Moderator: Community Team
porkenbeans wrote:If you do not know how to read, Maybe your mommy can read it for you.Aradhus wrote:porkenbeans wrote:look whos' screaming now. lol.Aradhus wrote:So.. How much research was actually done on this subject? (Or did the "research" amount to 20 to 30 regulars everyday screaming "farmers farmers kill them ban them they ruin teh siiiteeeeee!" until the admin couldn't take it anymore..
1 - If somebody sent me a personal message minutes after I joined this site, asking me if I wanted to play a game, I would have thought "wow, this looks like a friendly place."
2 - Would I have gotten my ass kicked? Yes, actually my first game I did get my ass kicked, and I'm pretty positive that stands for about 99%(at least) of all the players that join CC. Regardless of who they played.
3 - If there was research done on farming etc, new players, the like, is it available to the'community'? Can I read it, andwas any information compiled on freestyle team farming, uh I mean games. Freestyle team games, I said farming, I meant games.
You guys just do not get it. People come here to play risk, ...NOT rape the newbie.
What the hell are you talking about? Why did you quote my post?
Have you read the rules to this forum? Exactly what contribution did your post make to the topic?
Zero - spam
Some people do desire a ranking system that would indicate that a player ranked higher than another player tends to beat them head-to-head. The current system does not always indicate this because there are many techniques for inflating your score without playing peers, as the OP has stated.MuEagles79 wrote: your logic is completely faulty unless you believe only people of similar ranks/experience should be playing each other
Very good point. Like some other posters said, it would be much more effective to change the scoring system to not reward farming on the scale that it currently does than to attempt to define farming on a case by case basis and create a set of possibly cumbersome rules.MuEagles79 wrote: I just see a slippery slope here of determining what constitutes "newbie farming".
Not true. A non-farmer can take the person into a game, carefully explaining moves and how to read the board; offering advice on what to stay away from for a while; so that in game #2 the newbie has a fighting chance and some info on how not to get suckered in as a field for plowing.obliterationX wrote:The only way a newbie can learn is by being exploited at the cold hands of a seemingly kind and friendly noob farmer.

you really telling me that you didn't notice the sarcasm in the post you quoted?stahrgazer wrote:Not true. A non-farmer can take the person into a game, carefully explaining moves and how to read the board; offering advice on what to stay away from for a while; so that in game #2 the newbie has a fighting chance and some info on how not to get suckered in as a field for plowing.obliterationX wrote:The only way a newbie can learn is by being exploited at the cold hands of a seemingly kind and friendly noob farmer.
Yeah well said KH.King_Herpes wrote:It's about damn time. I mean, how long were you going to let that madness continue? It's an outrage I tell ya! Darn farmers, all they care about is points points points...
Sarcasm,Do we have that here too?Nephilim wrote:you really telling me that you didn't notice the sarcasm in the post you quoted?stahrgazer wrote:Not true. A non-farmer can take the person into a game, carefully explaining moves and how to read the board; offering advice on what to stay away from for a while; so that in game #2 the newbie has a fighting chance and some info on how not to get suckered in as a field for plowing.obliterationX wrote:The only way a newbie can learn is by being exploited at the cold hands of a seemingly kind and friendly noob farmer.
Excellent observation.mikeyfranz wrote:What if you could solve the problem of newbie farming mathematically? For example, what if Newbies started with 200 points instead of 1000 points. Then if a player with 2000 points, beats a newbie with 200 points, he will only receive 1 point instead of 10 points.
The problem is that by starting with 1000 points, a newbie has more points than he's worth. If you have 3000 points, you have probably earned it. If you have 1000 points you might not necessarily be worth that many yet, therefore you become a potentially easy target for a farmer.
If imposed I think all other players scores should also drop by 800, and the numbers associated with ranking changes should also be adjusted accordingly so nobody drops rank. Perhaps 200 isn't the right number either. Maybe it's 500, or 100, or 0, but I think this concept is worth considering. I also don't know how it would work if a player got below 0, but I would love to hear people's suggestions and comments on this idea.

I completely agree. If someone is naive enough to set up a game they have no clue about or join a game that is already set up then its their own fault for doing so. So telling me I can't join a game because of my rank after I have paid for access to this site is completely absurd. And posting a "rule" in the forums is just as absurd as well, if I click on the rules tab and see nothing that dictates what games I can join and which ones I can not then is it really a rule?FireStar wrote:team freestyle farming... i don't know why someone would start a team freestyle game on doodle earth ( or something similar) with unlimited forts... if they do then its their own fault... just my opinionPhlaim wrote:Is "Map specializing"(for example most of King_herpes latest games) and "team-freestyle-farming"(for example: Game 3906454) a part of this?
It would definitely have to be 500. When I first joined, I had previous experience with Risk and was probably at least a corporal in terms of skill level. If I had gotten lucky and beaten seven Sergeants 1st Class with scores of 1500, they would have lost 60 points each, and my score would rocket up to 920. Not exactly fair, imo.mikeyfranz wrote:What if you could solve the problem of newbie farming mathematically? For example, what if Newbies started with 200 points instead of 1000 points. Then if a player with 2000 points, beats a newbie with 200 points, he will only receive 1 point instead of 10 points.
The problem is that by starting with 1000 points, a newbie has more points than he's worth. If you have 3000 points, you have probably earned it. If you have 1000 points you might not necessarily be worth that many yet, therefore you become a potentially easy target for a farmer.
If imposed I think all other players scores should also drop by 800, and the numbers associated with ranking changes should also be adjusted accordingly so nobody drops rank. Perhaps 200 isn't the right number either. Maybe it's 500, or 100, or 0, but I think this concept is worth considering. I also don't know how it would work if a player got below 0, but I would love to hear people's suggestions and comments on this idea.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
King_Herpes wrote:It's about damn time. I mean, how long were you going to let that madness continue? It's an outrage I tell ya! Darn farmers, all they care about is points points points...
neanderpaul14 wrote:King_Herpes wrote:It's about damn time. I mean, how long were you going to let that madness continue? It's an outrage I tell ya! Darn farmers, all they care about is points points points...
![]()
![]()
![]()
Awright Herps any ideas what we should do to the farmers??
I think what we need here is a 'farming treatment program'. Responsible members can set up some multis and distribute them liberally around the site on fave farming maps. King_H and his ilk can have fun finding them and enjoy that special satisfaction of beating a deadbeat. It is not as easy as it looks you know! Every month we'll create less multis and gradually wean our favourite farming friends off of their nasty little addiction. It is the only humane thing to do!King_Herpes wrote:neanderpaul14 wrote:King_Herpes wrote:It's about damn time. I mean, how long were you going to let that madness continue? It's an outrage I tell ya! Darn farmers, all they care about is points points points...
![]()
![]()
![]()
Awright Herps any ideas what we should do to the farmers??
Well, actually since you asked. I find it kind of imperialistic to just come through and snatch our pride right out of our hands. We were one with the spiritual Conquer Club and we mothered every ? that came into our lives. Just because we appeared to be primitive and not as domesticated doesn't mean we aren't kind, gentle, and giving souls. I personally believe that we are entitled to some form of reservation and casino offerings. I did subtly warn Twill that if we continue to be suppressed and erased from CC history than there will be an uprising where we attack your trains and burn your carriages. However, I've grown a bit depressed and am slowly forgetting what it means to be a farmer *Sigh*. I'm currently drinking my 4th bottle of hairspray while loathing my fallen fellow warriors and spirit ancestors.
-Chief Herp, last of the herpaewa farmers

That's not a bad suggestion, Mr C...Mr Changsha wrote:I think what we need here is a 'farming treatment program'. Responsible members can set up some multis and distribute them liberally around the site on fave farming maps. King_H and his ilk can have fun finding them and enjoy that special satisfaction of beating a deadbeat. It is not as easy as it looks you know! Every month we'll create less multis and gradually wean our favourite farming friends off of their nasty little addiction. It is the only humane thing to do!King_Herpes wrote:neanderpaul14 wrote:King_Herpes wrote:It's about damn time. I mean, how long were you going to let that madness continue? It's an outrage I tell ya! Darn farmers, all they care about is points points points...
![]()
![]()
![]()
Awright Herps any ideas what we should do to the farmers??
Well, actually since you asked. I find it kind of imperialistic to just come through and snatch our pride right out of our hands. We were one with the spiritual Conquer Club and we mothered every ? that came into our lives. Just because we appeared to be primitive and not as domesticated doesn't mean we aren't kind, gentle, and giving souls. I personally believe that we are entitled to some form of reservation and casino offerings. I did subtly warn Twill that if we continue to be suppressed and erased from CC history than there will be an uprising where we attack your trains and burn your carriages. However, I've grown a bit depressed and am slowly forgetting what it means to be a farmer *Sigh*. I'm currently drinking my 4th bottle of hairspray while loathing my fallen fellow warriors and spirit ancestors.
-Chief Herp, last of the herpaewa farmers
May I just nominate myself as the kind of responsible member Lack/Twill are looking for.ManBungalow wrote:That's not a bad suggestion, Mr C...Mr Changsha wrote:I think what we need here is a 'farming treatment program'. Responsible members can set up some multis and distribute them liberally around the site on fave farming maps. King_H and his ilk can have fun finding them and enjoy that special satisfaction of beating a deadbeat. It is not as easy as it looks you know! Every month we'll create less multis and gradually wean our favourite farming friends off of their nasty little addiction. It is the only humane thing to do!King_Herpes wrote:neanderpaul14 wrote:King_Herpes wrote:It's about damn time. I mean, how long were you going to let that madness continue? It's an outrage I tell ya! Darn farmers, all they care about is points points points...
![]()
![]()
![]()
Awright Herps any ideas what we should do to the farmers??
Well, actually since you asked. I find it kind of imperialistic to just come through and snatch our pride right out of our hands. We were one with the spiritual Conquer Club and we mothered every ? that came into our lives. Just because we appeared to be primitive and not as domesticated doesn't mean we aren't kind, gentle, and giving souls. I personally believe that we are entitled to some form of reservation and casino offerings. I did subtly warn Twill that if we continue to be suppressed and erased from CC history than there will be an uprising where we attack your trains and burn your carriages. However, I've grown a bit depressed and am slowly forgetting what it means to be a farmer *Sigh*. I'm currently drinking my 4th bottle of hairspray while loathing my fallen fellow warriors and spirit ancestors.
-Chief Herp, last of the herpaewa farmers
It does seem a bit open to abuse; even if Lack/Twill does/do find responsible members...

fucking ridiculousregistered_user wrote:I think it'd be just as easy to change the points equation from:
(loser's score / winner's score) * 20, up to a maximum of 100 points from each opponent
to
((loser's score / winner's score) * 20) - 5
Anyone over 2500 points who takes on a newbie would actually lose points.
cheers.
Jeff Hardy wrote:fucking ridiculousregistered_user wrote:I think it'd be just as easy to change the points equation from:
(loser's score / winner's score) * 20, up to a maximum of 100 points from each opponent
to
((loser's score / winner's score) * 20) - 5
Anyone over 2500 points who takes on a newbie would actually lose points.
cheers.
stupidest idea ive ever heard