Moderator: Community Team
If you have a problem with my level of participation, you're one inconsistent man. You know perfectly well that I've participated in the top half of this sorry group. It screams to high heaven that you're not targeting Greg or hotshot if that is your criteria. You ought to be earnest and say that you don't have a case.BuJaber wrote:
I'm not comfortable with Ragian's level of activity. At this point the only one I feel is probably town is Mets. And if we assume that lynchproof scum is too overpowered then dakky would have to be town too.
Until more information is revealed, I will go with my gut. IF you think I'm town and are willing to trust my instinct, vote with me.. or present a better case against someone else. I will change my vote if I'm convinced.
So FOS IB and Vote Ragian.


I didn't call the action scummy. I was suggesting that it was poor reasoning, which doesn't make someone scum.Ragian wrote: 3 Mets calls IB out for voting due to 2,which he seems to think is a scummy move. Yet he votes for mitch himself. I understand that there's a different reason, but I don't get why you would vote along someone you find scummy.
With 6 votes on you, it's more of a formality of waiting for the scene than anything else.madmitch wrote:not quite dead yet
Okay. I misinterpreted, then.Metsfanmax wrote:I didn't call the action scummy. I was suggesting that it was poor reasoning, which doesn't make someone scum.Ragian wrote: 3 Mets calls IB out for voting due to 2,which he seems to think is a scummy move. Yet he votes for mitch himself. I understand that there's a different reason, but I don't get why you would vote along someone you find scummy.
Balls in your court, Greg.madmitch wrote:no I did not, did not know my ability until day 2 ,did not like it because I knew NO ONE WOULD BELIEVE ME,so here I am hung again ,watch out for METS and the howling boy


You may ask.TimWoodbury wrote: @Wing since greg is asking mitch if he did anything alst night may i ask if you did anything and if so to who did you do it to(dont need to say what you did just if you did and who)
but you do realize there are 6 votes on you and that you are technically dead, unless you're another lynchproof or someone saved you...madmitch wrote:that wcg is a slippery onecan't throw me in the cart yet,I am still alive, whose that? that must be the king. why? he isn't covered in shit
![]()
Actually Mets hammered, not mitch himself ^^ LOLwilliam18 wrote:madmitch - Ironbutterly, Hotshot53, Wingcmdrginkapo, Dakky21, Bujaber, madmitch
Since mitch was already hammered, there was no reason to disclose my reasoning for why I would have left my vote on him. It could be potentially harmful to town if I did reveal it, so I will hold off for now.BuJaber wrote: Hotshot any reason why you're not revealing your reasons for voting mitch?

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Bujaber hurry up. Its clearly you thats holding up the scene.
Do you think this means mitch made up his own claim, or do you think it was one provided by the mod, or do you think the mod didn't provide fake claims? Because if it's the latter, perhaps a mass character claim should be considered.Metsfanmax wrote: However it does sound a lot like the sort of role you would make up if you searched for people who were alive at the time.
Speaking if throwing team mates under the bus...Metsfanmax wrote:OK gregwolf121, but by saying that you have info that applied specifically to madmitch and that you wanted to know specifically if he visited anyone last night, you have already effectively soft-claimed what your role is. Also, it was completely unnecessary to ask that question because backup doc is a role that cannot have visited anyone before he became doc, so if the information you have is what you're signalling (i.e. that you're a tracker/watcher) then you knew he was lying immediately.
This is also the reason why I didn't like IB immediately jumping onto the case with greg. Either greg is just giving away unnecessary information to scum, or this was part of a ploy to bus mitch and gain himself town points.
