Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I assume you mean virus? What does the underlined mean? If I am understanding you correctly, your theory is ok, but its pretty high risk. The safest option for town right now is to not lynch, however in this case less risk = less reward.kgb007 wrote:well you all should know where i stand on new guy..
why not turn Loot loose tonight? kill two birds with one stone if he follows through on his scum and clears himself at the same time
in theory if everything breaks right, we correctly lynch scum today and loot takes down another one in the night phase and we'd have the advantage heading into the next day
I still don't really get it. Scum target? Don't you just mean target? they aren't guaranteed to be scum... (which is one of the main problems with your idea).kgb007 wrote:follows through on his scum target* and clears himself at the same time
I disagree with letting virus call his shot. If he's mafia, he gets a free hit on a town player and we still might believe him.kgb007 wrote:sorry i got virus and Loot's roles mixed up, if we can correctly lynch scum today and virus is actually a vig, we could test virus' claim/clear himself if he names his target today and is successful with his kill during the night, a cherry on top would be that he guess correctly during the night phase and kills mafia
i'd like to believe saf is town since he cleared since i KNOW i'm town but he could technically still be scum and by "clearing" me actually draw me as a target
I'd be for a lynch of virus, I can't see a one-shot town vig. A regular vig would make more sense in a NV game. Not sure who else we would go after besides him.Anarkistsdream wrote:I trust loot and nag. There are three votes... now, we only need two more to lynch... I think that newguy has proven himself to be inactive in the last three or four games he has signed up for. So, I can reason that he bailed on this too, and so has not been sending in moves.... we skip him either way. Safariguy cleared kgb, so they are either both scum or both town... You all keep saying we need to just trust that... That leaves Virus, Neb and.... who else? I am on my phone at the dentist right now... Either saf and kgb are the scum or there is another group, so we either test it by lynching kgb and seeing how he flips, or saf, loot, kgb, nag and myself vote another group of two, as we already have the majority.


I'd rather lynch someone like new guy who has posted 7 times in a month. We all have a real life and it's an easy excuse to hide behind if you're mafia. I can believe virus as a vig , it make senses that he hasn't used it yet and an odd detail for scum to claim as part of their rolesafariguy5 wrote:I'd be for a lynch of virus, I can't see a one-shot town vig. A regular vig would make more sense in a NV game. Not sure who else we would go after besides him.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
This is true, but his disappearance did not stop the kills, so he is mot the one we need to worry about... Know what I mean?Lootifer wrote:Wheres our Mod? I can't really see us progressing until we replace new guy to be honest - he has been prodded remember so lets move with a replacement.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Quote for truth. We have someone waiting to replace hereLootifer wrote:Wheres our Mod? I can't really see us progressing until we replace new guy to be honest - he has been prodded remember so lets move with a replacement.

You're reading too much into this. Loot picked new guy, as soon as new guy is replaced before reading up his replacement should claim or I will vote him as well. Sorry to the replacement but we gotta play hardball on this one, claim and read up later. If you're genuine that shouldn't be too hard to do.kgb007 wrote:My vote stays, I have a hunch and I'm gonna stick to it. Curious that loot and virus are so quick to dismiss voting him.
What happens once he gets replaced virus? The new player will take some time to go through 30 pages and even if they don't read it all, will make some generalized statement that is supposed to do what? Will he have access to new guys night actions for info purposes (assuming he made any)? Seems unlikely at this point since 10 days go by at a time with no post from new guy. Short of a mistake by the replacement, the pressure falls back on virus. I was originally for believing you but it doesn't seem you have the same townie cred with the rest of the players. I don't think no lynch is an option. We NEED to get this day lynch right
I say loot name a new player to claim. we went from mass claiming to stopping after 3 claims. Maybe loot knew what he was doing by suggesting new guy go next.

I agree with nag here. Also I still believe a no lynch isn't going to leave us dead in the water. We have time. Just need to be patient.nagerous wrote:You're reading too much into this. Loot picked new guy, as soon as new guy is replaced before reading up his replacement should claim or I will vote him as well. Sorry to the replacement but we gotta play hardball on this one, claim and read up later. If you're genuine that shouldn't be too hard to do.kgb007 wrote:My vote stays, I have a hunch and I'm gonna stick to it. Curious that loot and virus are so quick to dismiss voting him.
What happens once he gets replaced virus? The new player will take some time to go through 30 pages and even if they don't read it all, will make some generalized statement that is supposed to do what? Will he have access to new guys night actions for info purposes (assuming he made any)? Seems unlikely at this point since 10 days go by at a time with no post from new guy. Short of a mistake by the replacement, the pressure falls back on virus. I was originally for believing you but it doesn't seem you have the same townie cred with the rest of the players. I don't think no lynch is an option. We NEED to get this day lynch right
I say loot name a new player to claim. we went from mass claiming to stopping after 3 claims. Maybe loot knew what he was doing by suggesting new guy go next.