Moderator: Community Team
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
yes but the fervor within which non-believers speak and the ridicule used implies they must be interested, or else why would they spend to much time following around football fans telling them how stupid football is? everyday? over and over again?Symmetry wrote:My point of view- not supporting a football team, finding the sport boring, and generally finding football fans to be obnoxious does not make you a football fan.
PLAYER57832 wrote:I hope we all become liberal drones.
People talk about lots of things with fervor. Having a strong opinion is different from having a religion.Phatscotty wrote:yes but the fervor within which non-believers speak and the ridicule used implies they must be interested, or else why would they spend to much time following around football fans telling them how stupid football is? everyday? over and over again?Symmetry wrote:My point of view- not supporting a football team, finding the sport boring, and generally finding football fans to be obnoxious does not make you a football fan.
Interesting, and I agree with the decision. Just because someone is an atheist doesn't mean that they no longer have first amendment religious protection to act on their beliefs.DangerBoy wrote:I can't get the pdf file link to open from my computer, but there is a judgment from the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals that says atheism is a religion. At least in the eyes of the law it is recognized as such.
This link is just the straight text, without the nice pdf pages.
http://www.altlaw.org/v1/cases/1136642
b.k. barunt wrote:Then you must be a pseudoatheist. If you were a real atheist Dan Brown would make your nipples hard.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"

This doesn't really answer your question, but one of the best comments I've heard was when someone said that atheism has trouble separating itself from religion because as soon as you start talking about belief you start using a word that is pretty much owned by religious discourse.john9blue wrote:define "atheism" and "religion" so we're all on the same wavelength...
No it could no be seen as an establishment of religion. We are not telling kids there is no God we are telling them nothing about God and allowing them and their families decide that for themselves. And I have never heard of any atheist churches before. A very strange brand of atheist they must be. I wonder what they would worship in service.beezer wrote:At least in the United States, the reason why atheists want to run away from the religious title is because their proactive efforts to remove theistic symbolism and acknowledgment of a Creator from public schools, buildings, and other facilities could itself be seen as an establishment of religion. In order to have the upper hand in the argument, they must avoid having the term religious associated with their worldview.
Of course it is religious, not only due to the court ruling previously cited, but also because there are atheist churches with their own ministers that are recognized as such. There are also atheistic chaplains on some university campuses. It may not be a religion which recognizes a deity, but it is religious in the sense that it's a worldview that is protected.
I have a problem with this argument. Christianity relies on a system of beliefs. It's fair to say that belief in a supernatural power, and not believing in a supernatural power are equally unprovable, but when you associate other beliefs with the belief in a god then I see divergence.Metsfanmax wrote:Strong atheism is just as much a religion as Christianity, because there's as much evidence to support the existence of God as the non-existence of God. However, agnosticism is not a religion.
I've heard a couple of people mention atheist churches now on this thread. I've got to be honest, I've never come across one, and I've lived in quite a few major cities around the world. Is this a new thing? Where are they?PLAYER57832 wrote:It is as much a religion as any other belief. There are atheist "churches", but having a church is not a requirement for a religion. Only a belief.
Now, if you say organized religion.. that is a different story.
It wouldn't surprise me if a few of the more militant atheists set one up as a protest (I really hate the term militant atheist). But it's definitely a leap to suggest that atheists have their own churches.alan.duanmu wrote:Same here symmetry, never heard of one
jonesthecurl wrote:Please tell us more about atheist churches, I am puzzled by the concept.
Really?alan.duanmu wrote:No atheist goes to atheist service at the atheist church and has special atheist dinner during the atheist month of fasting in celebration of athiesm or anything of that sort.
