Page 1 of 3

[CC4] ACE (40) vs. LOW (21) - Final 1/27

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 3:15 am
by angola
CONTACTS

Agents of the Chaotic Empire
[player]angola[/player]
[player]jetsetwilly[/player]

Legends of War
[player]Crazyirishman[/player]

[spoiler=Clan war]Clan wars in the round of 16 and the quarter finals of the Conqueror's Cup will use the following format:

- 61 total games
- 20 doubles
- 20 triples
- 20 quads
- Each clan member can only participate in 20 games per clan war
- The 61st game will be Trips on Classic, sunny, chained, no spoils[/spoiler]

[spoiler=Settings]Settings

-Trench is permitted for 20 percent of home games (6 games)
-30 Rounds For Trench games
-12 hour Fog of War Rule - see below
- Each map can only be used twice per clan per clan war but can only be used once per game type (i.e. once for triples and once for quads)
-Nukes and Unlimited forts are allowed with no restrictions.
-There will be no freestyle, speed, manual deployments & beta map games allowed
- Each clan will pick the map and settings for exactly half of the games. Excluding the tiebreaker[/spoiler]

[spoiler=Extra Rules]
  • 12 hour Fog rule is in effect.
  • When games are sent, they must already be created and fully "invited" by the home team. Once home games are sent, the away clan has 5 full days to fill the games
  • Deliberately timing out in Escalating and Nuclear games to avoid taking a spoil will not be tolerated by any players. If a team breaks this rule the game must be re-made. (unless the wronged clan want the game to stand)
[/spoiler]

[spoiler=Exchange dates]Batch 1
Nov. 3

4 quads
4 trips
2 doubles
Tie-breaker to be created by LOW

Batch 2
Nov. 17

4 quads
4 trips
2 doubles

Batch 3
Dec. 1

2 quads
2 trips
6 doubles[/spoiler]

GAMES
Batch 1
[spoiler=ACE home games]QUADS
Game 13546054 - Unification Italy, NS, CH, FOG - LOW win!
Game 13546056 - All Your Base Are Belong to Us NS, CH, FOG - ACE WIN!
Game 13546057 - Stalingrad NS, CH, FOG - ACE WIN!
Game 13546059 - Imperium Romanum ESC, CH, FOG - LOW win!
TRIPLES
Game 13546060 - Salem's Switch NS, CH, FOG - ACE win!
Game 13546062 - Baltic Crusades NS, CH, FOG, TRENCH - ACE WIN!
Game 13546063 - Vertex NS, CH, FOG - ACE WIN!
Game 13546064 - Thyseneal NS, CH, FOG - ACE WIN!
DOUBLES
Game 13546066 - 1982 ESC, CH, FOG, TRENCH - ACE WIN!
Game 13546067 - All Your Base Are Belong to Us - ESC, CH, FOG - ACE win![/spoiler]

[spoiler=LOW home games]Dubs
Game 13544834-WWII Poland no spoils chained fog trench - ACE win!
Game 13544828-Operation drug war- no spoils chained fog - ACE win!

Trips
Game 13544836-New World, no spoils, chained fog - ACE WIN!
Game 13544882-Fractured America, No Spoils, Chained, Fog - LOW win!
Game 13544844-Conquerman, no spoils, chained, fog - ACE win!
Game 13544853-Iberia, esc, chained, fog - LOW win!

Quads
Game 13544854-WWII Europe, No Spoils, Chained, Fog - LOW win!
Game 13544863-Hive- no spoils chained sunny - ACE WIN!
Game 13544858-Bamboo Jack, No Spoils, Chained, Fog - LOW win!
Game 13544872-NYC, Escalating, Chained sunny - LOW win!

*tiebreaker
Game 13544822-classic, no spoils, chained, sunny - LOW win![/spoiler]

Batch 2
[spoiler=ACE home games]QUADS
Game 13610014 First Nations Americas - NS, UN, FOG - ACE WIN!
Game 13610018 Rail Africa - ESC, CH, FOG - LOW win!
Game 13610021 Monsters - NS, CH, FOG - ACE WIN!
Game 13610029 Jamaica - NS, CH, FOG - ACE WIN!
TRIPS
Game 13610030 Unification Germany - NS, CH, FOG - ACE WIN!
Game 13610033 Third Crusade - NS, CH, FOG - LOW win!
Game 13610035 Lunar War - NS, CH, FOG - ACE WIN!
Game 13610036 Fractured China - NS, CH, FOG - ACE WIN!
DUBS
Game 13610039 Lunar War - NS, CH, FOG, TRENCH - ACE win!
Game 13610037 Gilgamesh - ESC, CH, FOG - ACE win![/spoiler]

[spoiler=LOW home games]Game 13611694-Antarctica, no spoils, unlimited, fog - LOW win!
Game 13611696- Lunar War, no spoils, unlimited, fog - LOW win!
Trips
Game 13611698- Battle For Iraq, no spoils, chained, fog - ACE win!
Game 13611702- Forbidden City, no spoils chained fog - LOW win!
Game 13611704- Rail Europe, no spoils, chained, fog - ACE win!
Game 13611706- World 2.1, no spoils, chained, fog - LOW win!
Quads
Game 13611714- Waterloo, no spoils, chained, fog - LOW win
Game 13611717- Cricket, no spoils, chained, fog - ACE WIN!
Game 13611731- Charleston, esc chained sunny - ACE WIN!
Game 13611722- Solar System, no spoils chained fog - ACE WIN![/spoiler]

Batch 3
[spoiler=ACE home games]QUADS
Game 13680129 - City Mogul - ACE win!
Game 13680119 - Feudal Epic - ACE WIN!
TRIPS
Game 13680144 - Cuban Missile Crisis - LOW win!
Game 13680131 - King's Court II - ACE WIN!
DUBS
Game 13680155 - Austrum - ACE WIN!
Game 13680152 - Woodboro - LOW win!
Game 13680148 - Tribal War Florida - LOW win!
Game 13680147 - Austerlitz - ACE WIN!
Game 13680145 - Age of Realms 3 - ACE WIN!
Game 13680137 - King's Court II - LOW win![/spoiler]

[spoiler=LOW home games]Dubs
Game 13679824- Germany - ACE WIN!
Game 13679819- Prohibition Chicago - ACE WIN!
Game 13679818- Trench Warfare - LOW win!
Game 13679823- Treasures of Galapagos - ACE WIN!
Game 13679817- Knights - ACE WIN!
Game 13679821- Dark continent - ACE WIN!
Trips
Game 13679815- Poison Rome - ACE WIN!
Game 13679814- Rail USA - LOW win!
Quads
Game 13679812- North America - ACE WIN!
Game 13679810- First nations North America - ACE win![/spoiler]

PLAYER COUNT
[spoiler=ACE]xxx[/spoiler]

[spoiler=LOW]xxx[/spoiler]

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 3:19 am
by benga
this will be interesting, 2 clans on the raise

HF

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 4:48 am
by Crazyirishman
LOW agrees to the terms listed above. This is going to be a great match

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:31 am
by maasman
Who's excited?

I'm excited 8-)

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 10:14 pm
by hyposquasher
I'm excited and I have two thumbs! I think I said that wrong...

Re: [CC4] ACE vs. LOW (starting Nov. 3)

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 10:34 pm
by IcePack
This should be a fun one to watch!!!

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 3:59 pm
by angola
Set 1 games have been exchanged.

Happy hunting.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:57 pm
by jj3044
GL LOW!

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 10:22 pm
by Crazyirishman
Good Luck ACE.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:47 am
by Swimmerdude99
Good luck to the lowest of the LOW.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 11:43 am
by hyposquasher
swimmerdude99 wrote:Good luck to the lowest of the LOW.


Ha! You got 'em good, buddy.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 12:44 pm
by Crazyirishman
hyposquasher wrote:
swimmerdude99 wrote:Good luck to the lowest of the LOW.


Ha! You got 'em good, buddy.


I've personally always wondered how other people pronounce our clan tag, since it can go either way on preference.
There's the option of pronouncing it like LOW and in toe, moe, doe, etc. and then you could pronounce in LOW as in wow, cow, or how.

nevertheless, I'm not clever enough to think of a way to use ACE in a sentence to get a laugh out of anybody.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:36 pm
by Leehar
I use the latter low
(as in cow :))

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:55 am
by angola
Leehar wrote:I use the latter low
(as in cow :))


Really? Definitely LOW TOE.

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:26 am
by hyposquasher
LOW TOE here too.

This is a quiet thread!

Good war so far. We have a lead in the score but it seems like things are pretty even so far in reality.

Re: [CC4] ACE (0) vs. LOW (0) - set 1

Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:49 am
by Genoke
Crazyirishman wrote:nevertheless, I'm not clever enough to think of a way to use ACE in a sentence to get a laugh out of anybody.

ACE in dutch = AAS, but when you speak it out, it sounds almost like Arse but without the R....
closest i can get....

Good letters chosen there!

this will be a very close war i guess, even with the slight point advantage of ACE, i think both clans will have their hands full to get a win out of it!

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 12:24 pm
by Crazyirishman
hyposquasher wrote:This is a quiet thread!

Good war so far. We have a lead in the score but it seems like things are pretty even so far in reality.


We're currently employing the "dig ourselves a hole" strategy so we can remain focused for the other two batches. ;)

And in terms of a quiet thread, we're kinda forum boring. There's only a handful of us the post in the public forums regularly, so it'd be tough for us to live up to a KORT-TOFU thread Maybe to spice things up I can file a C&A report against a few of you or you do the vice-versa for us? That'll get some posts directed this way.

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 12:28 pm
by hyposquasher
Crazyirishman wrote:
hyposquasher wrote:This is a quiet thread!

Good war so far. We have a lead in the score but it seems like things are pretty even so far in reality.


We're currently employing the "dig ourselves a hole" strategy so we can remain focused for the other two batches. ;)

And in terms of a quiet thread, we're kinda forum boring. There's only a handful of us the post in the public forums regularly, so it'd be tough for us to live up to a KORT-TOFU thread Maybe to spice things up I can file a C&A report against a few of you or you do the vice-versa for us? That'll get some posts directed this way.


It's safe to say we're pretty much the same way. I like your idea of C&A reports. I'm going to file one right now to say that you guys have been working together in private messages instead of in public chat.

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:32 am
by Crazyirishman
hyposquasher wrote:I'm going to file one right now to say that you guys have been working together in private messages instead of in public chat.


whoa whoa whoa!! Since when are we allowed to use gamechat to communicate. I thought we had agreed in the pre-war talks that the only acceptable form of team communication was through nude selfies? If you guys have been using game chat the whole time, I demand that all games be remade you fucking cheaters!

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:51 am
by LEQUEEN
I agree. Ace talk too much. I think 5 of their wins should turn to lose as penalty. Or even better ace should divide in 2 clans :o 1 can keep the "ac" and the othe the "e" lol

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:23 am
by hyposquasher
LEQUEEN wrote:I agree. Ace talk too much. I think 5 of their wins should turn to lose as penalty. Or even better ace should divide in 2 clans :o 1 can keep the "ac" and the othe the "e" lol


Something like one called AoC and the other called Emp?

And btw, what do our nude selfies have to do with CC?

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:21 pm
by Foxglove
Crazyirishman wrote:
hyposquasher wrote:This is a quiet thread!

Good war so far. We have a lead in the score but it seems like things are pretty even so far in reality.


We're currently employing the "dig ourselves a hole" strategy so we can remain focused for the other two batches. ;)

And in terms of a quiet thread, we're kinda forum boring. There's only a handful of us the post in the public forums regularly, so it'd be tough for us to live up to a KORT-TOFU thread Maybe to spice things up I can file a C&A report against a few of you or you do the vice-versa for us? That'll get some posts directed this way.


If you need any tips on how to craft some clever yet cutting remarks or how to spin yourselves up in a nexus of outrage and ill-will, just shoot me a PM and I'll offer you some maybe free, maybe not advice!

Re: [CC4] ACE (5) vs. LOW (1) - set 1

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:42 pm
by jj3044
hyposquasher wrote:
LEQUEEN wrote:I agree. Ace talk too much. I think 5 of their wins should turn to lose as penalty. Or even better ace should divide in 2 clans :o 1 can keep the "ac" and the othe the "e" lol


Something like one called AoC and the other called Emp?

And btw, what do our nude selfies have to do with CC?

What would happen to poor [player]Parkon[/player]? We would have to cut the poor bastard in half... :shock:

Re: [CC4] ACE (7) vs. LOW (2) - set 1

Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:11 am
by LEQUEEN
Well ... Its your idea ... But i have to say that ... I love it!!! Lol. Maybe this way he can stop being best in spain and be 2 middle table players. All i can say for him is "sit happends" ;)

Re: [CC4] ACE (7) vs. LOW (2) - set 1

Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:55 pm
by PaRKoN
I am fine with that as far as it comes with double of everything (troops, luck...)