Moderator: Community Team
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
That's a false premise, and it invalidates the rest of your post. The murdered teens were just the flashpoint that re-ignited the issue. They are not at the core of it. The real issue is the rocket attacks, which have never ceased. Putting the rocket launching teams out of business is the goal of the current operation.patches70 wrote: Israel justified this attack because of the three teens that were murdered.
Stealing your hubcaps is a crime. 4800 rocket attacks, supplemented with car bombs, suicide bombings, mortar and grenade fire goes way beyond crime. It's war. Furthermore, with the intentional targeting of schools and other targets that provoke an emotional response, it's a war of terror.BigBallinStalin wrote: Okay, if someone committed a crime in my neighborhood, what's the reasonable response?
Hamas has not stopped firing rockets since 2001, so unless they had a time machine, they didn't know they were planning to kidnap some teenagers in 2014.GreecePwns wrote:It is also important to note that Hamas did not start firing some of their more powerful rockets until the Israel started targeting Hamas members for arbitrary arrests and house bombings as a result of this kidnapping incident.
Bullshit. You seem to forget the history, lucky we have it all still.Dukasaur wrote: That's a false premise, and it invalidates the rest of your post. The murdered teens were just the flashpoint that re-ignited the issue. They are not at the core of it. The real issue is the rocket attacks, which have never ceased. Putting the rocket launching teams out of business is the goal of the current operation.
Other Israeli officials-Netanyahu wrote:Hamas is responsible, and Hamas will pay.”
Go ahead, read the article. See how the Israeli's acted when the teens were missing. Read how the Israeli's reacted and find in the article a single reference to rocket attacks by Hamas.Economy Minister Naftali Bennett wrote:There can be no forgiveness for the killers of children and those who sent them. Now is the time to act.”
So do you really wanna keep on with this rocket attack nonsense or finally admit, that in this current case, it started because Israel decided it's ok to rampage through the West Bank killing anyone who got in their way, launch air strikes on the West Bank and Gaza, escalating into a full blown air campaign against Gaza proper?article wrote:In the weeks since the abductions, the Israeli military has conducted one of the largest and most aggressive sweeps in the West Bank in a decade. The fallout has included house searches, raids, arrests and even deaths, igniting new frictions between Israelis and Palestinians, who just three months ago were in the midst of U.S-brokered peace negotiations.
Your hypocrisy is getting increasingly annoying. The entire basis of your criticism of people who support Israel seems to be that they are racist, and yet when I even mention the idea that the Arabs are also capable of doing shitty things, suddenly the race card is unspeakable!saxitoxin wrote:Reading the increasingly not-so-covert racism in this thread I feel like I just stepped into a time machine to the 1920s. A hundred years ago "your seemingly picturesque view of the Arabs" would have read "your seemingly picturesque view of the Negroes." Fortunately the police have machine guns to cow the Arabs (be sure to watch out for the Arabess, however). It would be even better if we could herd them together and safely cage them, don't you agree? But we'd be very humane - we'll throw food into the cage and have doctors look at them sometimes. And we can even let the agreeable ones out provided they first prove they won't try to fly about on their magic carpets and summon djinn.Metsfanmax wrote:Yes, but you made a blanket statement about everyone here who has disagreed with you, and this is not the first time that you've implied that some of us are Israel supporters merely because we don't agree with your seemingly picturesque view of the Arabs.saxitoxin wrote: GFY. I was referring to universalchiro, and the rest of the Israeli nutcases, and their evangelical belief that killing all Arabs will lead to the resurrection of Jesus as you very well know.
Maybe you'll stop and think about what Israel has done. Then perhaps you can arrive at a clearer stance.Dukasaur wrote:That's a false premise, and it invalidates the rest of your post. The murdered teens were just the flashpoint that re-ignited the issue. They are not at the core of it. The real issue is the rocket attacks, which have never ceased. Putting the rocket launching teams out of business is the goal of the current operation.patches70 wrote: Israel justified this attack because of the three teens that were murdered.
Stealing your hubcaps is a crime. 4800 rocket attacks, supplemented with car bombs, suicide bombings, mortar and grenade fire goes way beyond crime. It's war. Furthermore, with the intentional targeting of schools and other targets that provoke an emotional response, it's a war of terror.BigBallinStalin wrote: Okay, if someone committed a crime in my neighborhood, what's the reasonable response?
Hamas has not stopped firing rockets since 2001, so unless they had a time machine, they didn't know they were planning to kidnap some teenagers in 2014.GreecePwns wrote:It is also important to note that Hamas did not start firing some of their more powerful rockets until the Israel started targeting Hamas members for arbitrary arrests and house bombings as a result of this kidnapping incident.
And again. I wonder how many more posts it will be before you start telling us how you think "the blacks" need to stop doing drugs and "the Asians" need to start driving better.Metsfanmax wrote:Your hypocrisy is getting increasingly annoying. The entire basis of your criticism of people who support Israel seems to be that they are racist, and yet when I even mention the idea that the Arabs are also capable of doing shitty things, suddenly the race card is unspeakable!saxitoxin wrote:Reading the increasingly not-so-covert racism in this thread I feel like I just stepped into a time machine to the 1920s. A hundred years ago "your seemingly picturesque view of the Arabs" would have read "your seemingly picturesque view of the Negroes." Fortunately the police have machine guns to cow the Arabs (be sure to watch out for the Arabess, however). It would be even better if we could herd them together and safely cage them, don't you agree? But we'd be very humane - we'll throw food into the cage and have doctors look at them sometimes. And we can even let the agreeable ones out provided they first prove they won't try to fly about on their magic carpets and summon djinn.Metsfanmax wrote:Yes, but you made a blanket statement about everyone here who has disagreed with you, and this is not the first time that you've implied that some of us are Israel supporters merely because we don't agree with your seemingly picturesque view of the Arabs.saxitoxin wrote: GFY. I was referring to universalchiro, and the rest of the Israeli nutcases, and their evangelical belief that killing all Arabs will lead to the resurrection of Jesus as you very well know.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
I agree with 50% of your statement.oVo wrote:I find the leaders on both sides of this ongoing conflict at fault
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
It sounds like saxi is a perfect case for the fundamental attribution error. BBS, attack!saxitoxin wrote:And again. I wonder how many more posts it will be before you start telling us how you think "the blacks" need to stop doing drugs and "the Asians" need to start driving better.Metsfanmax wrote:Your hypocrisy is getting increasingly annoying. The entire basis of your criticism of people who support Israel seems to be that they are racist, and yet when I even mention the idea that the Arabs are also capable of doing shitty things, suddenly the race card is unspeakable!saxitoxin wrote:Reading the increasingly not-so-covert racism in this thread I feel like I just stepped into a time machine to the 1920s. A hundred years ago "your seemingly picturesque view of the Arabs" would have read "your seemingly picturesque view of the Negroes." Fortunately the police have machine guns to cow the Arabs (be sure to watch out for the Arabess, however). It would be even better if we could herd them together and safely cage them, don't you agree? But we'd be very humane - we'll throw food into the cage and have doctors look at them sometimes. And we can even let the agreeable ones out provided they first prove they won't try to fly about on their magic carpets and summon djinn.Metsfanmax wrote:Yes, but you made a blanket statement about everyone here who has disagreed with you, and this is not the first time that you've implied that some of us are Israel supporters merely because we don't agree with your seemingly picturesque view of the Arabs.saxitoxin wrote: GFY. I was referring to universalchiro, and the rest of the Israeli nutcases, and their evangelical belief that killing all Arabs will lead to the resurrection of Jesus as you very well know.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Metsfanmax wrote:Yeah and Hamas also violated the 5-hour ceasefire the other day by firing rockets into Israel but saxi conveniently left that out because apparently it's only possible for him to support an idealized version of the Palestinians instead of the ones they actually have (and therefore the ones who actually need the support).
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
HUZZAH!!!!Metsfanmax wrote:It sounds like saxi is a perfect case for the fundamental attribution error. BBS, attack!saxitoxin wrote:And again. I wonder how many more posts it will be before you start telling us how you think "the blacks" need to stop doing drugs and "the Asians" need to start driving better.Metsfanmax wrote:Your hypocrisy is getting increasingly annoying. The entire basis of your criticism of people who support Israel seems to be that they are racist, and yet when I even mention the idea that the Arabs are also capable of doing shitty things, suddenly the race card is unspeakable!saxitoxin wrote:Reading the increasingly not-so-covert racism in this thread I feel like I just stepped into a time machine to the 1920s. A hundred years ago "your seemingly picturesque view of the Arabs" would have read "your seemingly picturesque view of the Negroes." Fortunately the police have machine guns to cow the Arabs (be sure to watch out for the Arabess, however). It would be even better if we could herd them together and safely cage them, don't you agree? But we'd be very humane - we'll throw food into the cage and have doctors look at them sometimes. And we can even let the agreeable ones out provided they first prove they won't try to fly about on their magic carpets and summon djinn.Metsfanmax wrote:Yes, but you made a blanket statement about everyone here who has disagreed with you, and this is not the first time that you've implied that some of us are Israel supporters merely because we don't agree with your seemingly picturesque view of the Arabs.saxitoxin wrote: GFY. I was referring to universalchiro, and the rest of the Israeli nutcases, and their evangelical belief that killing all Arabs will lead to the resurrection of Jesus as you very well know.
Stop being a tool, I just picked a random one of the sources I found for that claim. There are plenty more, but you won't bother to look them up because of confirmation bias. (Boom, two psychology phrases in one page! I've just been reading Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow so I can't resist.)saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Yeah and Hamas also violated the 5-hour ceasefire the other day by firing rockets into Israel but saxi conveniently left that out because apparently it's only possible for him to support an idealized version of the Palestinians instead of the ones they actually have (and therefore the ones who actually need the support).![]()
![]()
![]()
You rail against me for unfairly accusing you of siding with the looney-tune Bible thumpers then try to counter me by citing a website called Breaking Israel News - Latest News Biblical Perspective! that - in a 200 word story on current events - quotes scripture twice.
And you're an "astronomer"? What are you submitting for your thesis, the script to Star Trek?
You are an absolute treasure, Mets. Please keep posting.
BigBallinStalin wrote: the Israeli government is and has been actively seeking to exterminate and/or marginalize the Palestinians within Israeli borders and the Palestinian territories. This is OBVIOUS through the continued settlement programs in Palestinian territory, the constant warmongering, and the constant refusal to agree to (or credibly commit to) any peace treaty. The Israeli government really doesn't seek peace; it only does so when Israeli citizens feel that war weariness, but when that wears off, it's back to the bombing campaign. Israel has a permanent war economy (just like the US), so they'll keep pushing that War button, and they'll never have to sue for peace.
You're talking about a regime which used its CIA-equivalent, Mossad, to torture thousands of Palestinians--most of whom were innocent. For a nice comparison, recall the CIA's Phoenix program in Vietnam or its lovely escapade in GTMO, Abu Ghraib, Bagram, and its affiliates in 3rd world countries.
That's what you're defending, and your "what would you do" question doesn't address the history of violence and oppression committed by Israel. You just throw out that history and implicitly assume, "those crazy Arabs started it all, Israeli citizens are the only victims worth considering, and military action is somehow justified."
Regarding: "violent gang of street thugs in Hoboken, led by some crazy religious cultist," are you talking about the Israeli government or Hamas? Any military which supports Israel settlement thugs driving into nearby Palestinian towns to terrorize the populace is pretty thuggish to me. The Orthodox Jews in Israel tend to be the crazy religious cultists which constantly push for war (and for theocracy--you know, like the kind they got going in Iran and had going in AFG under the Taliban). I'm just sayin' that your characterization cuts both ways (and is essentially prejudiced against Palestinians, so sax calling you a racist is understandable).
The problem here is that who is responsible for/started the conflict depends on what historical time period we choose to use for our baseline. (Kind of like how global warming deniers pick starting dates for their temperature trends to make it seem like the trends are weaker.) And also it depends on lots of other factors. Like, I generally think the Arab community had the right to reject the UN partition plan, as a narrow issue, but obviously that decision and its effects cannot be evaluated in isolation.You just throw out that history and implicitly assume, "those crazy Arabs started it all, Israeli citizens are the only victims worth considering, and military action is somehow justified.
Wow, you just topped yourself in an encore!Metsfanmax wrote:The IDF even posted it about it on their Twitter.saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Yeah and Hamas also violated the 5-hour ceasefire the other day by firing rockets into Israel but saxi conveniently left that out because apparently it's only possible for him to support an idealized version of the Palestinians instead of the ones they actually have (and therefore the ones who actually need the support).![]()
![]()
![]()
You rail against me for unfairly accusing you of siding with the looney-tune Bible thumpers then try to counter me by citing a website called Breaking Israel News - Latest News Biblical Perspective! that - in a 200 word story on current events - quotes scripture twice.
And you're an "astronomer"? What are you submitting for your thesis, the script to Star Trek?
You are an absolute treasure, Mets. Please keep posting.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Interesting, I never knew that the Palestinians had an internal conflict like this. What if Fatah member was not the elected leader of Palestinian side? How would this conflict with Israel be different if the elected leader was from Hamas side?saxitoxin wrote:I agree with 50% of your statement.oVo wrote:I find the leaders on both sides of this ongoing conflict at fault
The inability of the Palestinian presidency to exercise its legal authority in Gaza is the fault of the Zionist regime. Deprived of access to their democratic governing institutions, Gazans are left with no choice but to express their political desires through Hamas, and to engage in necessary self-defense operations via the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades.
- - The elected leader of the Palestinian side is Abu Mazen who is not a member of Hamas and has no control over Hamas' military operations.
- The elected leader of the Israeli side is Ben Netanyahu who is a citizen of Israel and has complete control over Israel's military attacks.
1 - What minimal diplomatic cover Fatah has been able to provide the Palestinian people would be gone if Hamas held the Palestinian presidency. Israel would have a free hand to unleash a holocaust on the Palestinians of a kind the world has not seen since Rwanda. Fatah is a secular political party that includes Muslims, Christians, non-religious persons, and even a handful of Jews (one of the members of Fatah's central committee, Uri Davis, is Jewish - he is of the Old Yeshiva, the Jews who originally inhabited Palestine in peace with Arabs, prior to the Zionist arrival and land seizures), so is favored by western European governments.patrickaa317 wrote:Interesting, I never knew that the Palestinians had an internal conflict like this. What if Fatah member was not the elected leader of Palestinian side? How would this conflict with Israel be different if the elected leader was from Hamas side?saxitoxin wrote:I agree with 50% of your statement.oVo wrote:I find the leaders on both sides of this ongoing conflict at fault
The inability of the Palestinian presidency to exercise its legal authority in Gaza is the fault of the Zionist regime. Deprived of access to their democratic governing institutions, Gazans are left with no choice but to express their political desires through Hamas, and to engage in necessary self-defense operations via the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades.
- - The elected leader of the Palestinian side is Abu Mazen who is not a member of Hamas and has no control over Hamas' military operations.
- The elected leader of the Israeli side is Ben Netanyahu who is a citizen of Israel and has complete control over Israel's military attacks.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
pages 6-8 of this threadPhatscotty wrote:Just one thing I haven't noticed yet (forgive me if it's there) but after the 3 Israeli teens were kidnapped, probably tortured and then murdered, wasn't there an American relative of a Palestinian from Orlando, Florida, that was a victim of Israeli police brutality....which then caused all the Palestinian people to protest, and then started tearing up their roads for rocks to throw....
I just continue to see that left out of the timeline
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
I don't think Israel recognizes Hamas as anything morepatrickaa317 wrote:How would this conflict with Israel be different if the elected leader was from Hamas side?
When you're actually willing to discuss facts instead of talking like a partisan ideologue, let me know. I mean, pretty much this entire thread is you committing endless examples of the ad hominem fallacy.saxitoxin wrote: When someone says "LOL" they usually don't mean it. In this case I, very literally, am laughing out loud at this very moment! Bravo, Mets. Bravo. You should really think about working out a syndication deal with Comedy Central to livestream your thesis defense. I have a feeling it's gonna be a doozy.
If Israel wished for a hamas ran Palestine, why does #2 keep happening?saxitoxin wrote:1 - What minimal diplomatic cover Fatah has been able to provide the Palestinian people would be gone if Hamas held the Palestinian presidency. Israel would have a free hand to unleash a holocaust on the Palestinians of a kind the world has not seen since Rwanda. Fatah is a secular political party that includes Muslims, Christians, non-religious persons, and even a handful of Jews (one of the members of Fatah's central committee, Uri Davis, is Jewish - he is of the Old Yeshiva, the Jews who originally inhabited Palestine in peace with Arabs, prior to the Zionist arrival and land seizures), so is favored by western European governments.patrickaa317 wrote:Interesting, I never knew that the Palestinians had an internal conflict like this. What if Fatah member was not the elected leader of Palestinian side? How would this conflict with Israel be different if the elected leader was from Hamas side?saxitoxin wrote:I agree with 50% of your statement.oVo wrote:I find the leaders on both sides of this ongoing conflict at fault
The inability of the Palestinian presidency to exercise its legal authority in Gaza is the fault of the Zionist regime. Deprived of access to their democratic governing institutions, Gazans are left with no choice but to express their political desires through Hamas, and to engage in necessary self-defense operations via the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades.
- - The elected leader of the Palestinian side is Abu Mazen who is not a member of Hamas and has no control over Hamas' military operations.
- The elected leader of the Israeli side is Ben Netanyahu who is a citizen of Israel and has complete control over Israel's military attacks.
- 2- President Abbas' term actually expired 5 years ago, however, Israel has foiled every attempt to hold new elections - due to its effective military control over the West Bank and ability to control contact with Gaza - and the Palestinian constitution provides the president holds his term until his successor is elected and qualified. Hamas has exploited the perceived illegitimacy of Abu Mazen's expired term to secure effective control of Gaza.
Sadly, Fatah is a corrupt organization that seems all too willing to abandon the morality of relentless struggle against Israel (as well as the necessity of pan-Arab solidarity) so its leadership can get a variety of awards and medals from foreign governments. This needs to be acknowledged, as the exploiters will point it out otherwise, while simultaneously understanding that this is the forgivable reality of any government or organization operating in a permanent war zone without the benefit of normal institutions.
- 3 - Add 1 and 2 and you'll find that Israel wishes Hamas ran the Palestinian government. In point of proof we need only look back to the year 1967. That is the year Israel captured Gaza from Egypt. Prior to 1967 Hamas was banned by the Egyptian authorities. One of Israel's first acts was lift the ban on Hamas ... but then ban Fatah. Israel's goal is to undermine every branch of Palestinian liberation viewed as legitimate or moderate by the outside world while simultaneously bolstering religious extremists; when Islamist zealots are in charge Israel has a free hand to operate with lessened international condemnation. It is an undeniably brilliant strategy on Israel's part.