Moderator: Community Team
This, along with rocking the shit out of my flip phone, works everytime. I'll probably share my experiences and the results in the Platinum Loungemrswdk wrote:Yeah, why has PS been asking multiple female strangers in random places whether or not they think part of the moon is missing? Is this how PS gets the ladies hot?
Then why is my premium still so high?mrswdk wrote:Obama sold it to aliens to pay for the Affordable Healthcare Act.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
It was Omnipotus.Phatscotty wrote:... it looks like a chunk of the moon is missing on the bottom right corner. WTF?
Anyone else noticed this or heard an explanation for why it looks like this?

Haha! The Tick was a great show.degaston wrote:It was Omnipotus.Phatscotty wrote:... it looks like a chunk of the moon is missing on the bottom right corner. WTF?
Anyone else noticed this or heard an explanation for why it looks like this?
It's a trick based on the way our eyes work. We perceive bright objects as being larger than they are, and dark objects as being smaller than they are. It's the reason fat people were black clothes.Phatscotty wrote:Alright, giving up searching the internet on this one and I haven't heard anyone talking about it in over a month. Most people I know and even recently total (female) strangers in random places have all agreed when asked; it looks like a chunk of the moon is missing on the bottom right corner. WTF?
Anyone else noticed this or heard an explanation for why it looks like this?

Women's cycles follow lunar cycles.Phatscotty wrote:Alright, giving up searching the internet on this one and I haven't heard anyone talking about it in over a month. Most people I know and even recently total (female) strangers in random places have all agreed when asked; it looks like a chunk of the moon is missing on the bottom right corner. WTF?
Anyone else noticed this or heard an explanation for why it looks like this?
So do men.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Women's cycles follow lunar cycles.

"Nobody" is a pretty broad term.Phatscotty wrote:How come nobody has noticed it looks different before a month ago?
It could also be researcher bias. The way I see it there are four possibilities:Dukasaur wrote:I very much suspect sample bias. Three or four people that you know may have commented on it in the last month. I very much doubt if that is a representative sample of the entire planet's population.
He's not just saying that it looks like there's a chunk missing. He's saying that a month ago, it did not look that way. And that people he's talked to agree, but no one else does. And the media, even the conspiracy-laden sources that he gets his information from, are not reporting on it.Dukasaur wrote:"Nobody" is a pretty broad term.Phatscotty wrote:How come nobody has noticed it looks different before a month ago?
I very much suspect sample bias. Three or four people that you know may have commented on it in the last month. I very much doubt if that is a representative sample of the entire planet's population.
Personally, I noticed it many years ago, but I understood the light/dark bias in our eyes, so I never considered it important enough to discuss with anyone. You're the first person I know that's ever actually asked about it, so you're the first person I ever explained it to.
Option 6:mrswdk wrote:Option 5 is that part of the moon really has been stolen as an excuse for NASA to invade outer space in a war that will prop up their military-industrial complex sugar daddies.
It was retconned to 2016 due to the unexpected decline* in the lunar exploration program.tzor wrote:That happened in 1999, silly.degaston wrote:Option 6:
Thank you very much Dukky! I think I missed the brightness darkness ratio and how it affects our sight because having a history/family history of all different kinds of sales. me n mine mostly talk about objects creating motion to guide the eye and where it looks therefore what it looks at, which is always by the highest/higher mark-ups to get more people to look at them and spend time in our booth/tent/flea market etc. Maybe I had never noticed it before because I'm 35 now and my eyes aren't 20/20 anymore. I think the moon was probably just in the right cycle a couple months ago so the visual effect had the most impact. However, I've never heard anyone talk about this in my life, I meant 'nobody' as in that I know of or have ever known. I kind of thought maybe the moon did take an impact because 2-3 nights after I had first noticed it (over the period of my life) there seemed to by a dust plume that expanded out past the bottom right corner actually making it appear to be bigger on the bottom right.Dukasaur wrote:It's a trick based on the way our eyes work. We perceive bright objects as being larger than they are, and dark objects as being smaller than they are. It's the reason fat people were black clothes.Phatscotty wrote:Alright, giving up searching the internet on this one and I haven't heard anyone talking about it in over a month. Most people I know and even recently total (female) strangers in random places have all agreed when asked; it looks like a chunk of the moon is missing on the bottom right corner. WTF?
Anyone else noticed this or heard an explanation for why it looks like this?
As you can sea, most of the right side (from our point of view) of the moon is dark "seas" that our eyes fool us into thinking they are smaller than they are. To a lesser degree, this is also true of the lower 1/3 of the moon. The "top left" of the moon is the opposite. It is highly pulverized rock that reflects light very brightly and therefore seems to us as being larger than it is.