Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
Map Name: ???? (Formerly Shadowlands / Big Map)
Map Region: Fictional
Territories: 96
Bonus Regions: 12
Gameplay: Classic
Description:
Map Idea Discussion Here.
I feel the site is lacking in classic gameplay, large geographal maps. I started the iron curtain, but didn't like how difficult is was getting, in regards to keeping accurate borders. This will be a fictional land. I want to focus on gameplay first. Once that is ironed out, I will create the graphics for the map.
I know there's not much commenting when it comes to gameplay, but if you don't mind, let me know if you think this looks okay. I've had a lot of positive feedback from the Charleston map - lots of small bonus areas, classic gameplay. This will be similar, just on a larger scale. Charleston has 60 territories.
Thanks.
[bigimg]http://www.rjbeals.com/shadowlands/shadowlands-gameplay-07-13-2009.jpg[/bigimg]
Map Region: Fictional
Territories: 96
Bonus Regions: 12
Gameplay: Classic
Description:
Map Idea Discussion Here.
I feel the site is lacking in classic gameplay, large geographal maps. I started the iron curtain, but didn't like how difficult is was getting, in regards to keeping accurate borders. This will be a fictional land. I want to focus on gameplay first. Once that is ironed out, I will create the graphics for the map.
I know there's not much commenting when it comes to gameplay, but if you don't mind, let me know if you think this looks okay. I've had a lot of positive feedback from the Charleston map - lots of small bonus areas, classic gameplay. This will be similar, just on a larger scale. Charleston has 60 territories.
Thanks.
[bigimg]http://www.rjbeals.com/shadowlands/shadowlands-gameplay-07-13-2009.jpg[/bigimg]

- captainwalrus
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:19 pm
- Location: Finnmark
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
The impassible below the light green boarder should end before the last one, so there is an extra boarder and it isn't so linear.
The bottom teritoriy of the light blue region could have a connection to the one bottom island of the red region.
The territories seems pretty big, I wonder if you could fit more in than you have. This could have a lot more territories, I think. 88 isn't that big.
The bottom teritoriy of the light blue region could have a connection to the one bottom island of the red region.
The territories seems pretty big, I wonder if you could fit more in than you have. This could have a lot more territories, I think. 88 isn't that big.
~ CaptainWalrus
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
captainwalrus wrote:The impassible below the light green boarder should end before the last one, so there s an extra boarder and it isn't so linear.
Will Do.
captainwalrus wrote:The bottom teritoriy of the light blue region could have a connection to the one bottom island of the red region.
Was thinking about this, but didn't think it was necessary. But I'll create it, I don't think it will be that much of diffference.
captainwalrus wrote:The territories seems pretty big, I wonder if you could fit more in than you have. This could have a lot more territories, I think. 88 isn't that big.
I was considering smaller regions - but this is the large map don't forget. I was maybe going to go with 108 regions, and I still can - just let me know if you think it's needed.
Thanks captainwalrus for the feedback - just the type I'm looking for.

-
whitestazn88
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: behind you
- Contact:
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
i like it, but i think more bonuses would be even better? and some with less territs... i mean 8 territs for +3? i don't quite like that
- the.killing.44
- Posts: 4724
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
- Contact:
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
whitestazn88 wrote:i like it, but i think more bonuses would be even better? and some with less territs... i mean 8 territs for +3? i don't quite like that
Yeah I gotta agree with him. That's one of the things that makes Charleston my favorite map — the way that everyone can grab a set of bonuses on their own "island." Looks like it'll be sweet though.
.44
-
WidowMakers
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Detroit, MI
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
Will this all fit on the small map?
And I agree with the last poster. More bonus groups would be better.
Maybe break up the blue/green and one of the tan groups in the middle.
WM
And I agree with the last poster. More bonus groups would be better.
Maybe break up the blue/green and one of the tan groups in the middle.
WM

Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
WidowMakers wrote:Will this all fit on the small map?
And I agree with the last poster. More bonus groups would be better.
Maybe break up the blue/green and one of the tan groups in the middle.
WM
I concur. More smaller groups would be better, perhaps push it out ot 15 or 16 continents.

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
- mattosaurus
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:38 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
Maybe have smaller groups inside larger ones similar to World 2.1.
Check out my map in the making: Testosterone VS Estrogen
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=241&t=85196
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=241&t=85196
-
el-presidente
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:14 pm
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
mattosaurus wrote:Maybe have smaller groups inside larger ones similar to World 2.1.
Ya I was looking at the older versions and it seemed like this one had the bonuses inside bonuses. I liked that.
[bigimg]http://www.rjbeals.com/shadowlands/shadowlands-rjbeals-beta-05.jpg[/bigimg]
- captainwalrus
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:19 pm
- Location: Finnmark
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
108 terrritories would deffinently be better, and like 18 bonus regions.
~ CaptainWalrus
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
This looks like a reverse Charleston.
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: Shadowlands / Big Map (Gameplay Discussion Only)
[Moved]
It would appear that development of this map has stalled. If the mapmaker wants to continue with the map, then one of the Foundry Moderators will be able to help put the thread back into the Foundry system, after an update has been made.
It would appear that development of this map has stalled. If the mapmaker wants to continue with the map, then one of the Foundry Moderators will be able to help put the thread back into the Foundry system, after an update has been made.
