Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Definitely sounds like frustration with 3-player standoffs that leads you to make such claims without merit.uckuki wrote:it's frustration.


I did, in fact, take a turn for Ishi when phantom (who was sitting for Ishi) asked me to take the turn for him in this game because Ishi was his opponent and it wouldn't be appropriate for phantom to play his turn.... The point being that's not something a player involved in secret diplomacy with his clanmate would bother with... He'd just take Ishi's turn for him and attack the accuser who amazingly has survived 19 rounds despite being double-teamed by the 'Goon squad.Barney Rubble wrote:I do have to agree with him about Mudpuppys comment and their objectivity as he did take turns in this game for one of the accused .
BR
You can see a lot more of the board than I can, uckuki, but I think to anyone (even "objective" observers) looking through the fog, red is far from dead. It appears to me he is in the lead. Yet you conclude his move to weaken your stack was a suicide?!?!uckuki wrote:2012-05-17 08:36:10 - uckuki: they can argue that they hit me for the last few rounds to keep or take bonuses or whatever bullshit reason they can come up with, but red needs to explain why he suicided into my stack fully knowing that he can't kill me (took 82 stack down to 47) except
2012-05-17 08:36:22 - uckuki: for the purpose of delivering me to blue.
Your call, Ishi.... but I would not let this guy's paranoid accusations tempt you into revealing your strategy in a game that seems very much alive. I'd recommend sending it to BG privately tomorrow and then wait 'til after the game is decided before 'splaining it to your opponent. No need to reward his bogus C&A claim and insults by divulging your strategy to him.Ishihara wrote:I take this issue very seriously, and I will be more than happy to explain why, in the course of my last turn, I hit your large stack and knocked it in half (as well as my general strategy the last few turns). I'm working tonight, so you will see the defense of my turn by noon tomorrow (5/18).


You seem to have done exactly the same.MudPuppy wrote:I know I won't convince you since you've already made your mind up about my clanmates....
MP
Yeah, perhaps I have done the same... I don't "know" that he's made up his mind... but it certainly sounds like it to me. Uckuki appears to be making few attempts to look at the situation from other viewpoints as I have attempted to do so from his... though I admit I was unsuccessful in that effort.Lindax wrote:You seem to have done exactly the same.MudPuppy wrote:I know I won't convince you since you've already made your mind up about my clanmates....
MP![]()
Let's not forget that uckuki is a very decent and honorable player too. Whether he's right or not, I don't think he would post a complaint here frivolously.
If it turns out he's wrong and you're right, maybe frustration did indeed get the better of him, who knows. No reason to have a bunch of fellow clan members come in here and stamp him down in the mud.![]()
The report is posted here now, let the C&A guys figure it out. If it's their issue to figure out, it may still come down to the Tournament Department.
Lx
So he has to keep an open mind about their innocence because his conclusion is incorrect, yet you don't have to keep an open mind about their guilt because your conclusion is clearly correct?MudPuppy wrote:Yeah, perhaps I have done the same... I don't "know" that he's made up his mind... but it certainly sounds like it to me. Uckuki appears to be making few attempts to look at the situation from other viewpoints as I have attempted to do so from his... though I admit I was unsuccessful in that effort.
I had an open enough mind to look at the game to see if it could be perceived as cheating... but having played alongside and spoken with Ishi & phantom for quite some time, I would have been extremely surprised to have seen evidence of cheating. However, if the evidence were there, I wouldn't turn my back on it.Night Strike wrote:So he has to keep an open mind about their innocence because his conclusion is incorrect, yet you don't have to keep an open mind about their guilt because your conclusion is clearly correct?MudPuppy wrote:Yeah, perhaps I have done the same... I don't "know" that he's made up his mind... but it certainly sounds like it to me. Uckuki appears to be making few attempts to look at the situation from other viewpoints as I have attempted to do so from his... though I admit I was unsuccessful in that effort.
Why do you continue to insist I don't have an open mind. Yes, it is in the realm of possibility that they cheated. Having known them as well as anyone can know each other on CC, I find it highly improbable that they did cheat... that's just not their style. But I tried to look at the evidence for signs of cheating.... I saw none. I stated, if I had seen evidence of cheating, I wouldn't ignore it. I just didn't see it. Please show me the evidence of their guilt that you claim I have closed my mind to... perhaps you can enlighten me.Night Strike wrote:Actually, I haven't decided either way on this case. However, you're demanding that uckuki have an open mind about their innocence yet you don't have an open mind about their guilt. He looked at what happened as being secret diplomacy/throwing a game and you looked at what happened as legitimate. Why does he have to have an open mind but you don't? You can be confident that the C&A team will rule the way you see things, but why is uckuki not allowed to be confident that they will rule the way he sees it?

uckuki wrote:to correct Mud: ...I did not call them stupid
True... you can't accuse someone of cheating without accusing them of cheating... but you can word it more like "their actions appear suspicious and I'd like it investigated." Anyway, I much more appreciate the tone of uckuki's last post than his former ones. I'm more than happy to offer my apologies to uckuki if anything I may have said was over the top and I'll certainly apologize to uckuki if the accused are found guilty.uckuki wrote:he's stupid and his friend wins because of that.


To be clear as well: I didn't say that you did.MudPuppy wrote:To be clear, I didn't "have a bunch of fellow clan members come in here and stamp him down in the mud." I have yet to speak to any of my clanmates (including the accused) about this C&A report...
MP
I know... just clarifying in case anyone got the impression there was some kind of organized "rally around Ishi & phantom" effort in our clan... which I have seen occur in C&A from time to time. I just noticed their names in the thread and had a look... and really it was only NV & I (unless you are including the accused) who posted. I'm not sure two 'Goons qualifies as a "bunch."Lindax wrote:To be clear as well: I didn't say that you did.MudPuppy wrote:To be clear, I didn't "have a bunch of fellow clan members come in here and stamp him down in the mud." I have yet to speak to any of my clanmates (including the accused) about this C&A report...
MP
I was speaking in the general sense that they came in here, not that you made them do that.![]()
Lx
