Dubs: D1: Game 18195146 City Mogul — ns, ch, fog D2: Game 18195147 WWll Iwo Jima — ns, ch, fog, tr, 30 rnds D3: Game 18195149 Imperium Romanium — ns, ch, fog D4: Game 18195151 Austro-Hungariam Empire — ns, ch, fog, tr, 30 rnds
Davekettering, thank you for setting up this thread. Everything looks great!
RA agrees to all specifications, terms and rules of engagement.
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M vs RA [0 of 43]
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 12:23 pm
by Keefie
Approved
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M vs RA [0 of 43]
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 1:08 pm
by iAmCaffeine
Keefie wrote:Approved
Unapproved.
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M vs RA [0 of 43]
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:59 am
by emilywink
iAmCaffeine wrote:
Keefie wrote:Approved
Unapproved.
Caffiene always involving his lawyers and making things held up in court. S&M's lawyer fees are outrageous, but i think a lot of our recent success is due to our strong legal department.
Keefie, can we get reapproval or should i contact legal?
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M vs RA [0 of 43]
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:30 pm
by Keefie
emilywink wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
Keefie wrote:Approved
Unapproved.
Caffiene always involving his lawyers and making things held up in court. S&M's lawyer fees are outrageous, but i think a lot of our recent success is due to our strong legal department.
Keefie, can we get reapproval or should i contact legal?
Maybe Josko could raise this with Admin
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M vs RA [0 of 43]
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:55 pm
by iAmCaffeine
emilywink wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
Keefie wrote:Approved
Unapproved.
Caffiene always involving his lawyers and making things held up in court. S&M's lawyer fees are outrageous, but i think a lot of our recent success is due to our strong legal department.
Keefie, can we get reapproval or should i contact legal?
I think it's quite simple to solve if we just apply some basic science. After all, science is the art of asking the right questions instead of providing the right answers.
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M vs RA [0 of 43]
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 3:03 am
by Silly Knig-it
Why is our thread allowed to be cluttered with garbage?
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M vs RA [0 of 43]
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:19 pm
by Arama86n
Silly Knig-it wrote:Why is our thread allowed to be cluttered with garbage?
You're usually the life of the party wherever you go, am I right?
It's called a little light-hearted banter. Also known as "fun". We are very sorry we shattered the deathly silence of which you are so fond. Run along now.
Speaking of silence... I hear a heard of cows thundering this way. With.... armed monkeys riding on their backs. Knig-its will be slaughtered by the dozen. Even once silly knig-its, that have gone sour with age.
And so it came to pass. The last of the Knig-it's stood his ground bravely with a sour expression on his face as emilywink thundered into sight with Nate the Great on her back. Death came quickly for the old knig-it. As it does.
Have fun both clans. Or... S&M anyway. Wouldn't want to impose fun on those that wish to avoid it.
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M vs RA [0 of 43]
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 3:17 pm
by emilywink
Arama86n wrote:
Silly Knig-it wrote:Why is our thread allowed to be cluttered with garbage?
You're usually the life of the party wherever you go, am I right?
It's called a little light-hearted banter. Also known as "fun". We are very sorry we shattered the deathly silence of which you are so fond. Run along now.
Speaking of silence... I hear a heard of cows thundering this way. With.... armed monkeys riding on their backs. Knig-its will be slaughtered by the dozen. Even once silly knig-its, that have gone sour with age.
And so it came to pass. The last of the Knig-it's stood his ground bravely with a sour expression on his face as emilywink thundered into sight with Nate the Great on her back. Death came quickly for the old knig-it. As it does.
Have fun both clans. Or... S&M anyway. Wouldn't want to impose fun on those that wish to avoid it.
hahaha thanks Arama,
and in response to your question Silly Knig-it, i have only seen one garbage post so far... so it's not too bad.
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M vs RA [0 of 43]
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 3:36 pm
by Arama86n
Oh, snap. beautiful. Sometimes, I throw my words around, battering like gale-force winds. Emily loads one carefully chosen sentence into her 50. cal, and just... head-shots.
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M [1] vs RA [0]
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2018 12:06 am
by VioIet
First Victory goes to S&M.
S&M are fierce competitors. Over half of the first round games seem to be swinging their way, and it is definitely not luck. Good, sound, and skilled play all around.
RA is hoping to get our first win soon
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M [16] vs RA [10]
Posted: Wed May 02, 2018 10:36 am
by emilywink
think we are starting to pull away some, but you have been tough RA. it's been good competition and fun. you had me biting my nails
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M [16] vs RA [10]
Posted: Tue May 08, 2018 1:07 am
by VioIet
emilywink wrote:think we are starting to pull away some, but you have been tough RA. it's been good competition and fun. you had me biting my nails
Thank you for the kind words Emily. I think my squad is much more talented than our rank indicates. I've always felt that way - since 2013.
I was very proud of RA's performance in Round One. We were doing our best to keep up In Round Two, we have made two many mistakes in too many games.
But we honestly didn't expect to beat S&M. Your group is amazing, and this war certainly shows why S&M has been ranked #1 many times.
This war has been very enjoyable. I wish you the best of luck in your next round!
Re: [CC8] Round 2 S&M [27] vs RA [14]; S&M Wins!!
Posted: Tue May 22, 2018 4:01 am
by josko.ri
Thanks for the war RA! I was afraid for the outcome after seeing we had only 12-10 lead after set 1
Re: [CC8] R2: S&M (28) vs RA (15) - S&M Wins! - Final 5/30/1
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:04 am
by groovysmurf
Databases updated, privileges removed, medals awarded, topic moved