Moderator: Clan Directors

hmm,i dont understand why you point this ? did i dont say that this its unoficial,, and you just can not wait ,and first what you post its that CD will decide and award MVP, like people dont know that.Keefie wrote:You're very correct, it's not official.
The CD's will be awarding the CL5 MVP awards.
ofcourse i dont forget our conversation,, but like i say,, how they treat me , when i ask and want to talk to arrange MVP (when i was organiser), and when they not reply and ignore,, then in end why i have any obligation to work with them?and please do not forget our PM conversations. I was virtually begging you to handover your MVP calculations and you plainly refused both myself and Leehar. Remember, your answer was always - I QUIT CL5.

You quit CL5 Qwert, this is not your business anymore mate.Qwert wrote:hmm,i dont understand why you point this ? did i dont say that this its unoficial,, and you just can not wait ,and first what you post its that CD will decide and award MVP, like people dont know that.Keefie wrote:You're very correct, it's not official.
The CD's will be awarding the CL5 MVP awards.

thank you,,finally some normal behavior.chemefreak wrote:We will be announcing MVPs according to our own criteria. Both as CDs and as TOs. If you disagree with our selections, it is your prerogative to disagree.
You are very welcome.Qwert wrote:thank you,,finally some normal behavior.chemefreak wrote:We will be announcing MVPs according to our own criteria. Both as CDs and as TOs. If you disagree with our selections, it is your prerogative to disagree.

if this was reaction in first place,, we will not have all this conversation at all.chemefreak wrote:You are very welcome.Qwert wrote:thank you,,finally some normal behavior.chemefreak wrote:We will be announcing MVPs according to our own criteria. Both as CDs and as TOs. If you disagree with our selections, it is your prerogative to disagree.

As I said in my PM to you, the thread was being locked temporarily while I discussed it with the other CD's.Qwert wrote:thank you,,finally some normal behavior.chemefreak wrote:We will be announcing MVPs according to our own criteria. Both as CDs and as TOs. If you disagree with our selections, it is your prerogative to disagree.
Qwert likes to stroke himself in public? Still awaiting a response to my last pm qwert. Hugs and kisses Uncle Bogangreenoaks wrote:what is the purpose of an unofficial mvp when there is an official mvp?

You are awesome! Qwert's formula rewards you for playing in 48 games, which was 5th most in the league. You also eliminated 48 players, which is heavily weighted in Qwert's formula. Very impressive.pearljamrox2 wrote:How did you come up with the numbers? Just curious, it seems the MVP was 15th ranked, and 3rd ranked from his clan. Also, my number is really high. Am I awesome or something?

34 games and 26 wins is impressive, well done Thelordchemefreak wrote: Thelord 34 26 8 0 0 21 76%

cheme,can i ask you what are you doing? Are you intentional provoke?chemefreak wrote:You are awesome! Qwert's formula rewards you for playing in 48 games, which was 5th most in the league. You also eliminated 48 players, which is heavily weighted in Qwert's formula. Very impressive.pearljamrox2 wrote:How did you come up with the numbers? Just curious, it seems the MVP was 15th ranked, and 3rd ranked from his clan. Also, my number is really high. Am I awesome or something?
Good example:
Here are the stat lines for two players from AQOH. thelord played in 4 more games than kgb, but won 8 more. However, since he had 4 less KILLS he is several places behind. The formula puts WAY TOO much emphasis on kills. Honestly, had Qwert not quit, we would not have used this formula to award an MVP anyways.
Kgbpizza 30 18 12 0 0 25 60%
Thelord 34 26 8 0 0 21 76%
what is the purpose of an unofficial mvp when there is an official mvp?Qwert wrote:cheme,can i ask you what are you doing? Are you intentional provoke?chemefreak wrote:You are awesome! Qwert's formula rewards you for playing in 48 games, which was 5th most in the league. You also eliminated 48 players, which is heavily weighted in Qwert's formula. Very impressive.pearljamrox2 wrote:How did you come up with the numbers? Just curious, it seems the MVP was 15th ranked, and 3rd ranked from his clan. Also, my number is really high. Am I awesome or something?
Good example:
Here are the stat lines for two players from AQOH. thelord played in 4 more games than kgb, but won 8 more. However, since he had 4 less KILLS he is several places behind. The formula puts WAY TOO much emphasis on kills. Honestly, had Qwert not quit, we would not have used this formula to award an MVP anyways.
Kgbpizza 30 18 12 0 0 25 60%
Thelord 34 26 8 0 0 21 76%
I dont will go low on your lvl,and comment your work in CL5,, and also dont comment how you decide mvp,, and i will not comment anything here, i will just update first post,, and you can continue to be hostile and unpleasant person.
Everything what i do, you attacking, like im you kill all your families, and you want some revenge or what.
Just when i though that you become normal,you start again to provoke. I dont know what are you want to achive.
On any questions i will not comment, just will update first post,and finished with clans.

This!Armandolas wrote:Rewarding kills in teamgames make no sense what so ever
How on earth was that hostile? You can find plenty of examples of cheme being hostile, this is definitely not one of them. For someone provoking, maybe you should read the first sentence of the thread where you seemingly attempt to call out the CD's after you quit:Qwert wrote:cheme,can i ask you what are you doing? Are you intentional provoke?chemefreak wrote:You are awesome! Qwert's formula rewards you for playing in 48 games, which was 5th most in the league. You also eliminated 48 players, which is heavily weighted in Qwert's formula. Very impressive.pearljamrox2 wrote:How did you come up with the numbers? Just curious, it seems the MVP was 15th ranked, and 3rd ranked from his clan. Also, my number is really high. Am I awesome or something?
Good example:
Here are the stat lines for two players from AQOH. thelord played in 4 more games than kgb, but won 8 more. However, since he had 4 less KILLS he is several places behind. The formula puts WAY TOO much emphasis on kills. Honestly, had Qwert not quit, we would not have used this formula to award an MVP anyways.
Kgbpizza 30 18 12 0 0 25 60%
Thelord 34 26 8 0 0 21 76%
I dont will go low on your lvl,and comment your work in CL5,, and also dont comment how you decide mvp,, and i will not comment anything here, i will just update first post,, and you can continue to be hostile and unpleasant person.
Everything what i do, you attacking, like im you kill all your families, and you want some revenge or what.
Just when i though that you become normal,you start again to provoke. I dont know what are you want to achive.
On any questions i will not comment, just will update first post,and finished with clans.
Qwert wrote:This its something what i was working ,when i was Organiser of CL5, even in few newsletter its was post MVP standing, and when i was withdraw this stop to be posted, and even when i try to talk abouth this with CD,, unfortunatly never get reply,,and because this never become official approve, then its will be unofficial TOp 20 for each League.
Exactly. It makes even less sense when you think about maps where teams achieved objectives instead of killing to win.Shannon Apple wrote:This!Armandolas wrote:Rewarding kills in teamgames make no sense what so ever
chemefreak wrote:You are awesome! Qwert's formula rewards you for playing in 48 games, which was 5th most in the league. You also eliminated 48 players, which is heavily weighted in Qwert's formula. Very impressive.pearljamrox2 wrote:How did you come up with the numbers? Just curious, it seems the MVP was 15th ranked, and 3rd ranked from his clan. Also, my number is really high. Am I awesome or something?
Good example:
Here are the stat lines for two players from AQOH. thelord played in 4 more games than kgb, but won 8 more. However, since he had 4 less KILLS he is several places behind. The formula puts WAY TOO much emphasis on kills. Honestly, had Qwert not quit, we would not have used this formula to award an MVP anyways.
Kgbpizza 30 18 12 0 0 25 60%
Thelord 34 26 8 0 0 21 76%
I would. "Kills" is a 100% totally useless, meaningless, misleading statistic in team games.pearljamrox2 wrote: I wouldn't totally knock kills.
haha, whatthe? No one has "notoriously unreliable" dice. The dice are random. Some people tend to be whiny complainypants about their dice a lot more than others, but unless you can show me someone with non-standard dice stats I will never believe that statement.pearljamrox2 wrote:Sure, there is luck, and circumstance in play. I will happily set up a team mate for a kill if it's the best plan. I don't purposely try to rack up kills but it's not really a coincidence either. I kill a lot of people I play against. I lot of times I wind up being the tip of the spear. I have some good teammates, some with notoriously unreliable dice,
Firstly, congratulations on your record in the CL5. Well done!pearljamrox2 wrote: or that just have a knack for setting someone else up. I have other good teammates like myself, who are aggressive, but will always look it over to see if there is something better for someone else. I typically tend to be more the aggressive type. I am also very deliberate, so on the big complicated moves...I dont make mistakes. I finish. It's just a fact. I kill! Obviously, getting the win is most important. You need all members to play well to get the win. If you are gonna look at MVP, an individual award, you might look away from a team achievement like a win, and look more at kills. Sure, if someone has 2 or 3 more kills, not much different, little luck here or there it could be different. Now if you have someone who scores TWICE the kills as the other guy...then you are looking at someone who had their way a lot more often.

Okay, I laughed.khazalid wrote:also, he seems to like pearl jam. so like. y'know...