Yet more dice observations

[hoytdwow]

1. Dice are consistently bad on Peloponnesian War and Imperium Romanum
2. They are consistently good/better on Feudal War
3. Dice behave differently in 3 v 3 rolls than in other situations. Even without using Auto Assault, nearly all
3 v 3 battles are lost.

discuss

[Hoots]

For number 3 do you mean 3 on each territory or 3 attackers vs 3?

4 vs 3 (3 attackers) = 52% win
3 vs 3 (2 attackers) = 20% win

approx

[hoytdwow]

For number 3 do you mean 3 on each territory or 3 attackers vs 3?

4 vs 3 (3 attackers) = 52% win
3 vs 3 (2 attackers) = 20% win

approx

good point. Let me clarify:

I mean 3 attackers vs. 3 defenders. What I mean by these battles are usually lost is that, on the first roll, I have observed that you usually instantly lose 2 guys. As in, the defender wins with both dice.

[ronsizzle]

THE DICE ON CC IN THE LAST WEEK HAVE BEEN FUCKING AWFUL

[sherkaner]

THE DICE ON CC IN THE LAST WEEK HAVE BEEN FUCKING AWFUL

awful for your opponents, or awful for you (or both)?

[targetman377]

i have been having good luck

[Qwert]

1. Dice are consistently bad on Peloponnesian War and Imperium Romanum

[obliterationX]

2. They are consistently good/better on Feudal War

No.

Just no.

[slowreactor]

1. Dice are consistently bad on Peloponnesian War and Imperium Romanum

Owned!

[Titanic]

2. They are consistently good/better on Feudal War

Maybe because 90% of the moves are when its 25v1, so you're not really going to take note of a few bad rolls here and there?