Aggregate prices (GDP) and unemployment figures.

They're frequently used irresponsibly in order to promote poor policies which affect pretty much everyone on the planet.
User avatar
nietzsche
Posts: 4597
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:29 am
Gender: Female
Location: Fantasy Cooperstown

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by nietzsche »

Metsfanmax wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.

I nominate BTU.


I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?


The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.

Image


NERD ALERT!!
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
User avatar
MegaProphet
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:12 pm
Gender: Female

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by MegaProphet »

I'll nominate the barleycorn, unless I can nominate the entire imperial system
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Woodruff »

Dukasaur wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:Give me some candidates, I will put up a poll soon.

I nominate BTU.


I nominate the parsec - 3.26 light years? Why 3.26? Why not 3.25? Why not just 3?


The parsec is not defined as 3.26 light-years, it just happens to be equivalent to that. It comes from the fact that a parallax shift of one second of arc, using a baseline of the Earth's orbital separation from the Sun, corresponds to a physical linear distance equal to about 3.26 light years. In simpler terms, if an object appears to move 2/3600 degrees across the sky if you compare now and six months from now, it is at a distance of one parsec.


True enough, yet I still find it frustratingly detailed. <grin>

(Also, I thought I was sort of making a joke.)

I think you should be stripped of your Starfleet commission for not knowing that.
At the very least.
Maybe even imprisoned on Rura Penthe.


Indeed. Spock would be sorely disappointed.

Actually, I teach it. We're studying the exploration of space this semester.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Woodruff »

MegaProphet wrote:I'll nominate the barleycorn, unless I can nominate the entire imperial system


I did not know that "barleycorn" was a measurement. Of crops, I presume?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Woodruff »

nietzsche wrote:NERD ALERT!!


In my house, the term "nerd" is a compliment, mister!
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Falkomagno
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Even in a rock or in a piece of wood. In sunsets often

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Falkomagno »

In Colombia, we have the most stupid volume/weight unit: Yipao. 1 Yipao is the amount of load in a full jeep (in spanish, jeep can be said as "Yip"):

Image
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 13415
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by saxitoxin »

poronkusema – (approximately 7.5 km) the distance a reindeer can travel before needing to stop to urinate

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_ ... easurement
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 13415
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by saxitoxin »

Falkomagno wrote:In Colombia, we have the most stupid volume/weight unit: Yipao. 1 Yipao is the amount of load in a full jeep (in spanish, jeep can be said as "Yip"):

Image


between the sex with farm animals thing, and now this, I pretty much think Colombia is just the Arkansas of South America, except with hotter women
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Haggis_McMutton
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am
Gender: Male

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Haggis_McMutton »

Woodruff wrote:
MegaProphet wrote:I'll nominate the barleycorn, unless I can nominate the entire imperial system


I did not know that "barleycorn" was a measurement. Of crops, I presume?


Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Haggis_McMutton
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am
Gender: Male

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Haggis_McMutton »

Also, I put forward the system of measurement proposed by the legendary Donald Knuth(also known in these forums for his appearance in the "Serial killer or computer programmer" thread) in his first published paper.

Knuth published his first "scientific" article in a school magazine in 1957 under the title "Potrzebie System of Weights and Measures." In it, he defined the fundamental unit of length as the thickness of Mad #26, and named the fundamental unit of force "whatmeworry." Mad published the article in issue #33 (June 1957).
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13122
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by 2dimes »

saxitoxin wrote:
Falkomagno wrote:In Colombia, we have the most stupid volume/weight unit: Yipao. 1 Yipao is the amount of load in a full jeep (in spanish, jeep can be said as "Yip"):

Image


between the sex with farm animals thing, and now this, I pretty much think Colombia is just the Arkansas of South America, except with hotter women

What do those huge sacks of coke weigh in pounds or kilograms?
User avatar
Metsfanmax
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Metsfanmax »

I've never particularly liked the candela.
User avatar
notyou2
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: In the here and now

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by notyou2 »

Anthour
Image
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28213
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: Poll: Worst Unit of Measurement

Post by Dukasaur »

notyou2 wrote:Anthour

DId you just make that up? A search finds no matches.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”