Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Does the knowledge that it with Jak at least there wasn't a strong correlation between when it happened and his alignment give you reason to reconsider what you are doing here?pancakemix wrote:They've given reasons. I at least understand their logic so I can't fault them for being reasoned. Granted I don't usually go off like this on D1, but I do do it (mostly with jak).
Calling an argument/discussion stupid and refusing to engage with it seems like a way to stifle said discussion.Metsfanmax wrote:I merely was voicing my opinion that it was stupid and I would not participate in it without a good reason. I did not attempt to actively stifle any discussion. No lynching threats were made, etc. I just said an argument was bad.pancakemix wrote:That's the first point: trying to stifle an argument by invoking the holy acronym without cause.
You can't exclude yourself from that math when you aren't the one shooting. Virus doesn't know if you are scum or not.mtamburini wrote:When I asked him to bring up the math he got and after he explained it it surprises me he included himself in the 3/11 and not make it 3/10 removing himself from the equation. If you include a lynch today and we hit town instead of mafia it becomes 3/9. Still losing odds but better then 3/11. I always exclude myself out of odds and probabilities when Im town.

That's absurd! There are likely multiple killing roles in this game. There's no reason to expect that someone would actually counterclaim in this game, we have no idea what the setup is. I'm also not entirely sure what the case on DJ actually is, so I'm leaving my vote where it is.StorrZerg wrote:Everyone needs to hop on dj wagon now.
no one has counter claimed being a vig, likely that Virus is real. We only have roughly 6 hours.

I'm not saying there's multiple vigilantes here. I'm saying that, for example, town could have both a one-shot vig and a JOAT, and the JOAT would have no reason to counterclaim the vigilante since they're completely different roles.StorrZerg wrote:disagree, i doubt roles are the same.
(unless its something role specific together)
(shit guys i just confirmed im not a vig o lord)
yeah i fail to see the reason you posted this. I don't think it changes my point.Metsfanmax wrote:I'm not saying there's multiple vigilantes here. I'm saying that, for example, town could have both a one-shot vig and a JOAT, and the JOAT would have no reason to counterclaim the vigilante since they're completely different roles.StorrZerg wrote:disagree, i doubt roles are the same.
(unless its something role specific together)
(shit guys i just confirmed im not a vig o lord)

It does. A lack of counterclaim only matters when you expect the role to be in the game. If someone claims town doctor in a normal game, and that doesn't get counterclaimed, that's meaningful because town has a doctor virtually every time. One-shot vig is not expected to be in every game to begin with, and there's really nothing to go on in an explicitly unbalanced game. So the lack of a counterclaim doesn't allow you to draw any conclusions. It's possible that there was just never a one-shot vig in this game to begin with, which means that there couldn't be anyone counterclaiming.StorrZerg wrote:yeah i fail to see the reason you posted this. I don't think it changes my point.Metsfanmax wrote:I'm not saying there's multiple vigilantes here. I'm saying that, for example, town could have both a one-shot vig and a JOAT, and the JOAT would have no reason to counterclaim the vigilante since they're completely different roles.StorrZerg wrote:disagree, i doubt roles are the same.
(unless its something role specific together)
(shit guys i just confirmed im not a vig o lord)


How did you find this out? If this is true, then if virus is making a fake claim he won't be counterclaimed because he already knows no-one else has this role. Which would mean either he is a 1-shot vig, or there is no similar vig in the game. Either one I could see happening, since this is balance-not-included mafia after all. His lack of posting even though he is on the chopping block doesn't look good for him either. Worst-case scenario, we lynch a 1-shot vig who was going to take a potshot tonight anyway. Best case, we lynch a scum. Either way, we get more info than a no-lynch. So I will leave my vote where it is for now.StorrZerg wrote:kk fyi. mafia have fake claims in this game. This shouldn't be a surprise based on what we have. You know to help prevent a mass claim from working.
SO i'm REALLY questioning people who are "saying the claim is weak" or w/e cause or saying "well i expected batman to be different " blah. (correct me if im wrong, but i think dj was pushing that)
asked the mod. + previous game i played where he hosted had fake claims.HotShot53 wrote:How did you find this out? If this is true, then if virus is making a fake claim he won't be counterclaimed because he already knows no-one else has this role. Which would mean either he is a 1-shot vig, or there is no similar vig in the game. Either one I could see happening, since this is balance-not-included mafia after all. His lack of posting even though he is on the chopping block doesn't look good for him either. Worst-case scenario, we lynch a 1-shot vig who was going to take a potshot tonight anyway. Best case, we lynch a scum. Either way, we get more info than a no-lynch. So I will leave my vote where it is for now.StorrZerg wrote:kk fyi. mafia have fake claims in this game. This shouldn't be a surprise based on what we have. You know to help prevent a mass claim from working.
SO i'm REALLY questioning people who are "saying the claim is weak" or w/e cause or saying "well i expected batman to be different " blah. (correct me if im wrong, but i think dj was pushing that)
FP by Storr... I was typing lol, taking a 2 min break while at work that I really shouldn't be, but figured I should get my comment out before day's end

That's not impossible. I wasn't saying there aren't two vig's either. I'm just saying, there's certainly no reason to think that there has to be any in this game, and certainly after that, that there has to be exactly one. I was thinking the same thing you said here in my original post, I just didn't want to make it too complicated in my response to Storr.virus90 wrote:@metsfanmax, i am just a 1-shot vig, maybe there is a 1-shot vig, but for the same reasoning i think if i would have claimed 1-shot vig, there could have been 2, and although i think its not likely, there might be 2 vigi's aswell. as you say, its not balanced, why would it be impossbile to have 2 roles of the same/. similar tpye.
To generally shut down discussion with no regard for the discussion he is shutting down itself. Point 2 is bad logic intended to confound (and he admitted that the logic was faulty). All of the points lead to suffocating D1 to give mafia an extra step on town going into D2.spiesr wrote:Pancakemix, about this post, what motive are you assuming a scum Mets would have in doing the thing in Point 1 without creating a situation where he was right about the thing in Point 2?
No, because that's not always indicative of his alignment. Taking into consideration three incidents where jak and I had a protracted argument similar to the one here, once in that time he was scum. Given the small sample size of those arguments, I can't call it conclusive one way or the other, but there's evidence to suggest either alignment is possible.Does the knowledge that it with Jak at least there wasn't a strong correlation between when it happened and his alignment give you reason to reconsider what you are doing here?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.