Moderator: Community Team
i am just the other way around, myself. FDR's handling of the depression and WWII was extraordinary, and while in both -- certainly in the latter -- he had able help, he was really a leading figure without whom history may have turned out very differently. imagine a john nance garner or a hoover dealing with wwii... ugh.InkL0sed wrote:I'd go with Lincoln first off. I don't think anybody else could have possibly managed the Civil War as well as he did. FDR comes in a close second.
It's true that both did some pretty unconstitutional things, but I think Lincoln was more justified, which is one reason why I put him higher than FDR. I mean, the Depression and WWII were both pretty serious, but I don't think even both of them together were quite as an existential threat to the country's very existence. And when you're literally trying to save the country from falling apart, temporarily suspending habeas corpus is pretty understandable. It kind of reminds me of the Romans' concept of the ideal temporary farmer-dictator in times of war, like Cincinnatus, who after the war was over would immediately cede his power to the Senate and return to his farm.SultanOfSurreal wrote:i am just the other way around, myself. FDR's handling of the depression and WWII was extraordinary, and while in both -- certainly in the latter -- he had able help, he was really a leading figure without whom history may have turned out very differently. imagine a john nance garner or a hoover dealing with wwii... ugh.InkL0sed wrote:I'd go with Lincoln first off. I don't think anybody else could have possibly managed the Civil War as well as he did. FDR comes in a close second.
to be honest though both lincoln and roosevelt made some pretty serious violations of the constitution. FDR moreso than Lincoln, I think, but neither was a saint by any means. they used government more as a tool than served it as a venerated institution.
SultanOfSurreal wrote:i am just the other way around, myself. FDR's handling of the depression and WWII was extraordinary, and while in both -- certainly in the latter -- he had able help, he was really a leading figure without whom history may have turned out very differently. imagine a john nance garner or a hoover dealing with wwii... ugh.InkL0sed wrote:I'd go with Lincoln first off. I don't think anybody else could have possibly managed the Civil War as well as he did. FDR comes in a close second.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
You're a Brit, so you're excused for such a predictable error in judgement.InkL0sed wrote:
I'd go with Lincoln first off. I don't think anybody else could have possibly managed the Civil War as well as he did. FDR comes in a close second.
yes damn that lincoln, why did he have to attack fort sumterb.k. barunt wrote: Managed the Civil War? He started the fooking thing.
Close; I'm a New Yorker.b.k. barunt wrote:You're a Brit, so you're excused for such a predictable error in judgement.InkL0sed wrote:
I'd go with Lincoln first off. I don't think anybody else could have possibly managed the Civil War as well as he did. FDR comes in a close second.
Even if you were serious, it is far too soon to truly judge his impact. Even Reagan is a stretch.xxtig12683xx wrote:Where is the g.w bush option?
I simply don't like FDR all that much. Research the FDR court-packing scheme and you will know what I mean.SultanOfSurreal wrote:i am just the other way around, myself. FDR's handling of the depression and WWII was extraordinary, and while in both -- certainly in the latter -- he had able help, he was really a leading figure without whom history may have turned out very differently. imagine a john nance garner or a hoover dealing with wwii... ugh.InkL0sed wrote:I'd go with Lincoln first off. I don't think anybody else could have possibly managed the Civil War as well as he did. FDR comes in a close second.
to be honest though both lincoln and roosevelt made some pretty serious violations of the constitution. FDR moreso than Lincoln, I think, but neither was a saint by any means. they used government more as a tool than served it as a venerated institution.
did you just pull presidents' names out of a hat or somethingJJM wrote:My top 15 List would be
1. Teddy Roosevelt
2. Lincoln or Coolidge
3. Lincoln or Coolidge
4. Truman or Reagen
5. Truman or Reagen
6. Taylor or Jefferson
7. Taylor or Jefferson
8. James Madison
9. Benjamin Harrison
10. Cleveland
11. G. W. Bush
12. Eisenhower
13. G. H. W. Bush
14. Wasington
15. McKinley
Nope. Ask me about any one of them and I will give you an answer.SultanOfSurreal wrote:did you just pull presidents' names out of a hat or somethingJJM wrote:My top 15 List would be
1. Teddy Roosevelt
2. Lincoln or Coolidge
3. Lincoln or Coolidge
4. Truman or Reagen
5. Truman or Reagen
6. Taylor or Jefferson
7. Taylor or Jefferson
8. James Madison
9. Benjamin Harrison
10. Cleveland
11. G. W. Bush
12. Eisenhower
13. G. H. W. Bush
14. Wasington
15. McKinley
arguably? more like is.InkL0sed wrote:And seriously, Coolidge is second or third? That just makes no sense. He's arguably just as bad as Hoover.
Ok. Facts are facts and under Coolidge we had a record high economic groth rate of over 7% a year. Many argue he is awful because he left us 16 trillion dollars in dedt but when he took office we were 23 trillion dollars in dedt so he took us 7 trillion dollars out of dedt in 6 years. He also signed the Indian Citizenship act and the thing that I admire most about him is the way he delt with the Boston police strike when he was Govoner of Massachutess.InkL0sed wrote:And seriously, Coolidge is second or third? That just makes no sense. He's arguably just as bad as Hoover.
Benjamin Harrison was deeply honest. He was probably one of the most honest presidents we have ever had. He also made a smart decission signing the Mckinly Tariff.SultanOfSurreal wrote:arguably? more like is.InkL0sed wrote:And seriously, Coolidge is second or third? That just makes no sense. He's arguably just as bad as Hoover.
so jjm, what's so great about benjamin harrison?
if honesty makes a good president then you'd better put Jimmy Carter in the top slotJJM wrote:Benjamin Harrison was deeply honest. He was probably one of the most honest presidents we have ever had. He also made a smart decission signing the Mckinly Tariff.SultanOfSurreal wrote:arguably? more like is.InkL0sed wrote:And seriously, Coolidge is second or third? That just makes no sense. He's arguably just as bad as Hoover.
so jjm, what's so great about benjamin harrison?
Carter=honest just about half a year ago he endorsed a crook? And under his administration Inflation was very high.SultanOfSurreal wrote:if honesty makes a good president then you'd better put Jimmy Carter in the top slotJJM wrote:Benjamin Harrison was deeply honest. He was probably one of the most honest presidents we have ever had. He also made a smart decission signing the Mckinly Tariff.SultanOfSurreal wrote:arguably? more like is.InkL0sed wrote:And seriously, Coolidge is second or third? That just makes no sense. He's arguably just as bad as Hoover.
so jjm, what's so great about benjamin harrison?
the whole of B. harrison's tenure from what i have learned (which is admittedly not a whole lot) is that it was mediocre at best, inept at worst
yes blame carter for the scarcity of natural resources when opec went on strike. meanwhile reagan's voodoo economics saved america, right?JJM wrote: Carter=honest just about half a year ago he endorsed a crook. And under his administration Inflation was very high.
Reagen handeld the Airport workers strike tremendously well. His Economics were smart to.SultanOfSurreal wrote:yes blame carter for the scarcity of natural resources when opec went on strike. meanwhile reagan's voodoo economics saved america, right?JJM wrote: Carter=honest just about half a year ago he endorsed a crook. And under his administration Inflation was very high.
PS seriously loling at the 4 votes for reagan here. 2 more and he'll overtake lincoln. god this place is full of idiots