Moderator: Community Team
this onenietzsche wrote:"While my guitar gently sweeps"
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
no, no, I didnt write sweeps.saxitoxin wrote:this onenietzsche wrote:"While my guitar gently sweeps"
The sad thing is the beatles are overrated.nietzsche wrote:inb4 aog says "the sad thing is the beatles are overrated"

Make a poll? Come on, Let It Be!nietzsche wrote:I thought we could suggest some and then make a poll.

"Yellow Submarine", unquestionably.nietzsche wrote:What is your favourite The Beatles song?
I thought we could suggest some and then make a poll.
I like "I saw her standing there", "While my guitar gently weeps", "A day in the life" among others.
Scott - the Federal Reserve are using Rebecca Black to taunt you.Phatscotty wrote:Revolution
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:While My Guitar Gently Weeps is the only song written by them I like. I still maintain that the Jeff Healey version is far superior, though.
I do like their rendition of Twist and Shout, too. But that's about it.
-TG
f*ck. Good inb4.nietzsche wrote:inb4 aog says "the sad thing is the beatles are overrated"
And pop music can't possibly be good?Army of GOD wrote:They're nothing but pop music.
It can be good, but only if we're in the 80s.Woodruff wrote:And pop music can't possibly be good?Army of GOD wrote:They're nothing but pop music.
But they created. They created a lot of music.Army of GOD wrote:It can be good, but only if we're in the 80s.Woodruff wrote:And pop music can't possibly be good?Army of GOD wrote:They're nothing but pop music.
I just think they're severely over-rated. Harrison was an average guitarist and most of their song-writing was nothing more than teenybopper food.
Ok, so I admit I'm just pissed that most people consider them to be a better band than Queen, which in my opinion is no contest, but whatevski.
Who cares if they created a lot of music? U2 created a lot of music and they still only have one good song (Sunday Bloody Sunday, though Bono tries his hardest to ruin it). I just can't stand the cult following they have. From a purely artistic appreciation standpoint, I think they're shit. Their songs are catchy, yea, but in the same way LMFAO's songs are catchy.nietzsche wrote:But they created. They created a lot of music.Army of GOD wrote:It can be good, but only if we're in the 80s.Woodruff wrote:And pop music can't possibly be good?Army of GOD wrote:They're nothing but pop music.
I just think they're severely over-rated. Harrison was an average guitarist and most of their song-writing was nothing more than teenybopper food.
Ok, so I admit I'm just pissed that most people consider them to be a better band than Queen, which in my opinion is no contest, but whatevski.
Most likely the guys you admire only go deep in their troubled selfs and write in the best way they can allegoric messages.
There's room for everyone, Pop music only means popular and what if you can create something that appeals like everyone? Is sex bad? because everybody likes sex.
It's way too different the pop music of the beatles than the pop music of the backstreet boys.
We've been thru this AoG, you dislike everything.
Meh. They were in the right place at the right time and had appeal because they were nice, polite Englishmen. There music and talent was mediocre.nietzsche wrote:But they created. They created a lot of music.