Page 1 of 2

Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:54 pm
by Snorri1234
I'm a little on the fence about this question, but I'm leaning towards "yes".

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:57 pm
by Frigidus
Catholics are close to people. They're sort of like Neanderthals. It's amazing, as soon as they convert their basic genetic structure mutates to make then distinctly less human. This is why, despite not being allowed to use birth control, they don't overwhelm the population. When they mate with real humans, their offspring are sterile.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:10 pm
by Neoteny
Image

=

Image

?

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:19 pm
by Timminz
Everyone knows that Catholics are an inside job.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:45 pm
by Zeppflyer
I'd have to go with 'No.'

Irish Catholics are something more than human. Short of angels perhaps, but not by much. Italian Catholics on the other hand..... Well, we pray for them.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 7:54 pm
by Utafar
wow, so you generalize a group of people as inhuman because they have a difference in belief? If any one is a neanderthal it's all of you for posting and supporting this piece of biased, intolerant shit.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:16 pm
by icedagger
Utafar wrote:wow, so you generalize a group of people as inhuman because they have a difference in belief? If any one is a neanderthal it's all of you for posting and supporting this piece of biased, intolerant shit.


That sounds like catholic talk to me...

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:42 pm
by Utafar
icedagger wrote:
Utafar wrote:wow, so you generalize a group of people as inhuman because they have a difference in belief? If any one is a neanderthal it's all of you for posting and supporting this piece of biased, intolerant shit.


That sounds like catholic talk to me...



Nope, as of now I'm not affiliated with any religion. It still doesn't mean I'm going to call everyone who doesn't agree with me fucking inhuman.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:47 pm
by e_i_pi
Utafar wrote:Nope, as of now I'm not affiliated with any religion. It still doesn't mean I'm going to call everyone who doesn't agree with me fucking inhuman.

I don't recall Catholics being called inhuman. It clearly states that they are Neanderthals. I hope you're not implying that Neanderthals are inhuman. That's just downright cruel

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:51 pm
by Utafar
Frigidus wrote:Catholics are close to people. They're sort of like Neanderthals. It's amazing, as soon as they convert their basic genetic structure mutates to make them distinctly less human. This is why, despite not being allowed to use birth control, they don't overwhelm the population. When they mate with real humans, their offspring are sterile.


He said they are less then human, or not real humans, which is basically saying they are inhuman.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:03 pm
by FabledIntegral
I'm fairly confident Utafar is a Catholic trying to cover up. Personally, I tend to believe they are humans, although I can understand why people think otherwise. I'm kinda tolerant in that area... definitely controversial though.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:04 pm
by e_i_pi
Utafar wrote:
Frigidus wrote:Catholics are close to people. They're sort of like Neanderthals. It's amazing, as soon as they convert their basic genetic structure mutates to make them distinctly less human. This is why, despite not being allowed to use birth control, they don't overwhelm the population. When they mate with real humans, their offspring are sterile.


He said they are less then human, or not real humans, which is basically saying they are inhuman.

Well, if we're arguing somantics, I would say that the above statement does not so much suggest they are inhuman, so much as non human. There is a difference. Inhuman implies cruelty, nonhuman implies unworthiness to be part of the race. Looks like it calls them mutants as well, but the analogy to Neanderthals points towards devolution.

In summation, the implication is more that a Catholic is some sort of an "untouchable devolved subspecies mutation"

I hope that clears the air

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:05 pm
by Martin Ronne
Neoteny wrote:Image

=

Image

?




:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I get it!

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:09 pm
by Utafar
The rest of my family is Catholic, and they think I am, it takes a lot for me to have faith in a religion. All I know that if there is a God, he sure as hell didn't do all that stuff with adam and eve. If there is a God he definitely just created everything with the Big Bang or whatever, created science and just let everything play out. Maybe popping in now and then to interfere.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:11 pm
by mpjh
What is a Catholic, is that a cult or something?

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:16 pm
by Utafar
e_i_pi wrote:
Utafar wrote:
Frigidus wrote:Catholics are close to people. They're sort of like Neanderthals. It's amazing, as soon as they convert their basic genetic structure mutates to make them distinctly less human. This is why, despite not being allowed to use birth control, they don't overwhelm the population. When they mate with real humans, their offspring are sterile.


He said they are less then human, or not real humans, which is basically saying they are inhuman.

Well, if we're arguing somantics, I would say that the above statement does not so much suggest they are inhuman, so much as non human. There is a difference. Inhuman implies cruelty, nonhuman implies unworthiness to be part of the race. Looks like it calls them mutants as well, but the analogy to Neanderthals points towards devolution.

In summation, the implication is more that a Catholic is some sort of an "untouchable devolved subspecies mutation"

I hope that clears the air


after visiting dictionary.com I have concluded that nonhuman has no definition and inhuman was the only appropriate word to sum up what he said

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:21 pm
by jonesthecurl
nonhuman is life, Jim, but not as we know it.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:23 pm
by e_i_pi
after visiting dictionary.com I have concluded that nonhuman has no definition and inhuman was the only appropriate word to sum up what he said

You must be Catholic. I found it no problems:

non⋅hu⋅man   /nɒnˈhyumən or, often, -ˈyu-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [non-hyoo-muhn or, often, -yoo-] Show IPA Pronunciation

–adjective
1. not human.
2. not displaying the emotions, sympathies, intelligence, etc., of most human beings.
3. not intended for consumption by humans: nonhuman products such as soaps and detergents.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:32 pm
by InkL0sed
Humans, are they human?

I'm leaning towards "no"

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:44 pm
by PLAYER57832
InkL0sed wrote:Humans, are they human?

I'm leaning towards "no"

The truest statement yet! :lol:

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:16 pm
by Frigidus
Look, this is basic science. Old World monkeys evolved from early mammals, an offshoot of which is the 'Homo' genus. Breaking off from the Homo egaster come the three remaining survivors of our genus: Homo sapiens, Homo catholica, and Homo sexuals.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:23 pm
by Neoteny
And recent phylogenetic evidence shows that Catholics are closer to gays than any other clade.

God bless Charles Darwin.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:59 pm
by jonesthecurl
Frigidus wrote:Look, this is basic science. Old World monkeys evolved from early mammals, an offshoot of which is the 'Homo' genus. Breaking off from the Homo egaster come the three remaining survivors of our genus: Homo sapiens, Homo catholica, and Homo sexuals.



You forgot Homo Simpson.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:44 am
by targetman377
i am Roman Cathlic so do you think i am not a human. Really? wow you are dumb.

Re: Catholics, are they people?

Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:53 am
by e_i_pi
targetman377 wrote:i am Roman Cathlic so do you think i am not a human. Really? wow you are dumb.

We're talking about Catholics guy, we ain't the dumb ones