Moderator: Community Team
Sultan is "interesting"...though not necessarily in the most positive use of the word. I think I've gotta go with thegreekdog though.Phatscotty wrote:Based on replies to a topic(thread creation), the interest level generated, and recent activity. Went by those threads which generated a lot of replies/views, generally 100/1000, although I did include many who had a very high reply/view ratio.
what are your interesting threads? I have not seen any recently, and if they got a lot of attention I would have seen them.Army of GOD wrote:I'm appalled for not being on the list!
BOOORINGGGGArmy of GOD wrote:I'm appalled for not being on the list!
HAHAHA!!!!Army of GOD wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 8&t=111604
You're not going to win any points by being the class rebel. Nice try though.khazalid wrote:you're all a bunch of brown-nosed wankers.
Doesnt that reset the vote count tho?Army of GOD wrote:Scotty, you have room for one more.
Just do it. You know you want to.
I've decided that I'm locked into a battle of wills. Ordinarily I would have already resorted to the name calling. I don't know what went wrong this time around.Symmetry wrote:Yay, I'm top of the list, but seriously, thegreekdog is the poster I most respect out of all those listed. Consistently against what I believe in, but thorough and fair in the way that he presents his views. So he gets my vote.
Other than that:
Sultan of Surreal: I don't agree with all his views, but the way he presents them are just genius. I appreciate a poster with a gift for language.
Phatscotty: When in non-troll mode, you are a sharp thinker. It's a shame, as well as weakness on my part, that I never know if I'm getting the man or the troll. Interesting nonetheless.
Some that you left out:
Neoteny: Got to love the thorough and methodical approach on the Evidence for God thread. I expect his patience will break, but I like the fact that he can pick apart a mess of an argument where I would just get frustrated.
John9Blue: Another conservative poster who I find a clear thinker, and a challenge to argue with.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
is that supposed to be a slight?Symmetry wrote:You're not going to win any points by being the class rebel. Nice try though.khazalid wrote:you're all a bunch of brown-nosed wankers.
It was supposed to be a slight, yes. I'm a little confused- were you really in doubt? I can be more specific next time, but it just seems like I overestimated you. Do you really need confirmation to decide when you've been insulted? Or are you genuinely unsure if you feel upset?khazalid wrote:is that supposed to be a slight?Symmetry wrote:You're not going to win any points by being the class rebel. Nice try though.khazalid wrote:you're all a bunch of brown-nosed wankers.
oh f*ck, i've been rumbled. all i wanted was a little acceptance...
faaaack off.
GabonX wrote:The fact of the matter is that reality does not conform to your sense of political correctness.
SultanOfSurreal wrote:i voted for myself and i'm not ashamed to say it because it is the gospel truth. the rest of you are as stars in the glare of the sun compared to me!
GabonX wrote:The fact of the matter is that reality does not conform to your sense of political correctness.
AS shown in "Least respected poster". Snipping at Snorris heals. That AINT EASY!Imaweasel wrote:SultanOfSurreal wrote:i voted for myself and i'm not ashamed to say it because it is the gospel truth. the rest of you are as stars in the glare of the sun compared to me!
you could vote for yourself if the topics were.
1. Uninformed
2. Irrelevant Topics
3. Most Biased
Sadly, I mostly write in English.khazalid wrote:you can press your face to the wall and write it in shit for me next time. i'll be sure to get the message that way.
May you receive the same bump I suspect I received in the Least Respected threadSymmetry wrote:Yay, I'm top of the list
