Moderator: Cartographers

Also, in the small version, the bridge between N.L and S.L looks pixelated...large version has "Forest of Logoth" while small version has "Logoth Forest". Is this due to space concerns? I fear it could cause some confusion when, for example in team games, if one team member uses large and the other uses small map... If space is a concern, why not make them both "Logoth Forest".


Lets pull out the magnifying glass, shall we?natty_dread wrote:(almost) all coordinates seem to be 1 pixel too high. Raiders' haven, telal are all wrong..

That's not the version I was looking at.Lets pull out the magnifying glass, shall we?





You got in the same trap I did, it seems.natty_dread wrote:Dwarven Strongholds / Gateways
- all connected by underground passages
- Gateways can be assaulted by adjacent regions
- Strongholds can assault adjacent regions


I could change it for: Can one way assault the region they're built in.
This is in the legend, but it is under strongholds only. It makes it a bit unclear if it means both the gateways & strongholds, or strongholds only.Gateways and Strongholds are connected by underground passways.
This in itself is confusing. You get access to the underground passes... but the passes are not territories, so it would be much easier if it was just plainly spelled out: "Gateways & Strongholds are connected by u.g. passages".-You get access to the passways by those Gateways.
This I think is quite clear, but again it implies that the same is not possible from the Gateways... never underestimate the casual player's ability to misunderstand-From the Strongholds you can one-way assault the region they're built in (ex: Damkianna Stronghold one-way assaults Damkianna Region)

How about "can one way assault the region they occupy"‘can one way assault the region they’re built in’
