Moderator: Community Team
mrswdk wrote: I also saw a story about a girl who got knocked off her bike on a remote road in a hit-and-run accident, and in the following two hours was ignored by 30-40 passing vehicles (of which 5 ran straight over her, so we can be damn sure they knew she was there). The person who eventually called an ambulance didn't stick around to wait for it either.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"

I'm not sure if the person who finally moved the mutilated child was the one who called the ambulance as well, but I heard the lady who finally acted got a cash reward from the government, to try to encourage other people to be more respectful of life.Metsfanmax wrote:mrswdk wrote: I also saw a story about a girl who got knocked off her bike on a remote road in a hit-and-run accident, and in the following two hours was ignored by 30-40 passing vehicles (of which 5 ran straight over her, so we can be damn sure they knew she was there). The person who eventually called an ambulance didn't stick around to wait for it either.
Phatscotty wrote:I'm not sure if the person who finally moved the mutilated child was the one who called the ambulance as well, but I heard the lady who finally acted got a cash reward from the government, to try to encourage other people to be more respectful of life.Metsfanmax wrote:mrswdk wrote: I also saw a story about a girl who got knocked off her bike on a remote road in a hit-and-run accident, and in the following two hours was ignored by 30-40 passing vehicles (of which 5 ran straight over her, so we can be damn sure they knew she was there). The person who eventually called an ambulance didn't stick around to wait for it either.
Maybe yall could introduce a dose of Jesus? Cuz right now this is sounding similar to the emptiness in our public education system.


What happens in China sounds similar to the emptiness in our charitable donations. Billions of people in developing nations suffer from poverty, hunger and disease, and Western nations give a pittance in foreign aid and charitable donations targeted at these problems (relative to their own wealth). The people who walked by that poor girl are not substantially different from the Western nations that do very little in the face of suffering in other nations when they could do so at relatively little cost.Phatscotty wrote:I'm not sure if the person who finally moved the mutilated child was the one who called the ambulance as well, but I heard the lady who finally acted got a cash reward from the government, to try to encourage other people to be more respectful of life.Metsfanmax wrote:mrswdk wrote: I also saw a story about a girl who got knocked off her bike on a remote road in a hit-and-run accident, and in the following two hours was ignored by 30-40 passing vehicles (of which 5 ran straight over her, so we can be damn sure they knew she was there). The person who eventually called an ambulance didn't stick around to wait for it either.
Maybe yall could introduce a dose of Jesus? Cuz right now this is sounding similar to the emptiness in our public education system.
Significantly. Could you drive a truck over the feet of or even merely ride a motorbike past a child that had been run over. Even people in North America that think Confucius is a greater teacher than the other guy have too much compassion in their hearts to act like those in met's video. Though we're catching up I suspect.notyou2 wrote:Is Jesus loving America more tolerant and compassionate than heathen China?
Now I know you're a good person notyou2 even if you might not drop a loonie into the unicef abortion funding box. I bet if you watched that video of the kid being run over you cringed when the guy hit the gas and ran over it the second time with the back wheels, because there is a huge difference between that and not tithing to church or state.Metsfanmax wrote: What happens in China sounds similar to the emptiness in our charitable donations. Billions of people in developing nations suffer from poverty, hunger and disease, and Western nations give a pittance in foreign aid and charitable donations targeted at these problems (relative to their own wealth). The people who walked by that poor girl are not substantially different from the Western nations that do very little in the face of suffering in other nations when they could do so at relatively little cost.
You really think that huh. Let's go there. You send your money over to China to help the image in your head of a person laying in the dust dying of starvation, nobody cares, people walk over them as they starve. So, the money and aid that you sent, where do you think it goes first? Certainly you don't think a drone is gonna drop a plate of rice and some American dollars on top of the starving person? Because really I think that's what you want to happen and you just want to throw other people's money at the idea. But you don't pay any mind to the real world, and where that money is going to really end up. If you had some control over the Chinese government, or hung Phat owes you a personal favor, then maybe there's a chance.Metsfanmax wrote:What happens in China sounds similar to the emptiness in our charitable donations. Billions of people in developing nations suffer from poverty, hunger and disease, and Western nations give a pittance in foreign aid and charitable donations targeted at these problems (relative to their own wealth). The people who walked by that poor girl are not substantially different from the Western nations that do very little in the face of suffering in other nations when they could do so at relatively little cost.Phatscotty wrote:I'm not sure if the person who finally moved the mutilated child was the one who called the ambulance as well, but I heard the lady who finally acted got a cash reward from the government, to try to encourage other people to be more respectful of life.Metsfanmax wrote:mrswdk wrote: I also saw a story about a girl who got knocked off her bike on a remote road in a hit-and-run accident, and in the following two hours was ignored by 30-40 passing vehicles (of which 5 ran straight over her, so we can be damn sure they knew she was there). The person who eventually called an ambulance didn't stick around to wait for it either.
Maybe yall could introduce a dose of Jesus? Cuz right now this is sounding similar to the emptiness in our public education system.
Drop it in any red bucket, and I will see to it that Chinese airspace is violated.2dimes wrote:I would like to donate twenty dollars to your charity.Phatscotty wrote: a drone is gonna drop a plate of rice and some American dollars on top of the starving person?

Do you actually have data to support the claim that charitable donations never actually help individuals in African nations, or are you just talking out of your ass? If you'd really like to get into this, I can provide you with a ton of links demonstrating the opposite. But I'm not convinced it's worth my time, because you'll find some sentence in one of them saying that there were a few instances where distributions went wrong and conclude that it therefore never works.Phatscotty wrote:I know what you mean Mets, don't get me wrong. Nobody wants people to starve anywhere, well, maybe some people want Conservatives to starve, but anyways, you send your money to Africa to help a starving person, but really you are stuffing Koni's pocket, or whichever tinpot dictator is on the top of the hill at the moment.
They just aren't going to let that money, in their perspective, be 'wasted' on an old starving person when they have soldiers risking their life who are hungry too.
You're using the fact that some charitable efforts may be inhibited by corrupt governments as a justification for not giving any money to charitable efforts in Africa, it seems, which is why I used 'never'. But you also have an obsolete idea of what charitable donations can mean in 2013. One of the most effective charities out there is GiveDirectly. This organization takes cash that you give them, and gives it directly to African individuals through a cell phone app, basically. There's no government involvement in that process. Would you be willing to donate to that effort?Phatscotty wrote:I'm pretty sure there have been individuals who have been helped by charitable donations, probably millions. Even a few dictators too. Are you really asking me for a source of African leaders who have stolen money, aid, supplies, shelters? Or is it only Republican presidents in America who do that hehe
'never' is your word. Perhaps there is no corruption at all in Africa, yes, hungry armies just let the aid land on their air strips, and they let the food pass through their hands and hand it to the weakest amongst the people (cuz you know that's how humans are, they always treat the poorest and sickest and ugliest and most hungry the nicest and make sure they are first in line!)
...and the leaders don't even take a cut! You want a source? Yeah, they had an African scribe right there, watching it all go down, writing every word spoken and recording every pound pilfered, so that the truth of their actions can be released for all to see! Cuz that's how humans are
So, would you support GiveDirectly, since it bypasses that and doesn't need a stable government to deliver impacts?Phatscotty wrote:well, to put it another way, the more stable a country is, the more infrastructure etc, the more aid will reach the intended targets, in general.
I said that we collectively have a lot of wealth and developing nations have very little wealth, and we are giving very little of that to those developing nations. On an individual level, we should feel morally culpable that we're not giving more to individuals in other countries that don't have nearly as much wealth as we do. Whether or not that translates into effective foreign policy at the federal level is a different issue.But what you said that got me involved here was about 'how simple and cheap it would be to just feed everyone in the world'.
That's probably the best way.Metsfanmax wrote:You're using the fact that some charitable efforts may be inhibited by corrupt governments as a justification for not giving any money to charitable efforts in Africa, it seems, which is why I used 'never'. But you also have an obsolete idea of what charitable donations can mean in 2013. One of the most effective charities out there is GiveDirectly. This organization takes cash that you give them, and gives it directly to African individuals through a cell phone app, basically. There's no government involvement in that process. Would you be willing to donate to that effort?Phatscotty wrote:I'm pretty sure there have been individuals who have been helped by charitable donations, probably millions. Even a few dictators too. Are you really asking me for a source of African leaders who have stolen money, aid, supplies, shelters? Or is it only Republican presidents in America who do that hehe
'never' is your word. Perhaps there is no corruption at all in Africa, yes, hungry armies just let the aid land on their air strips, and they let the food pass through their hands and hand it to the weakest amongst the people (cuz you know that's how humans are, they always treat the poorest and sickest and ugliest and most hungry the nicest and make sure they are first in line!)
...and the leaders don't even take a cut! You want a source? Yeah, they had an African scribe right there, watching it all go down, writing every word spoken and recording every pound pilfered, so that the truth of their actions can be released for all to see! Cuz that's how humans are